Once again, the Egypt-Israel peace accord is only supported by the Egyptian government and military -- both of which are addicted to US dollars. The Egyptian people are 95% against Israel.
And Turkey making up with Israel was also about sucking up to the West. Turkey's population is far less friendly towards Israel than its government.
Let's see what these countries do in the future. I don't see them playing war war with Israel if they care for the people.
The governments necessarily need to be more rational than the gullible people.
Mostly Turks buying Israeli military equipment.
Same as India. And on a much larger scale. So what was your point again?
Not sure what you're on about. The issue was Indian Muslims' ability to voice dissent and you started going on about TNT. Hello????
Where did you see that Indian Muslims are against the relationship? You only presumed it and started commenting on their status in India.
Where does it come from except for the need to justify TNT? Don't even bother trying here, it is plain to see.
Elections are usually about domestic issues, not international affairs. Just by the tenor of the posts here, it is clear if anyone objected to Israel, they would be accused of sabotaging 'national interests'. Especially Muslims. So much for respecting differences of opinion.
All presumptive and hypothetical.
Because an Indian poster said he is Muslim and he supports Israel.
So what is your problem with that? If whole Islamic countries can support Israel, why not an Indian Muslim?
If any country starts evicting people en masse because of their religion or ethnicity, that is a cause for concern. People complain about Yugoslavia, Rwada, Darfur. And Israel. They are all abhorrent. Except Israel gets a pass.
Add West Pakistan to the list. Almost complete ethnic cleansing in 1947, much more so than in Israel.
This discussion is about India and Israel, not the rest of the world. We can open other threads if you want to discuss.
I thought you were concerned by the plight of Palestinian refugees. Does the concern evaporate if the plight is in an Islamic country?
Who are you to tell them what to do with their land that their ancestors have been living continuously for 2000 years?
I am not telling anything. It is you who is trying to decide on behalf of the Jews and the Arabs.
Begaani shaadi me.....
Now the Jews are also living continuously in that land for 100 odd years. Does that count?
What everyone can see is your pathetic tendency to randomly spout the word 'hatred' when you fail to make a point.
Well, I made point pretty clear.
I only speak of muyself. Only Islamophones are obsessed with the 'ummah'.
Nope. It is clear where you are coming from.
There are plenty of Parsis in Pakistan and Iran. And you weren't so kind to the Buddhists...
Pakistan inherited them from India. Iran, well it was the primary religion there and suffered brutality. Its a sad tale like in so many other places at that time.
Buddhism and Hinduism are both Dharmic religions from the sacred soil of India and there have been periods when one is more ascendant than the other.
None of them was forced from outside at the point of a sword. Why would you use this to justify what happened in Iran?
Yes, the Palestinians have been 'deterred' quite thoroughly.
Not just the Palestinians. All the Arab world that set out to throw them to the sea.
They are not the David as you make them out to be. They have a tremendous advantage in all kinds of numbers, an advantage of 50-100 times.
Nonsense!
You sold out your morals for material gains. You would never do business with apartheid-era South Africa, but you do so with Israel.
Remember, it was Nelson Mandela who called Arafat a 'brother in arms' at the Nobel Prize ceremony.
We always helped Arafaat. Even he negotiated with Israel and recognized it. What are you going on about?
the army even today still honours it as for Turkey they were the closest friend of Israel go wiki it.
