Six countries support India in rejecting OHCHR report on Kashmir

[SQ8]

A report is just a report, its useless until someone acts on it. How many reports have been published on the Rohingya? Have they actually affected Myanmar's actions. Plus if you actually read the report, you'd know it places some blame on Pakistan for cross border violence.
Anyway, the purpose of this thread was that six countries Actually object to it. Now is there any country willing to approve an anti India UN resolution? That would still be symbolic, but still significant. The answer is none because Turkey and China have refrained from openly condemning India.

For whatever reasons, its called self interest. China does have some serious human rights violations against its eastern population, so far Pakistan has not raised a single voice because it is not in our interest.

Right now Donald Trump isnt saying a thing to Russian collusion when the entire justice system is pointing at it? What do you think is the reason?

 

[GumNaam]

Out of those millions, only a few are rebelling. You are forgetting that number includes Jammu and Ladakh as well, which are pro India. Only a handful of districts in Kashmir division are anti India.

Dozens of indian soldiers getting killed every day is only "few" rebelling? Even america didn't loose troops at this rate in Vietnam, Iraq or afghanistan, get your money back from your math teacher dude!

 

[Cobra Arbok]

Why do you ask a question for which there is ample public data available? What is the point of such a aimless and childish question ? Throughout UN history Pakistan has had the support of a variety of countries on a variety of issues. Kashmir is a know flashpoint where both Pakistan and India lobby; in this case India found weak nations to push against a single report which ironically only its own newspapers covered in a spate of typical Indian yellow journalism.

So what is point of this thread? Do you want to get cherry points for bashing Pakistan?
If that is so then I will throw you and every other piece of Indian out of this thread out here for self pleasuring by bashing Pakistan.

I know throughout history Pakistan has had several supporters, but that is irrelevant to the ground realities of today.

Dozens of indian soldiers getting killed every day is only "few" rebelling? Get your money back from your math teacher dude!

DO you have a source for that? Only a handful of soldiers a week are killed in Kashmire. About the same as FC soldiers killed in Balochistan. Anyway our Army is bigger than yours, so we have more resources to spare on Kashmir.

 

[SQ8]

I know throughout history Pakistan has had several supporters, but that is irrelevant to the ground realities of today.

It could be, today is different from tomorrow. In the 90's Pakistan bought hardware from Israel, today we dont.
In the 1980's Zia had to charm Rajiv out of a possible conflict because we weren't capable of defending ourselves, today we can lay waste to 80% of India so we negotiate differently.
Today I face idiots from Indian call centers signing up on this forum and hence have taken an aggressive stance against them, tomorrow when they tone it down I will too.

 

[Cobra Arbok]

For whatever reasons, its called self interest. China does have some serious human rights violations against its eastern population, so far Pakistan has not raised a single voice because it is not in our interest.

Right now Donald Trump isnt saying a thing to Russian collusion when the entire justice system is pointing at it? What do you think is the reason?

That was what I was trying to get someone to say. As long as Pakistan's "allies" such as Turkey are too concerned with self interest to actually sponser a resolution, it does not matter how many reports the UN publishes. THe fact we have several countries openly support us is symbolic of our diplomatic influence. Anyway I don't think there is anything left to discuss, so it looks like I am done here. I definitely was not expecting to face your wrath on my first day here though.

 

[GumNaam]

I know throughout history Pakistan has had several supporters, but that is irrelevant to the ground realities of today.


DO you have a source for that? Only a handful of soldiers a week are killed in Kashmire. About the same as FC soldiers killed in Balochistan. Anyway our Army is bigger than yours, so we have more resources to spare on Kashmir.

Abay go look up your own media reports. And the terrorists you sent in fata and balochistan during the peak 3 years ago still didn't cause that many fatalities. your army is only 1.2 million. That leaves you only 500k troops to deploy on the international border with Pakistan and China while both fata and balochistan have stabilized so we have nearly the full army of 800k to deploy against india. FC is more than capable of handling balochistan and fata now that it is a part of kpk. ab tera kia hoga kaalyaaaaaaaaa!

 

[Cobra Arbok]

That was what I was trying to get someone to say. As long as Pakistan's "allies" such as Turkey are too concerned with self interest to actually sponser a resolution, it does not matter how many reports the UN publishes. THe fact we have several countries openly support us is symbolic of our diplomatic influence. Anyway I don't think there is anything left to discuss, so it looks like I am done here. I definitely was not expecting to face your wrath on my first day here though.

As I promised, I am done posting on this thread.

 

[GumNaam]

As I promised, I am done posting on this thread.

Abay phat gayi teri? yeh tau ro diya, bhaag giya bhagorra, apni dum daba kay bhaagti sena ki tarha!

 

[Corona]

It's nice of them to support, but the world public isn't even aware of this with the exception of India because of our coverage of the report. In the end, it doesn't even matter. New cover, same song.

 

[Peshwa]

Yawn!
Wake us up when someone actually has the balls to arm twist us on Kashmir.
We know our position is of strength, when it becomes weak, that’s when we should worry.
The support is good, but means little. What means more is that not a single country’s or UN action against India will be initiated based on this report.
Enough said!
Peace

 

[Shahzaz ud din]

No Bangladesh,no Sri lanka,no Nepal and no Maldives

 

[Trango Towers]

Meanwhile how many countires support Pakistan? Does your Iron brother China? You'd expect them to be more vocal advocates for your cause considering you basically sold your economic sovereignty to them.

Pakistan can face the world alone thats why we are still there and your biggest problem

 

[UnitedPak]

Belarus supporting India means that Russia subtly supports India as well.

So lets calculate these. That would be 6 supports, 1 subtle support, 2 soft supports, 1 really soft support, 2 hard supports, 14 silent supports, 8 sympathy supports and yet the UN slap across Indias face is still audible across the globe.

Being a super soft power has its drawbacks I guess.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

Bhutan supported india, so it means india had wide support in the world.

 

[Cobra Arbok]

So lets calculate these. That would be 6 supports, 1 subtle support, 2 soft supports, 1 really soft support, 2 hard supports, 14 silent supports, 8 sympathy supports and yet the UN slap across Indias face is still audible across the globe.

Being a super soft power has its drawbacks I guess.

Not as loud as we hear across the border every time we kill a "freedom fighter"