HariPrasad
BANNED

- Joined
- Aug 5, 2013
- Messages
- 14,055
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
lol, when was Su-30MKI "war-proven"? Which war?
Su-30MKI is good on paper. 3000 range and blah blah...but in real combat mission, it hardly matters.
Say for example India plans to conduct an air-strike on nuclear-sites of enemy 2500km away. Su-30MKI, with 3000km range and 4.5 combat endurance comes to mind.
But can india use this bird?
It is such a BIG aircraft with such a massive RCS that enemy radars will pick it up hundreds of kilometers away from border.....and then enemy fighters will be air-borne.
Israelis were able to destroy Iraq's nuclear-plant using F-16s....If they had used Su-30MKI, they would have had failed.
A smaller fighter-jet, armed with advance avionics, AESA radar, jammers, and loaded with smart weapons is way more lethal than anything like that of Su-30MKI.
Therefore jets like Eurofighters, Rafale, and F-16 block 60 E/F are much more sophisticated/better aircrafts for airforces around the world.
This is a much more dangerous threat for an enemy
![]()
compared to this
![]()
MKIs will be converted into super Sukhois with very low RCS. Work is on. Your argument does't hold good even on RCS criterion.