I know exactly what kind of things you're talking about, they seem to support MB parties overseas but I wouldn't call them MB themselves. Some of them that attend these mosques or community centers are good people but others who like to control narrative too much are usually hypocritical and see themselves too highly. But you can say this is the case with all our mosques/community centers nowadays. Those who control narrative/agenda whether MB, Salafi, Sufi or so on tend to be our worst bunch. Talk religiously and put on outward pious appearance but steal money, look for attention all the time, sin more than others and way too arrogant. Also shape their political views based off worldly interests/preferences and not clean approach which is only intended to please God.
I thought what happened with Nouman Khan was ridicilious, he simply sough to marry it appeared and such private matters should never be leaked. Some people must have been jealous of him. Such private matters should never be released to public and especially something not controversial like that. Humans are not perfect and God made us to sin. That cancel culture we have is wrong too. This is why I don't get involved with any of my mosques or community centers when it comes to decision making/setting narrative/deciding agenda. Those in control will push others out and people in general don't want to hear the truth which can be brutal, boring, and too hard to accept. They prefer to live in imaginary rosy world.
Muslim Brotherhood of USA is a unique amalgamation of various MB factions (most prominently Syrian, Egyptian, Palestinian, and smaller ones.) Many migrated to the US around the 70s-80s when they had problems in their home countries with their governments. Although at many times they are antagonistic and have different goals, for example Egyptian MB is more amiable and open to other Muslim groups than the Syrian version. Between them there are some common themes.
1. Attaining political power is the primary goal, all other things are secondary.
2. This should begin internally in the Muslim community (masjid boards and organizations.)
3. Potential rivals should be humiliated, fought against publicly, and eliminated to help the goals.
4. Never should they go against the government in which they live
openly, and compromising religion is acceptable to meet those ends.
5. Rivalries within MB should be kept within, and not exposed.
6. Secret meetings should take place to further objectives and create unity within the organization.
So we see that true to its name and founding,
the Society of the Muslim Brotherhood stays true to its roots as being a secret society modeled after the Free Masons and Shriners.
This is how they destroyed our American Muslim community, utterly divided us, and are now promoting this LGBT, anti-shariah, and progressive nonsense in our name. We also saw that during the time of Bush's election, MB campaigned heavily for him. MB has been shaming and chastising Muslims who do not vote (for their platform and favored politicians) since that time. Every masjid is used to further this mass bullying against Muslims to push them into their party's plans.
Not to mention that such things are not allowed in a house of worship, it disrupts the sanctity and peacefulness of such a holy place.
You will never hear them talk about genuine religious solutions for fixing the Muslim society, such as fixing the relationship of youth with the Quran, Sunnah, and Seerah, acquainting us with Islamic history, or bridging gaps between various Muslim communities in the US.
Allah swt has given us the solution of all problems if we study the Prophet saws and his life. In none of those did he bully people to vote in a Non-Muslim society for Non-Muslim candidates, compromise basic obligations of Islam to become accepted by other groups, but instead he peacefully preached the message of Islam to the masses, facing all sorts of persecution until the command of Allah swt came to make hijrat and establish the state of Madina with the full support of the people of the city,
whose hearts had been melded to carry the burden.
There is a reason Sayyed Qutb was so opposed to them at the end of his life, after joining them and studying them from the inside. He rejected their innovations in religion, and rightly so.
They already erected Ranjit Singh Kana's statue in Lahore. He was the person who had used Badshahi mosque as a stable and was hanging people in front of Wazir Khan mosque. Muslim leader Syed Ahmad Shaheed fought against Sikh rule and sacrificed his life in the process. Shamelessly, a sitting minister boasted about "Punjabi supremacy" when he announced his plans to build Ranjit Singh's statue
He also tore apart one of the famous gates of Lahore, Shah Alam Darwaza, because it was named after the son of Sultan Aurangzeb Alamgir, may Allah swt be pleased with them both.