Stating facts doesn't mean hatred except for people like you who want to run away from facts. Just because they are inconvenient now (they were a source of pride then and even now to many of you).
It is an irrelevant canard, unless you think the Muslim invasion of India is somehow relevant to the India-Israel relationship.
This is hallucination. As I said, don't try to deduce when you have a problem reading straight.
When the topic is A, and you talk about B, it means you think B is somehow related to A.
In your warped mind, the subjugation of Palestinians is somehow justified because Muslims invaded India all those centuries ago.
No, I have nothing against anyone caring for Palestinians. Even India supports them.
Once again, the issue is not 'caring for Palestinians'. We all care for them.
The issue is whether the oppressor nation of Israel should be held accountable.
Also your (and fellow Islamists') selective look at human rights issues has long been apparent. So you lose credibility.
The biggest human rights violations are taking place in Islamic countries (of cpurse that is off-topic for you, always will be).
Ah, the Islam-bashing, right on cue.
Since you still don't get it, the topic is Israel, not world history. You can't excuse one crime by listing a litany of crimes throughout history and saying "either we address all of these or we address none".
Your prentensions to great knowledge are laughable given what has been demonstrated here.
Indeed. I've called you out on your utter ignorance of Kargil, Turkey, Egypt, China, etc, etc.
It seems, other than medieval India, you haven't a clue what's happening in the world around you. Not even your own country's history.
Now, coming back to the Chinese relations with Israel, see your sudden urge to defend it and try to explain it in terms of bigger issues. Does it take away from it's supposed anti-Islam slant? Same for Islamic country's relations.
No, my simplistic friend. The situation with China and Israel is far more complex than you think. Suffice it to say that Pakistan eventually benefits from this relationship also.
You do understand what all this comes across as or I need to be more explicit?
Yes, it comes across that you don't understand geopolitics beyond India. And I am sure you prefer to remain ignorant, lest you become 'more Chinese than the Chinese' or 'more Israeli than the Jews'.
And no one buys your claim. Not India, not China, not the world and not many Pakistanis who want relations with Israel.
The facts are on display: the Israelis are very upfront about their policies and I have already stated them earleir in this thread.
People know. The fact that they chose to rationalize them away is another matter.
You think so. They don't. They don't need to. They don't look at the issue from a religious prism like you.
Precisely. They look at it from a materialistic view to disregard unsavory truths.
It has more to do with the territorial conflict. Religion is secondary.
Religion is
the defining factor in that territorial dispute. Again, if you had the slightest smatttering of knowledge about Zionism, you would have known this.
As you are acknowledging that Arab Christians are also a victim, it blows away your anti Islam thingy to smithereen.
On the contrary, it strengthens the assertion that Israel discriminates on the basis of religion.
Now, no one considers Israel anti Christian for that dispute.
Because most 'Christians' are not religious, and the ones that are tend to believe in Jesus' second coming which requires Israel exist as a Jewish state. Hence they support Israel. Now, I am sure you are blissfully ignorant of this aspect of Christian support for Israel and will claim that I am making it up.
