What's new

South China Sea Arbitration News & Discussion

Yes, tibet wants to be freed of chinese yoke. Will support that
You can go to Tibet ask all the people there, if they want to stay with China or India

Yes, tibet wants to be freed of chinese yoke. Will support that
You can go to Tibet ask all the people there, if they want to stay with China or India

Probably true.
But we are discussing here, how the ruling is going to effect the nations involved in South China issue. India is not a party to it.
Actually your goverment is also support us, as we all do not want Western intervene the Asia CASE. This should be discussed by Asian.
 
.
The UN just issued a statement saying“ Hague tribunal does not belong to UN and has nothing to do with UN"

Actually it is just a fake agency set up by US and Japan to try to embarrass china, nothing more. But those dumb indians buy it and cheer for it. Take your time, indians. we will soon bring up your massacre crime in Kashmir into UN. We will show you what the real UN looks like.

As for those jumping viets and pinoys, be quite and your happy time is over.
ye-cheez-mere.jpg
 
.
Translation:
International Court of Justice
is the only official judicial institution of United Nation, located at the Hague Peace Conference, Netherlands. the Hague Peace Palace was owned by Carnegie Foundation. The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) only happen to be renting the same building where International Court of Justice is and the UN has nothing to do with the PAC.

Carnegie Foundation? that's so convenient!!!:lol::lol:
translating weibo blog?

Chinese seem becoming desperate after the UN ruling.

the seat of the PCA is irrelevant. it can be in the Netherland or Vietnam or yes, even on the Moon.

also, irrelevant whether PCA owns the building or not.

what matters is PCA is authorized by the United Nations, and specified in the Unclos articles.

Get it?
 
. .
If China wanna become next U.S or next Super-power, at least BeiJing should learn how to refuse U.N rules as same as U.S government ever did in Cold War and Iraq War time lead by U.S.A.

1st lesson BeiJing should learn, it's doing what good for ur interest and International rules & regulations only made by the stronger not the coward.
 
Last edited:
. .
translating weibo blog?

Chinese seem becoming desperate after the UN ruling.

the seat of the PCA is irrelevant. it can be in the Netherland or Vietnam or yes, even on the Moon.

also, irrelevant whether PCA owns the building or not.

what matters is PCA is authorized by the United Nations, and specified in the Unclos articles.

Get it?
first it is official weibo of united nation. (cause we don't use facebook or twitter)
http://weibo.com/un?refer_flag=1005055014_&is_hot=1
second they make it clear that PCA has no realtion with united nation.

also you can watch and check what the un spokeman said in New york yesterday.
http://www.un.org/chinese/News/story.asp?newsID=26478
don't see it in report? because what he said is not interest for western median.
actually a Japanese journalist asked him if both parties need to comply with the judgment. :-)
 
Last edited:
.
translating weibo blog?

Chinese seem becoming desperate after the UN ruling.

the seat of the PCA is irrelevant. it can be in the Netherland or Vietnam or yes, even on the Moon.

also, irrelevant whether PCA owns the building or not.

what matters is PCA is authorized by the United Nations, and specified in the Unclos articles.

Get it?

PCA isn't a UN body. It may be mentioned in a UN treaty but it is not funded by, staffed by or endorsed by the United Nations.

China is a responsible member of the United Nations, proven by a track record of minimal vetoes and support for human development in all forms.
 
.
translating weibo blog?

Chinese seem becoming desperate after the UN ruling.

the seat of the PCA is irrelevant. it can be in the Netherland or Vietnam or yes, even on the Moon.

also, irrelevant whether PCA owns the building or not.

what matters is PCA is authorized by the United Nations, and specified in the Unclos articles.

Get it?
It is the official weibo acount of UN in China, But I bet you are too dumb to figure it out.
 
.
It is UN. The news is all across the world. Seem Chinese government has resorted to propaganda.
 
.
July 12, 2016
Asian nations welcome South China Sea ruling

171e3bcc-41fa-4d6f-b25f-f69b41cf2295.img
©AP

Vietnamese nationals cheer during a rally by the Manila Bay on Tuesday to show their support for the Philippine case before the UN tribunal

Asian countries locked in maritime disputes with China welcomed the legal victory won by the Philippines over China’s claims in the South China Sea on Tuesday and urged Beijing to respect the verdict in the interests of regional peace and security.

Confrontations over competing claims to the waters have escalated as China continues to build artificial islands in the sea, threatening security and dividing the capitals of the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations.

Perfecto Yasay, the Philippine foreign secretary, called for China to comply with the ruling, handed down by a UN tribunal in The Hague, as part of efforts at “promoting and enhancing peace and stability” in the region.

“The Philippines strongly affirms its respect for this milestone decision as an important contribution to ongoing efforts in addressing disputes in the South China Sea,” he said.

The judgment is the first big test for Rodrigo Duterte, the new president of the Philippines. He has promised to improve relations with China but will be under domestic pressure to take a hard line after a judgment so favourable to Manila.



Some observers have questioned whether he may already have reached a deal or understanding with Beijing, although nothing has been said officially by either side.

Hanoi, which has a bitter maritime territorial rivalry with China in the South China Sea, welcomed the ruling and called for territorial quarrels in the region to be resolved using “diplomacy and legal processes” rather than armed force.

Anti-Chinese riots broke out in Vietnam in 2014 after the arrival of a Chinese oil rig near the contested Paracel Islands, causing severe damage to industrial zones.

Japan said it “strongly expects” that compliance with ruling by the two parties would “eventually lead to the peaceful settlement of disputes in the South China Sea”. Tokyo has a separate conflict with Beijing in the East China Sea over a chain of islands known in Japan as the Senkaku and in China as the Diaoyu.

But some analysts say Beijing is likely to respond to Tuesday’s legal setback with a show of strength in the affected areas.

“The ruling . . . potentially limits China’s negotiating stance on the disputed maritime area with other countries that also assert claims there, namely Brunei, Malaysia, Taiwan and Vietnam,” said Amarjit Singh, senior consultant for country risk at IHS. “However, initially, China’s reaction to the ruling can be expected to be assertive.”

23609070-483c-11e6-8d68-72e9211e86ab.img


Multiple territorial disputes have caused tensions within Asean, where countries such as the Philippines and Vietnam are pitted against China-leaning Cambodia and Laos, the regional grouping’s current chair.

Beijing has accused some nations, including Vietnam, of doing their own island building.

Hun Sen, Cambodia’s prime minister, has previously accused The Hague tribunal of political bias. A Cambodian government spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Tuesday.

Thailand, which is not engaged in any maritime dispute with China, called for a code of conduct governing the South China Sea, reflecting efforts by other Asean members to find an agreed way forward.

Singapore urged all parties to “fully respect legal and diplomatic processes”.

“We support the peaceful resolution of disputes among claimants in accordance with universally recognised principles of international law . . . without resorting to the threat or use of force, ”
a spokesman for Singapore’s ministry of foreign affairs said in a statement.

The city state has no territorial claims in the South China Sea but is a small open economy that relies on free trade and unhindered navigation.

Malaysia’s ministry of foreign affairs issued a statement calling for the implementation of the Declaration of the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea, a 2002 agreement signed by China and Asean to refrain from occupying uninhabited reefs and shoals.

Malaysia, which has staked a territorial claim in the South China Sea, called for all sides to exercise restraint and avoid the use of force, saying it believed a peaceful resolution was possible with respect for international law.

Ian Storey, a senior fellow at Singapore’s Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, said that “given the divisions within [Asean], and China’s ability to exploit those divisions by putting pressure on certain members to do its bidding”, the organisation was unlikely to endorse The Hague verdict when members meet later this month.







This map seems like, Vietnam is small, then they will get the sea to be fatter??
The line shows, wow~~ It will be same size as China, hahaha
Calm down, guys, that's impossible, dream is nice, but reality is so cool.

Did not understand your Chinese English...better you type in Chinese...will try to translate.


You like this work? hehe, My English is poor, but not means every one can do not understand it~~
 
. .
We have already built comprehensive infrastructures on those islands, and we are going to build more. like it or not, we are going to stay and gradually, I would say,20 years maximum, vacate all other countries from this region. UNCLOS is not a prison, once its members find that it is not fair and just, they can always choose to back out of it or simple not to join, like US did.

Even British chose to quit EU, same case here in this situation.
 
. .
Is Taiping island or shoal after you read those photos, the first impression?
View attachment 317158
Taiping in 1946

Followings are Taiping in recent years:
View attachment 317160 View attachment 317161 View attachment 317162 View attachment 317163

@Doordie @kankan326 @T-Rex @Rain Man @Tiqiu @Zero_wing @william Huang @hirobo2 @Sinopakfriend @Nilgiri @etc.

Thank you for Historical reference. If you can find Japanese surrender maps...you will see the nine dash line as chinese territory... The Chinese government will never accept anything else. One is certain that they will find good solution with ASEAN neighbours with friendly dialogoue and negotitation. But the Chinese will never be intimidated. The Chinese people will never accept another century of humiliation. People must realise that. Especially those who wish to see China destroyed.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom