Supreme court allows detained Italian marine to go home

[Biplab Bijay]

@jbgt90 @janon its just for fun guys.. I just want to show people the hypocracy of these kind of people..

What Hypocrisy ?

 

[possumlot]

India is never been a bad place for me.. It will remain a good place even if people like you try to rewrite history as you wish.. ;0

As long as India remains majority Hindu it will always be a good place for everybody .....even if people like you try to make the country sickular in your image.

 

[Iggy]

They are kids why are you bothering .

Okay.. Stopping!! AM out!! Just these guys are pissed off because of my religion.. Am just rubbing salt in their wounds

 

[Biplab Bijay]

As long as India remains majority Hindu it will always be a good place for everybody .....even if people like you try to make the country sickular in your image.

Very true.

 

[Indrani]

Your posts speak volumes of your maturity.

So maturity is now equated with keeping India a third world country and making politics a dirty word to the middle class? Or maturity is in allowing minorities to maintain their religious places while taking over majority communities religious places and using the temple money for secular purposes? The list of sickular maturity display is rather long and I do not want to spend time listing all of their greatness here.

 

[Biplab Bijay]

So maturity is now equated with keeping India a third world country and making politics a dirty word to the middle class? Or maturity is in allowing minorities to maintain their religious places while taking over majority communities religious places and using the temple money for secular purposes? The list of sickular maturity display is rather long and I do not want to spend time listing all of their greatness here.

By the way sad to say that our Last prime Minister said " Muslims have the first right on the resources of India". The Seculars were happy. But I dont know how this is secular ?

 

[Indrani]

They are kids why are you bothering .

LOL. Yeah Togadia and Dr. Swamy who speak the same language I do are also teens.

Okay.. Stopping!! AM out!! Just these guys are pissed off because of my religion.. Am just rubbing salt in their wounds

No one is pissed off about your religion. You can keep practicing it, just do not try to ruin India by voting for thieves again and again just because they hate Hinduism like you do.

 

[T90TankGuy]

LOL. Yeah Togadia and Dr. Swamy who speak the same language I do are also teens.



No one is pissed off about your religion. You can keep practicing it, just do not try to ruin India by voting for thieves again and again just because they hate Hinduism like you do.

The only person who is showing any hatred here is you . but then you cant see that can you?

 

[Indrani]

The only person who is showing any hatred here is you . but then you cant see that can you?

What hatred? Have I asked for special privileges for Hindus? The only one who is a hypocrite as well as a hater is you who want minorities to have their cake and eat it too at the expense of the majority community. We saw that in the instances when private Christian schools backed off of providing 25% seats to underprivileged children but still carry out propaganda that they are working for the poor at every single opportunity. Guess you are too much of a Christian and will always have a sense of entitlement and anyone questioning that will be deemed as a hater and may be you will give interviews of persecution of Christians in India now.

 

[abjktu]

Any response from Victims family?

haha..
Kollapettavarude kudumbathinu- oru kodi veetham nalki...
Dhrikshaakshikku-pathinezhu laksham...
still you want response???..This is India..

 

[Hulk]

That is for the courts to decide. You or I cannot judg such things. It is precisely for that reason that a free and fair trial will be conducted. If in the course of the trial it is established that the shooting was accidental and that the marines were blameless, then the court will set them free. But they have to undergo trial.

By the way, even if the killig wasn't intentional, it doesn't mean it was "accidental". There are many degrees of culpability. Unless they can demonstrate clearly why they thought the victims were a lethal threat, they will not go scot free. It's not premeditated murder - everybody agrees that much. But it could be culpable homicide not amounting to murder, or criminal negligence.

Anybody with a gun can shoot - the reason that only qualified, trained armed forces personnel are given the right to shoot, is because they are expected to know when to shoot - judicious use of force. Being marines, they should have known better than to shoot at unarmed people.



Umm...your quote mentions a congress party leader mingling with them.

Whichever party is in power, they cannot simply arrest the marines without proving the case first. It is upto the court whether to let them out on bail pending trial or not. The court has given them bail, and I don't see how any political party can prevent them from visiting any private club they want, or living their choice of lifestyle, as lng as they don't violate the terms of the bail.

FFS people, stop this ridiculous party politics.

I am not giving verdict and I agree it is for the court to decide. It is my opinion and I have the right to have opinion. Even if the Marines did made and error of judgment in killing the people, still the intention was not bad and in comparison to criminals they should have a less stricter punishment.

 

[janon]

I am not giving verdict and I agree it is for the court to decide. It is my opinion and I have the right to have opinion. Even if the Marines did made and error of judgment in killing the people, still the intention was not bad and in comparison to criminals they should have a less stricter punishment.

Yes, you can have your opinion, that is true.

But the question of whether it was really an accident with no blame to ascribe, or whether there was negligence involved on their part, is not really a matter of personal opinion - it is a matter of fact, that can only be judged after weighing all the evidence. That is the job of the court.

Maybe you think that you know enough of the case to come to a conclusion - and that is fine, you can think so. I have my doubts, it is my feeling that they have shown at least some negligence that led to death.

Anyway at this stage, they are being presumed innocent, pending trial. If and only if negligence is proved, will they be declared guilty.

And by the way, nobody is alleging that they intentionally did it - if so, it would be a murder case in the first degree. They did not plan and intentionally kill them - at most, it was criminal negligence. Even if they are found guilty, they will get a lesser punishment - not death penalty or life imprisonment. At most 5 or 6 years in jail, which can be further reduced later.

 

[Hulk]

Yes, you can have your opinion, that is true.

But the question of whether it was really an accident with no blame to ascribe, or whether there was negligence involved on their part, is not really a matter of personal opinion - it is a matter of fact, that can only be judged after weighing all the evidence. That is the job of the court.

Maybe you think that you know enough of the case to come to a conclusion - and that is fine, you can think so. I have my doubts, it is my feeling that they have shown at least some negligence that led to death.

Anyway at this stage, they are being presumed innocent, pending trial. If and only if negligence is proved, will they be declared guilty.

And by the way, nobody is alleging that they intentionally did it - if so, it would be a murder case in the first degree. They did not plan and intentionally kill them - at most, it was criminal negligence. Even if they are found guilty, they will get a lesser punishment - not death penalty or life imprisonment. At most 5 or 6 years in jail, which can be further reduced later.

I am not deciding, I am just giving my opinion. I am saying that whatever court will be deciding is fine with me.

 

[janon]

I am not deciding, I am just giving my opinion. I am saying that whatever court will be deciding is fine with me.

Yes, I understand that. I was also giving my opinion that there is some guilt on their part. I could be wrong, we'll wait for the court's judgement to know.