Six countries support India in rejecting OHCHR report on Kashmir

[Novice09]

Pakistanis are really going crazy... talk to us if there is any ACTION on this biased report by UN...

Till then keep your dirty hound tied by leash...

we are already in process of removing art 35A and 370 is in pipeline... you will get lots of stuff for propaganda...

 

[Pakistansdefender]

Even Afghanistan,
The savier of Islam....
Wao.
What you sow, so shall you reap.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

So lets calculate these. That would be 6 supports, 1 subtle support, 2 soft supports, 1 really soft support, 2 hard supports, 14 silent supports, 8 sympathy supports and yet the UN slap across Indias face is still audible across the globe.

Being a super soft power has its drawbacks I guess.

 

[Crystal-Clear]

Not one single country supported the OHCHR or Pakistan and 6 countries even joined in on rejecting the report. Tells us a lot about Pakistan's diplomatic clout.

as per your claim we make this report . think about our ties with UN .

Lolz bc modi 4 saal tak ghumta raha or in 6 ko jama ker paya .

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

When did they have any support,they are worried about the countries supporting us forgetting they have none .

as per your claim we make this report . think about our ties with UN .

Lolz bc modi 4 saal tak ghumta raha or in 6 ko jama ker paya .

Let's look at Indian foreign policy success as of today:

Cuba Venezuela Mauritius Belarus Bhutan Afghanistan

But... but... Modi baboon sarkar ji says India is super power and not isolated.

 

[Cobra Arbok]

Let's look at Indian foreign policy success as of today:

Cuba Venezuela Mauritius Belarus Bhutan Afghanistan

But... but... Modi baboon sarkar ji says India is super power and not isolated.

Those are countries. You do know what countries are, right? Now tell me, are there any countries that openly support Pakistan in UN?

 

[Clutch]

Six countries have joined India in rejecting the report prepared by the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR).


They are: Two from Asia (Bhutan, Afghanistan), one from Africa (Mauritius), one from Eurasia (Belarus), and two from Latin America (Cuba, Venezuela).

During the 'General debate on the overall update of the High Commissioner on the situation of Human Rights worldwide and on the activities of his office' at the Human Rights Council, the Kashmir report was discussed, these six nations rejected the report authored by Zeid Raad Al Hussein.

While Pakistan's permanent representative to UN in Geneva, Farukh Amil, made an ardent appeal on behalf of his own country to establish a commission of inquiry in Jammu and Kashmir, he did not have much to add when he spoke on behalf of the OIC (Organisation of Islamic Cooperation).

"The OHCHR report on Jammu & Kashmir also points to a grave situation in Indian Administered Kashmir and needs appropriate follow up by this council," said the Pakistan envoy on behalf of OIC.

Not a single country came out in support of either Pakistan or the OHCHR report on Kashmir, while many questioned the timing and the veracity of the report itself.

In its first-ever human rights report on Kashmir, the UNHRC has called for international inquiry into multiple violations in the undivided Jammu and Kashmir.

The 49-page report details human rights violations and abuses on both sides of the Line of Control, and highlights a situation of "chronic" impunity for violations committed by security forces.

The situation is not a comfortable one for India since Pakistan is a member of the Human Rights Council and can affect change whereas India is not.

Many have called the methodology of collecting data for this report a "fallacious" one.

First, the report was drafted on using remote monitoring, without any rigorous cross-verification on the ground, amounting to biases of individuals and media reports creeping into the report.

Bhutan's representative Kinga Singye made a very strong statement against the OHCHR report raising the issue of terrorism which the High Commissioner seemed to have missed out in his report on the ground situation. Bhutan also requested the HRC to not take action on the report.

The Mauritian representative, Israhyananda Dhalladoo, questioned the assessment on Kashmir and stood with India rejecting any third party intervention.

This report of OHCHR in respect of the human rights situation in Kashmir does not provide a balanced assessment of the situation on the ground," said the Mauritian envoy.

In today's world where reality and appearances are usually opposite to each other..... The world supports those who are strong rather than those who have a strong case.

Pakistan and free kashmirs have a strong case; unfortunately they are not strong.

But with PTI and the Naya Pakistan ... We will also become the strong again!

Patience! Truth always triumphs falsehood over time.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

In today's world where reality and appearances are usually opposite to each other..... The world supports those who are strong rather than those who have a strong case.

Pakistan and free kashmirs have a strong case; unfortunately they are not strong.

But with PTI and the Naya Pakistan ... We will also become the strong.

Patience! Truth always triumphs falsehood over time.

آمين إن شاء الله

 

[Crystal-Clear]

Let's look at Indian foreign policy success as of today:

Cuba Venezuela Mauritius Belarus Bhutan Afghanistan

But... but... Modi baboon sarkar ji says India is super power and not isolated.

modi is an illiterate man and to be honest he is a man without any vision and team (we saw what he did in so called note ban) .
.
.
his politics revolves around hate towards minorities in india ( the only reason why hindus vote him) .

 

[Imran Khan]

the only other two star countries left were NK and Israel

india can say MERY ANMOOL RATAN

 

[Hamza913]

Okay so which "villages and posts" did you capture in 1971? nothing.

Chamb sector, which is still under our control.

Certainly seems like a bigger achievement considering we still retain control over it, and I'm sure there are other examples.

The fact is, in 1971 Hindustan only had won on the eastern front. On the western front, nobody achieved anything significant enough to call themselves the victor.

And we did not lose territory in Kargil, we secured the territory

Yes you did, and it took you 2 whole months to take back 75% of it, despite outnumbering our forces 6 times over, and getting air support as well as resupplies (both of which our forces did not have.

We only evicted most of the remaining 25% of Kargil because of political pressure being applied on Musharaf by the US and the rest of Pakistan. Even then, we still retained several key areas of Kargil such Point 5353 which is the dominating feature, giving us authority over the area.

I repeat, we have not lost an inch of Kashmir since 1947, we have only gained territory.

Clearly you have lost parts of Kashmir post 1947.

And even if we are in a CIvil War, we are not losing 200 people in blasts.

You lost over 12,000 people during the heyday of the Khalistan movement, 40,000 people since 1979 due to the insurgency in northeast Hindustan, and 40,000 people in Kashmir since the 90's.

https://www.oneindia.com/india/punjab-militancy-there-have-been-12-000-civilian-deaths-1818756.html

http://ploughshares.ca/pl_armedconflict/india-northeast-1979-first-combat-deaths/

https://tribune.com.pk/story/228506/40000-people-killed-in-kashmir-india/

And let's not forget some of the other violent incidents that have occurred in Hindustan:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Gujarat_riots

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Mumbai_attacks

You're also still the 8th most terror affected country on the planet, so there's nothing for you to gloat about:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/maps-and-graphics/Mapped-Terror-threat-around-the-world/

India has already bested Pakistan militarily

Only in 1971 and during the Siachen conflict, meanwhile Pakistan has bested Hindustan militarily in 1947, 1965 and in 1999.

Ever since we got nuclear weapons, your country realised that 1971 could never be repeated again.

We continue to pound your forces along the LOC and send soldiers into Kashmir to attack your forces, all you can do is sit and remain on the defensive.

 

[Cobra Arbok]

Chamb sector, which is still under our control.

Certainly seems like a bigger achievement considering we still retain control over it, and I'm sure there are other examples.

The fact is, in 1971 Hindustan only had won on the eastern front. On the western front, nobody achieved anything significant enough to call themselves the victor.



Yes you did, and it took you 2 whole months to take back 75% of it, despite outnumbering our forces 6 times over, and getting air support as well as resupplies (both of which our forces did not have.

We only evicted most of the remaining 25% of Kargil because of political pressure being applied on Musharaf by the US and the rest of Pakistan. Even then, we still retained several key areas of Kargil such Point 5353 which is the dominating feature, giving us authority over the area.



Clearly you have lost parts of Kashmir post 1947.




You lost over 12,000 people during the heyday of the Khalistan movement, 40,000 people since 1979 due to the insurgency in northeast Hindustan, and 40,000 people in Kashmir since the 90's.

https://www.oneindia.com/india/punjab-militancy-there-have-been-12-000-civilian-deaths-1818756.html

http://ploughshares.ca/pl_armedconflict/india-northeast-1979-first-combat-deaths/

https://tribune.com.pk/story/228506/40000-people-killed-in-kashmir-india/

And let's not forget some of the other violent incidents that have occurred in Hindustan:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Gujarat_riots

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Mumbai_attacks

You're also still the 8th most terror affected country on the planet, so there's nothing for you to gloat about:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/maps-and-graphics/Mapped-Terror-threat-around-the-world/

Chamb is not as much as the territory in Baltistan we won through the Shimla Treaty. Name me any significant part of Kashmir India lost? The fact is after 4 wars, the status quo remains, with India being slightly favored. And the Mustang Blast occurred weeks ago, whereas everything else you posted happened decades ago. Maybe India was really violent and unsafe back then, but now, it is obviously better than Pakistan.
Anyway, this thread was not about military, but diplomacy. Which countries support Pakistan on Kashmir.?

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

The fact is after 4 wars, the status quo remains, with India being slightly favored.

This is completely your own opinion.

Anyway, this thread was not about military, but diplomacy. Which countries support Pakistan on Kashmir.?

Why do Indians have a habit of asking the same questions again and again, expecting a different answer? The answer will be the same every time. Turkey and China. Sometimes Iran, Indonesia, Malaysia, KSA, UAE, Palestine step up also. For the latter countries, it depends on which way the wind is blowing.

 

[Hamza913]

Chamb is not as much as the territory in Baltistan we won through the Shimla Treaty.

After the Simla treaty you gave back almost all the land taken AFAIK, I'd like a source that proves otherwise.

Name me any significant part of Kashmir India lost?

Azad Kashmir and Gilgit Baltistan.

The fact is after 4 wars, the status quo remains

Not at all, the status quo would be Hindustan having complete control over all of the Kashmir region, and Pakistan retaining authority over the Bengalis. That's not the case, Hindustan has lost control of 40% of the Kashmir region, the other 60% is riddled with insurgency, Bangladesh got independence, and Pakistan gained control over parts of Hindustan such as Chamb and small amounts of Kutch.

We currently occupy more Hindustani territory than vice versa.

Maybe India was really violent and unsafe back then, but now, it is obviously better than Pakistan.

Not by that much, as explained before, we are 5th in the world when it comes to how much terrorism we suffer from, where as you are 8th.

Which countries support Pakistan on Kashmir.?

Don't know don't care.

 

[t_for_talli]

Look at the name of those countries

Supa puwa

Not even China / KSA / Turkey supported PAK
Count is zero for PAK

so 6 countries out of how many UN members in total?? 200 plus??

OHCHR there are 45 counties
No one stood up for Pakistan , Not even China , count is zero