What's new

Taiwan Simulates Chinese Invasion

TruthSeeker

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Joined
Nov 27, 2008
Messages
6,390
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
Taiwan Intensifies Military Exercises, Simulates Chinese Invasion

Micaela Burrow

|
Posted: Jul 16, 2020 9:45 AM
South China Morning Post.

Taiwan President Tsai Ing-Wen, inaugurated for a second term on May 20, has opposed reunification with mainland China despite pressure from Beijing.

While Taiwan instituted the Han Kuag exercises in 1984 to simulate Taiwan’s response to a potential Chinese invasion, this is only its second year to deploy cooperative battalions. In addition, Taiwan has never before this year conducted live-fire drills.

In a drill on Wednesday, Taiwan fired surface and underwater target (SUT) heavyweight torpedoes for the first time in 13 years, Taiwan News reported. The torpedoes successfully struck and downed the target ships.

The United States recently approved a $180 million torpedo sale to Taiwan, replacing the obsolete German SUTs.

Troop mobilization capacity would also be stressed, Taiwan News said.

“The reserve force is undersized and undertrained, and thus lacks the deterrent punch it should carry,” Michael Mazza, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a D.C.-based think tank, said back in April. “Now is the time to begin addressing these deficits.”

Chinese analysts claim that Taiwan’s show of military clout will only serve to jeopardize its independence from the PRC, rendering the nation a victim to American ambitions.

“Among them, the most concerning factor is the collusion between the United States and Taiwan region in an attempt to strengthen cooperation on military security, which in turn escalates the China-U.S. strategic rivalry and undermines peace and stability across the Taiwan Straits,” says Zhang Hua of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

News agencies reported sighting both Chinese and American reconnaissance missions monitoring the exercises.

China began a 79-day training exercise involving live fire on May 14.

Song Zhongping, a military analyst, told Lianhe Zaobao, a Sigapore-based Chinese daily, that the unusual timing and duration indicate China may be attempting to reinforce its dominance and deter any Taiwanese separatist aspirations.

“To Beijing, Taiwan appears to have ventured further on the road to independence and at a faster pace,” reports Beijing correspondent Yu Zeyuan. “It can be inferred that these exercises are conducted to ensure that mainland China has the determination and capability to handle the Taiwan issue by non-peaceful means, should Taiwan overstep mainland China’s Anti-Secession Law.”

Taiwan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs released a statement on Tuesday urging contending parties to resolve conflicts in the South China Sea according to the requirements of international law and include Taiwan in the process.

“We firmly oppose any attempt by a claimant state to resolve disputes in the South China Sea by means of intimidation, coercion, or force,” the statement reads.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/micae...exercises-simulates-chinese-invasion-n2572564
 
. . . .
Taiwan conducted a tri-services military drill yesterday to simulate a response to an air attack by Beijing.

Eight F-16 jets took off at 0530 on March 25 to simulate an intercept of aircraft flying in from the mainland. Last week, China conducted an exercise in which its warplanes approached Taiwan’s airspace at night for the first time.

aad_1585205833.jpg


https://www.defenseworld.net/news/2...nterception_of_China_s_Warplanes#.XxC1R2g3tdg
 
.
I doubt it. Rather wishful thinking. Taiwan is a one day job for China.
Most likely the Taiwanese soldiers will just surrender in the event of China's liberation of Taiwan. The Taiwanese soldiers are not cowards. Most soldiers are soldiers because it is a decent paying job. Taiwanese economy have not grown like South Korea for twenty years due to petty politics and lack of innovation.
 
. .
Make it so costly for China...

As a veteran of the Gulf War you should be aware that during the Gulf War air campaign, coalition forces outnumbered Iraqi Air Force 4:1 and had a decisive advantage in AWACs with 10 AWACs deployed.

The PLAAF outnumbers the ROCAF 4:1 in combat planes, coincidentally the same ratio as coalition vs. Iraqi Air Force.

The other difference is that ROCAF only has 6 AWAC planes, all E-2Ks (Taiwanese E-2C) with APS-145 pulse-doppler radar. PLAAF has 28 AESA radar AWACs. Again, what a coincidence that the advantage that the PLAAF holds over ROCAF is the same magnitude as that held by coalition forces over Iraqi Air Force.
 
. .
don't forget US is compelled to come to taiwan's aid should china attack... this might even get japan involved
Actually this is not the case ... the US does not have to get involved militarily should China attack, per the Taiwan relations act.
The Taiwan Relations Act does not guarantee the USA will intervene militarily if the PRC attacks or invades Taiwan nor does it relinquish it, as its primary purpose is to ensure the US's Taiwan policy will not be changed unilaterally by the president and ensure any decision to defend Taiwan will be made with the consent of Congress
 
.
Taiwan conducted a tri-services military drill yesterday to simulate a response to an air attack by Beijing.

Eight F-16 jets took off at 0530 on March 25 to simulate an intercept of aircraft flying in from the mainland. Last week, China conducted an exercise in which its warplanes approached Taiwan’s airspace at night for the first time.

aad_1585205833.jpg


https://www.defenseworld.net/news/2...nterception_of_China_s_Warplanes#.XxC1R2g3tdg


All those Taiwan's F-16 will be shot down by Chinese ADS including S-400s.
 
.
Actually this is not the case ... the US does not have to get involved militarily should China attack, per the Taiwan relations act.
Is there no provision that US must send troops if Taiwan is attacked?
 
.
don't forget US is compelled to come to taiwan's aid should china attack... this might even get japan involved

LoL

US does not even officially recognize Taiwan. US still adheres to one China policy.

US will sell weapons and put some ships in SCS but don't expect US to fight for Taiwan.

What did US & Europe do when China crushed Tiananmen square or Hong Kong activists? Taiwan will follow Hong Kong and surrender on day one.

US & EU will give some sound bites and put some useless sanctions that no one cares.

Is there no provision that US must send troops if Taiwan is attacked?

There is no provision and I will put my money that US will not get involved in the conflict.

All US would do is to sell some weapons and share some intelligence. That's about it.

Most likely the Taiwanese soldiers will just surrender in the event of China's liberation of Taiwan. The Taiwanese soldiers are not cowards. Most soldiers are soldiers because it is a decent paying job. Taiwanese economy have not grown like South Korea for twenty years due to petty politics and lack of innovation.

Also, at heart Taiwanese are Chinese. They will not fight their Chinese brothers.

When Taiwan joins China, China will get a big boost to Electronics/Technology and get access to all US/Western Defence weapons.

China can use all these to take a great lead over US.

This is akin to how US got hold of soviet weapons through former soviet and warsaw pact countries after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
 
Last edited:
.
The PLAAF outnumbers the ROCAF 4:1 in combat planes, coincidentally the same ratio as coalition vs. Iraqi Air Force.

The other difference is that ROCAF only has 6 AWAC planes, all E-2Ks (Taiwanese E-2C) with APS-145 pulse-doppler radar. PLAAF has 28 AESA radar AWACs. Again, what a coincidence that the advantage that the PLAAF holds over ROCAF is the same magnitude as that held by coalition forces over Iraqi Air Force.
The differences are not secrets. What is also not secret is that the PLA have limited landing sites for an invasion and that the PLA's amphibious forces would be vulnerable in crossing the strait even before landing. Which means that in order for a successful amphibious landing, complete air supremacy must be achieved over Taiwan. Back in DS, Iraq had no ally whereas Taiwan have the world's most powerful ally -- US. Tactically speaking, all the Taiwan-US alliance has to do is a repeat of the Battle of Britain -- create so much uncertainty in the sky that the enemy have no choice but to prolong the air campaign and in that, China cannot sustain.
 
.
The differences are not secrets. What is also not secret is that the PLA have limited landing sites for an invasion and that the PLA's amphibious forces would be vulnerable in crossing the strait even before landing. Which means that in order for a successful amphibious landing, complete air supremacy must be achieved over Taiwan. Back in DS, Iraq had no ally whereas Taiwan have the world's most powerful ally -- US. Tactically speaking, all the Taiwan-US alliance has to do is a repeat of the Battle of Britain -- create so much uncertainty in the sky that the enemy have no choice but to prolong the air campaign and in that, China cannot sustain.

Iraq had a similar relationship with the Soviets and France. Didn't help them. Taiwan also isn't a US treaty ally.

The difference between Britain and Taiwan is that Britain had the WW2 Royal Navy while Taiwan... Also has ships from the era of WW2 Royal Navy.

Another difference is that German air defense didn't have an missile range covering all of Britain while still in dock.

Britain also invented radar and had air defense radar while Germany didn't fully understand the significance of radar.

Gulf War is much better comparison.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom