South China Sea Arbitration News & Discussion

[xunzi]

Now that you have your rule, who have the ball to come challenge our territorial integrity?

 

[danger007]

Lol an Indian call China thief, we haven't finished with you yet for stealing our South Tibet region, you don't think you gonna get away by diverting us to SCS issue...nice try.

whatever floats your boat... don't let them sink..

 

[xunzi]

Unilateral ruling is never a good rule, especially one that is acting way above its legal permission.

 

[xunzi]

UNCLOS' dispute resolution mechanism is quite separate from rest of U.N.

We will see.

Perhaps it will end with the Filipinos enjoying the islands China is making for them, while China foots the bill for environmental remediation from the destruction it wreaked in their creation.

When are you going to come to take our islands? We are waiting...

 

[S10]

I hope Xingiang is next. Its about time our brothers get their freedom from the Commies.

You can't even spell Xinjiang right, retarded Indian troll. Ain't nobody falling for your gimmick.

 

[xunzi]

Of course Paul Reichler is happy. He just earn his millions and bonus.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

whatever floats your boat... don't let them sink..

we have unsinkable carriers in SCS, you just made an empty talk

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

Not yet.

Not too far back, you didn't claim the sea the way you have today. Then you claim. Then you use force to back up your claim.

Same-old same-old.

The claim dates back to the 1930's at the latest.

 

[xunzi]

How can you accept a unilateral rule? It makes no sense. What we did is uphold international law of sovereign state the option to use peaceful negotiation.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Unilateral ruling is never a good rule, especially one that is acting way above its legal permission.

Unilateral ruling is like sing a song for themselves.

 

[Pandora]

Yeah...Am sure the Pakistani government will write a very strong letter of support to Beijing.

http://nation.com.pk/international/...-pakistan-support-china-on-sea-issue-diplomat

No offence BUT for a Professional you seem awfully frustrated that no one is taking this news seriously. Did you stop and start to think that no one gives a damn and this world has got bigger fish to fry. Considering the mess Americans have made in middle east who would follow you blindly? Euorpeons? Common wealth Nations? UK? France? Germany? Who knows maybe if Donald trump get elected he will demand it away from china

The reality is that not even SCS nations will follow you if you Americans decide to embark on another one of long list of failures.

 

[Nilgiri]

Decision won't have any immediate effect, except Chinese Keyboard Warriors will have zero
credibility here at PDF when they try to argue that Chinese have any historical right to the area.
The real argument now is that Chinese will be bullying their neighbours because they can,
not because they are right.

Perfect way of putting it. Spot on.

 

[Nilgiri]

The problem with this Chinese objection is that China had already ratified, in other words: had agreed to, the UNCLOS which included a very specific legal clause that fundamentally says that if there are any dispute or disagreement over whether a court/tribunal has jurisdiction or not, then the court/tribunal will be the one that has the final say about its jurisdiction. Yes, the court/tribunal will get to decide on it, not the dispute parties. It may sound unbelievable to some Chinese now, but that is what China had ratified and agreed to lol.

Its the spoiled brat syndrome + middle kingdom ego.

 

[Mangus Ortus Novem]

PK is doing the most proper thing by supporting the rightful Chinese position. Act of a true friend.

When all the dust settles their position will be validated. It is just the first voice...more such voice will come forward. Sanity must pervail.

 

[Nilgiri]

PK is doing the most proper thing by supporting the rightful Chinese position. Act of a true friend.

Any official press releases?