What's new

Sri Lanka Defence Thread

8000 is a faux. Real count is more than 15000 were killed during the final phases of the war.
How do you know what is a hoax and what is the truth? what sources do you have?
Two investigations revealed that the number of death is around 8000.

By lakhs I actually meant the number of civilians killed including the past.
Then why did you say 15000 first and now by lakhs? Did you fail maths?

You cannot justify killing civilians in chunks stating LTTE had them as hostages.
Who is justifying? First we dont consider it as a wrong. The only reason for civilian deaths is the LTTE.

SL had waged the same operation in East. But there was no cries about human rights bla bla when the operation in east was going on...why? because the top LTTE leader was not in East. The moment the offensive was turned against LTTE top level in wanni...they tried to show care for the 'civilians' . :)

If your army really cared of Lankan Tamils they should have first saved the hostages before killing LTTE big heads.
Yes that is why 300000+ was saved. given food, medicine,temporary house to live....
Actually SLA has acted very much honourably than many armies.
SLA saved civilians at the cost of its soldiers...A fact acknowledged by ICRC as well.
If SLA did not care for civilians the war could have been finished with much less soldier casualty.

Read something before talking about it.
They didn't do that but rather they found a chance to avenge their racist thoughts by killing the innocent hostages (Tamils).
Do you understand that in a war, people die? And that there is a greater probability if one party held a human shield.
The SLA protected the people that is why Mr.Idiot 300000+ people came alive to SL defence side.
SLA 's target was to kill the terrorists and they went for the kill.

Majority of tamils live in south. And if SL wanted to kill tamils, killing tamils in south is the best option. And they could have killed in Jaffna and in East...
When an army is killing its own people there is no difference between them and the LTTE.
All are the same, butchers.
When the so called own people are terrorists yes then it is correct. And i am extremely happy they killed them.. And i hope they had a painful death.

Then why did civilians die in the final phases of the war ?
Because idiot in a war collateral damage is common. Go and read the history or read anything on any war conducted in any part of the world. In all the wars, people die . No matter where it is in vietnam, or iraq or laos or cambodia or afganistan, in a war people die. That is why war is bad.
SL didnt wage war, SL defended a war to eradicate ruthless terrorists. A terrorism that ravaged the country and killed its people for 30 years. And yes SLA wont come back without killing the LTTE top brass.

300,000 survived. Do you think Sri Lanka would survive had these 300,000 been killed ?
SO you are now saying that there was no mass civilian deaths?

There is the catch. It was targeted killing or a small-scale genocide.
small scale? LOL...

The war itself was used as a tool to eradicate Tamils by many in the Sri Lankan authority.
Yes...we are the one to start a war..

We do not need to any UN report to understand that.
Yes then who told you?
Don't think of me as a Tamils or LTTE sympathizer.
No you seem like idiot of first order
They used the LTTE as a reason to butcher civilians
And they forgot to butcher and viola 300000 came to SLA side

This thaniOruvan fellow comes with his nonsense in every SL thread and flees when the SLns here give a good kick in the butt. But wait some time and return with his nonsense again. I have answered this retard more than once..And i gave him to watch this.

After being kicked this fellow will once again come with his nonsense again.
 
Last edited:
.
How do you know what is a hoax and what is the truth? what sources do you have?
Two investigations revealed that the number of death is around 8000.


Then why did you say 15000 first and now by lakhs? Did you fail maths?


Who is justifying? First we dont consider it as a wrong. The only reason for civilian deaths is the LTTE.

SL had waged the same operation in East. But there was no cries about human rights bla bla when the operation in east was going on...why? because the top LTTE leader was not in East. The moment the offensive was turned against LTTE top level in wanni...they tried to show care for the 'civilians' . :)


Yes that is why 300000+ was saved. given food, medicine,temporary house to live....
Actually SLA has acted very much honourably than many armies.
SLA saved civilians at the cost of its soldiers...A fact acknowledged by ICRC as well.
If SLA did not care for civilians the war could have been finished with much less soldier casualty.

Read something before talking about it.

Do you understand that in a war, people die? And that there is a greater probability if one party held a human shield.
The SLA protected the people that is why Mr.Idiot 300000+ people came alive to SL defence side.
SLA 's target was to kill the terrorists and they went for the kill.

Majority of tamils live in south. And if SL wanted to kill tamils, killing tamils in south is the best option. And they could have killed in Jaffna and in East...

When the so called own people are terrorists yes then it is correct. And i am extremely happy they killed them.. And i hope they had a painful death.


Because idiot in a war collateral damage is common. Go and read the history or read anything on any war conducted in any part of the world. In all the wars, people die . No matter where it is in vietnam, or iraq or laos or cambodia or afganistan, in a war people die. That is why war is bad.
SL didnt wage war, SL defended a war to eradicate ruthless terrorists. A terrorism that ravaged the country and killed its people for 30 years. And yes SLA wont come back without killing the LTTE top brass.


SO you are now saying that there was no mass civilian deaths?


small scale? LOL..you are one retarded son...


Yes...we are the one to start a war..


Yes your mother's lover told you..right?

No you seem like idiot of first order

And they forgot to butcher and viola 300000 came to SLA side

This thaniOruvan fellow comes with his nonsense in every SL thread and flees when the SLns here give a good kick in the butt. But wait some time and return with his nonsense again. I have answered this retard more than once..And i gave him to watch this.

After being kicked this fellow will once again come with his nonsense again.

Lets keep the profanities and personal attacks out machun.. Lets not devalue the counter point.. Cheers
 
.
SL bombs by LTTE......found these recently...


Bomb blast in Akuressa mosque
 
Last edited:
.
Yes your mother's lover told you..right?

Man avoid from these kind of low level personal attacks. Why attack his mother? Its extremely uncivilized to attack anyone's mother like that
 
.
Man avoid from these kind of low level personal attacks. Why attack his mother? Its extremely uncivilized to attack anyone's mother like that
I edited what I write, because as Gibbs said it kinda devalue my point.
I dont have any regard for enemies of SL and i will insult them if i want. Keep your advice to your self
 
.
This thaniOruvan fellow comes with his nonsense in every SL thread and flees when the SLns here give a good kick in the butt. But wait some time and return with his nonsense again. I have answered this retard more than once..And i gave him to watch this.


After being kicked this fellow will once again come with his nonsense again.

Good video.. Explains much better and nullifies most of these propagandists than actually trying to make sense to them
 
.

LTTE bomb targetting a tamil gover minister and children in a marathon rally
 
.
Man, the butchering Tamil thing and the Genocide things are proven lies. Bullets don't see who is a civilian or enemy.
In a life or death situation you can easily mistake someone for an enemy and shoot. Sri lankan forces don't see who's tamil who Sinhalese and there were several incidents of LTTE suicide bombers mixing with refugees and blasting themselves up in refugee camps.
As soon as the war ended Red Cross created hospitals in refugee camps so butchering Tamils won't be possible right?

There is a differnec between intentionally killing Tamils and accidently killing them and they took a major risk in taking tamil refugees in without checking


UN Report Is Well-Balanced And Unbiased: FM Mangala Samaraweera

Mangala.jpg


UN Report Is Well-Balanced And Unbiased: FM Mangala Samaraweera | Colombo Telegraph
 
.

Two bombs targetting civilians in Colombo. One bus was close to Moratuwa University I was studying then. One of our senior university undergrat was killed in it.
 
.
I edited what I write, because as Gibbs said it kinda devalue my point.
I dont have any regard for enemies of SL and i will insult them if i want. Keep your advice to your self

Does not justify insulting anyone's mother like that. You are not insulting him but someone else who has nothing do here
 
.
UN Report Is Well-Balanced And Unbiased: FM Mangala Samaraweera
api methana indian karayek ta kana palenna denawa..e assata panala api athara waliyak hadanna epa...oka wena thanaka kathakaranna

Does not justify insulting anyone's mother like that. You are not insulting him but someone else who has nothing do here
I think I dont give a fuuuk



 
.
api methana indian karayek ta kana palenna denawa..e assata panala api athara waliyak hadanna epa...oka wena thanaka kathakaranna


The Sri Lankan government under Ranil and Sirisena has accepted the UN report in toto which states that Sri Lankan government forces and Tamil Tiger rebels most likely committed war crimes including mass killings of civilians during the long conflict and that it should be prosecuted by a special court with international judges.

The Sri Lankan government even co-sponsored a resolution at the United Nations. Sri Lankan soldiers are to be tried in a special court for war crimes and crimes against humanity with international involvement.

I don't understand why anyone here is arguing with ThaniOruwan. The Sri Lankan government agrees with him.
 
. .
Ex-navy commander to report to PRECIFAC today

Former navy commander Somathilake Dissanayake has been asked to report to PRECIFAC today to record a statement on the controversy with regard to the floating armoury belonging to Rakna Arakshaka Lanka Ltd.

A senior official of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry to Investigate and Inquire into Serious Acts of Fraud, Corruption and Abuse of Power, State Resources and Privileges (PRECIFAC) told Daily Mirror that the former navy commander was summoned to clarify certain matters that had arisen with regard to the evidence recorded earlier in this connection.

Former defence secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa, current Defence Secretary Karunasena Hettiarachchi and Rakna Arakshaka Lanka Ltd Chairman Victor Samaraweera were earlier summoned by the Commission to record their statements.

Ex-navy commander to report to PRECIFAC today ::: Dailymirror.lk ::: Breaking News
 
.
How do you know what is a hoax and what is the truth? what sources do you have?
Two investigations revealed that the number of death is around 8000.


Then why did you say 15000 first and now by lakhs? Did you fail maths?


Who is justifying? First we dont consider it as a wrong. The only reason for civilian deaths is the LTTE.

SL had waged the same operation in East. But there was no cries about human rights bla bla when the operation in east was going on...why? because the top LTTE leader was not in East. The moment the offensive was turned against LTTE top level in wanni...they tried to show care for the 'civilians' . :)


Yes that is why 300000+ was saved. given food, medicine,temporary house to live....
Actually SLA has acted very much honourably than many armies.
SLA saved civilians at the cost of its soldiers...A fact acknowledged by ICRC as well.
If SLA did not care for civilians the war could have been finished with much less soldier casualty.

Read something before talking about it.

Do you understand that in a war, people die? And that there is a greater probability if one party held a human shield.
The SLA protected the people that is why Mr.Idiot 300000+ people came alive to SL defence side.
SLA 's target was to kill the terrorists and they went for the kill.

Majority of tamils live in south. And if SL wanted to kill tamils, killing tamils in south is the best option. And they could have killed in Jaffna and in East...

When the so called own people are terrorists yes then it is correct. And i am extremely happy they killed them.. And i hope they had a painful death.


Because idiot in a war collateral damage is common. Go and read the history or read anything on any war conducted in any part of the world. In all the wars, people die . No matter where it is in vietnam, or iraq or laos or cambodia or afganistan, in a war people die. That is why war is bad.
SL didnt wage war, SL defended a war to eradicate ruthless terrorists. A terrorism that ravaged the country and killed its people for 30 years. And yes SLA wont come back without killing the LTTE top brass.


SO you are now saying that there was no mass civilian deaths?


small scale? LOL...


Yes...we are the one to start a war..


Yes then who told you?

No you seem like idiot of first order

And they forgot to butcher and viola 300000 came to SLA side

This thaniOruvan fellow comes with his nonsense in every SL thread and flees when the SLns here give a good kick in the butt. But wait some time and return with his nonsense again. I have answered this retard more than once..And i gave him to watch this.

After being kicked this fellow will once again come with his nonsense again.

I can give a hard kick on your face with my counter argument.
As I have already discussed with more sane people from your country already I am not interested to waste my time on a 'Bigot' like you. Cheers.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom