The writer found that photo in a Russian archive, so she speculated that it could be taken in Russia. This is what the article says: "If the photo is scanned, it MIGHT prove that the photo was taken in Russia", and in the very next paragraph the article states that 'it might be too hasty to conclude anything'. Where it is written "Must" that you are repeatedly using?
In 10 pages of discussion you have found one straw and you are desperately clutching onto it. If you want, then I can give you the facebook link of the writer for further clarification.
See, after that air crash(?) Indian government has constituted three commissions, the last one was commissioned by NDA government and that commission had concluded that Netaji didn't die in the plane crash, and UPA govt. rejected the findings. And then the government is not ready to release the files, Netaji's plane crash was never above doubt since the begining, in absence of the files people will try all possible clues to find out the truth, Netaji was not a small leader whom all the people in India would forget, most will, but not all.
It is not about catching at straws ...
I highlight it because its an obvious indication how disinformation spreads and how people jumped to believe in whatever they are presented with the moment they have made up their minds to believe in something ...
Well just on the basis of one picture ...without cross checking the antecedents so called research scholar gave a long mumbo jumbo about Netaji being in USSR and Siberia ...that all talk was centred around single picture and so called heater which did not exist in first place ....
was it so difficult for this research scholar to verify actual sources of the picture ?
no ..but she just saw picture in Russian archive and jumped to the conclusion that it could be taken USSR ...
how naïve of research scholar to believe in something like that ?
Do you get the point I am trying to put across ?
I am saying people do not think rationally and do not process information objectively ....
People like the research scholar and people like you are moved by their emotions ....
emotions which overwhelm the logical thinking ...
It is not me but you who is trying desperate to put all the news items related to mystery of Netaji's death ...
and in the process you have no time to think what you are posting will stand test of scrutiny or not ...
If an average reader like me can ask sensible questions and can just by a moment of internet search foil the obvious speculation that your research scholar has posted ...then what about hundreds of other so called research articles ?
selective reporting where caption is deliberately keep ambiguous and wrapped with that caption is all disinformation and speculation ..just to rouse the emotions of frail minded followers ..and feed their feeble minds with doubts ...is the agenda of most news papers .
such kind of irresponsible reporting stems from the desire to increase the readership rather than throw light on truth ...
Unfortunately naïve people like you fall pray to this very kind of propaganda .
You seem rather disturbed due to the fact that how I have nailed the obvious blunder in one of your post .
Now you offer me to post the link for disclaimer by the author ?
I do not need it ...because I did not believe in the nonsense to begin with .
why did you not post the disclaimer along with the very article you posted ?
It was very dishonest of you to hide the disclaimer if you knew it beforehand ...
Next time you better verify the extravagant and ridiculous claims the article make before posting it here . or be prepared to be grilled and countered .
If I had not pointed the obvious flaws in that article ...it would have been deemed as another ' fact' that supports so many theories about Netaji being in USSR that are floating around ...
People like you who blindly post the stuff floating around do more damage by acting like a vectors for further propagation of such misinformation ...