Good. So you are now going to teach us democracy as well, the great strength of the Islamic world and Pakistan.
Somebody has to, when faced with hypocrisy.
And that justifies it in your opinion?
No, it explains it. There is a difference between explaining something and justifying it.
Our relationship is not complex for some reason?
India's relationship is very transparent: sacrifice humanitarian principles in exchange for Israeli military help against Pakistan.
I think you do. It stands for the justification of the partition of India. Clear now?
TNT is not a well known acronym for anything other than dynamite. And what exactly is the relevance of that here? The debate is about respect for diversity in Indian national discourse.
It is nothing but hallucination. You presume something and convince yourself, nothing more than that.
It is amply documented by the Indian posts on every Israel-related thread. The militant jingoists like yourself drown out any dissent by shouting down anyone else in the name of 'national interests'. Implication being that anyone who dares to disagree with you is harming national interests and is not a true patriot.
The governments consist of Muslims as well. So at least one Muslim is supporting Israel, why not an Indian Muslim?
The Presidency is a ceremonial post and, in any case, one person does not make foregn policy.
And you said earlier that your opposition had nothing to do with being a Muslim! So are you not tying yourself all over in knots?
My stance on Israel is separate from religion. But it is a fact that Israel has turned it into a religious conflict and many Muslims respond as such.
India didn't have ethnic cleansing. We had a large number of Muslims and they have been increasing in population share.
Unlike Pakistan! Don't even bother comparing.
Spare me the revisionist history. Millions of Muslims were displaced from India in 1947, and their land confiscated.
It was simply about the plight of Palestinians that you brought up. It seems you care nothing for Palestinians, just using them to target Israel. It comes through.
Once again, the subject is India-Israel, not India-Lebanon.
That is history of the 1947 war.
No, it is the leadup to 1947 that matters; the slow encroachment of Zionists over Palestinian land. The Zionists had been planning this thing for over a century.
Not happening in a hurry. It only shows that you are an enemy of the only practical way to achieve peace. A two state solution with guaranteed security for Israel and a viable Palestine.
Pratical by whose definition? That the Israelis get to keep what they stole by force?
Once again, you are showing your true colors by subjugating human rights to material gains.
I know, Islamophobia was waiting to be brought in. The last weapon of the Islamist.
No, the appropriate label for one such as yourself who characterizes a principled position as 'hateful' simply because it advocates the rights of Muslims.
I know may be more than you. Don't assume what I know or don't know. But this is off topic, isn't it?
It is appropriate to point out the eradication of Buddhism from India by Hindu extremists, to highlight your hypocrisy and selective historical view.
I was talking about Arabs having the numbers on their side! What did you think?
No, you were talking about the Samson doctrine and how Israel would wipe out the entire Middle East. Don't even try to weasel out of it.
You were reveling in your Islamophobia vicariously through Israel -- like a lot of Israeli supporters.