What's new

So What PAF Capability is Hurting IAF, Mr Dhanoa ?

Even this dude's hair got burned due to high level of intelligence he has.
Intelligent and programmed to nurture over a billion Ostriches on regular basis.
One of these characters while commenting on a flypast was exuberantly calling smoke contrails being generated by the SU-30s as......Stupendous Artistry. :D
 
aissa wessa chutiya.....I pray next IAF chief should be of same caliber ...good for PAF.....after reading his thoughts.... I think @tallguy rightly claimed that we shotdown 08 ACs on that day.

It is 8 aircraft not one more or one less...soon very soon it will be open may be after modi take oath 30th May.
 
It is 8 aircraft not one more or one less...soon very soon it will be open may be after modi take oath 30th May.

If it will be the official line and accepted...I will send you Mithai Package ...where ever you are...
 
It’s a thousand years old problem!!!

  • Muhammed bin Kasim vs Sindhi King ( they were inefficient back then too)
  • Sultan Mahmut vs Somnath Temple in Gujrat (with tons of gold inside)!! Modi is partially compensating it via Rafael deal
  • Aybek vs Prithiraj (representing the North India)
  • EbdAli vs Maratha (representing Hindutuva)
  • Jinnah vs Nehru (representing Chanakya)
  • Etc...
 
Seems IAF is full of them.


''As far as airborne intercept radars are concerned, clouds have no effect. Clouds only show up on weather radars. The fellow is just trying to cover up Modi's nonsense.'' (Words of a PAF Officer).

@Oscar @Hodor @Irfan Baloch @Knuckles @Mangus Ortus Novem
Rain has an affect on radar versus cloud for the specific frequencies Air Intercept radars operate in.
So had he mentioned rain - yes it would be valid.
 
Seems 27th is a bad date for the IAF, it was on 27th May 1999 that IAF lost two aircraft during the Kargil conflict.
Today the IAF Chief of Air Staff, flew a missing man today, 20 yrs later, to honour his fallen comrade....all that is very well but just look at the state of the MiG aircraft that was supposedly flown by the Indian Airchief.




D7jrF0VXsAQIV1N.jpg


D7j47YQVUAACa8x.jpg
Our Mirages and F-7s are approaching that level for some airframes- what is odd for the IAF is that they seem to be putting in more hours on their older jets in an attempt to allow the newer ones to be worked harder in a future engagement.

Or maybe it has to do those assets committed to ops versus the 21s now just kept behind the lines( unlikely as most frontline bases house 21s)
 
Seems IAF is full of them.


''As far as airborne intercept radars are concerned, clouds have no effect. Clouds only show up on weather radars. The fellow is just trying to cover up Modi's nonsense.'' (Words of a PAF Officer).

@Oscar @Hodor @Irfan Baloch @Knuckles @Mangus Ortus Novem
Bhai yeh sirf Modi ka muah ma la rha ha , as you know that IAF air chief is retiring and this guy is also in the line to become the next air chief....

Seems 27th is a bad date for the IAF, it was on 27th May 1999 that IAF lost two aircraft during the Kargil conflict.
Today the IAF Chief of Air Staff, flew a missing man today, 20 yrs later, to honour his fallen comrade....all that is very well but just look at the state of the MiG aircraft that was supposedly flown by the Indian Airchief.




D7jrF0VXsAQIV1N.jpg


D7j47YQVUAACa8x.jpg
Seat ki pooshish bhi honay wali ha:p:
 
Tell them about the Russian Ambassador in GHQ, requesting details of the MKI shoot down to be kept out of the limelight
Sir how true is this statement....? M seriously interested to know....
 

Look at the rats face.

And surprise surprise, no one in India has the brains to raise this point or ask the question.
It were the same clowns talking about able to fight two front war and claiming that their MiGs are enough to decimate the PAF.

LOL I have been hearing this Indian line since my childhood. Indian flying coffins are enough to take care of entire PAF.

Today the Indians are begging for Rafale to save the day. It seems the whole IAF got compromised on the 27th.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom