Should Pakistan do Surgical Strikes in IOK?

[masterchief_mirza]

Of course the risk is that they counter disproportionately with a land invasion.

 

[Secret Service]

No, i dont think we should do anything in haste. Just play the game in the region like we did with the Russians in 80s. Bring in the Afghan Taliban and disrupt the Afghan peace process and put some pressure on US. Make them clear that they cant exist Afghanistan safely without support/US intervention on Kashmir. Indians cant stay in Afghanistan and Iran, and i am sure ISI knows how to kick their a$$.
Start arming Kashmir people, ignite other minorities and freedom movements in india. Get help from Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri lanka. China and Turkey should help us in raising the issue in UN SC and world forums.
India has opened a new war on us, lets exercise every possible option we have.

 

[YeBeWarned]

Will it help Kashmir Cause ? NO ? wait for India to do something and than don't limit your response unleash the hell on IA forces .

 

[Ultima Thule]

None of this will happen in the near future. Pakistan simply doesn't have any options but to seat back and watch. They are financially and militarily not in any position to do so. Whatever they have done till now in diplomatic front makes little difference to India or perhaps to any world power, they are simply not interested in the squabbling of this two subcontinent nations unless of-course it goes to the brink of atomic warfare. I just hope there is no loss of human lives.

Because you're hyper power of the universe, you have the weapons that would 1000000000000000000 times better then USA/Israel/Russia/China, you're Tej@$$ has a space jump capabilities @swnjo What happen at /26/27 FEB we destroyed your Mighty IAF ego by destroying 2 IAF Jets (MIG-21/MKI) @swnjo

 

[iby32]

I agree. This will provoke them to go to war. And it will be good for us because THEN we'll be fighting defensive war in our own territory which we are very good at, rather than going on offense.

We can not take iok by defensive war have to be offensive and take war to enemy territory so coltrale damage suffered by them not us

 

[Cygnus Black]

We can not take iok by defensive war have to be offensive and take war to enemy territory so coltrale damage suffered by them not us

We can take it to the enemy after we wear them down through attrition in our territory, just like how Soviets did to the Nazis.

 

[Armchair]

Indian racist supremacy culture will cause them to react disproportionately to surgical strikes against units committing human rights violations. They will come at us hard across all fronts possibly, allowing us to make maximum damage, wear them out, and then take the offensive at a point of our own choosing.

if you mean to say the Indian style mythical Uri revenge surgical strike then I volunteer for it

if you mean real stuff then the I am confused with many things

explain the scope of the attack and the method and the target and the expected result and the expected reaction

what will it achieve? India gets scared reinstates 370? recalls all its troops?
or it opens a war front of its choosing where we are week? uses its diplomatic leverage against us?

I am on neither side just want to discuss the pros and cons of both arguments. Such a strike could act as a bait for India to attack, allowing us to wear them out and then, at a certain point, go on the offensive. Think Yarmouk and Soviet retreat against Nazis.

 

[Irfan Baloch]

Indian racist supremacy culture will cause them to react disproportionately to surgical strikes against units committing human rights violations. They will come at us hard across all fronts possibly, allowing us to make maximum damage, wear them out, and then take the offensive at a point of our own choosing.



I am on neither side just want to discuss the pros and cons of both arguments. Such a strike could act as a bait for India to attack, allowing us to wear them out and then, at a certain point, go on the offensive. Think Yarmouk and Soviet retreat against Nazis.

Wear them down maybe china can ( in isolation of rest of the world)
Not us

 

[Dil Pakistan]

Here is my take on whether Pakistan should go to war with India:

1). You may remember the news that Israel took the delivery of THAAD system few months. My conclusion at that time was that this war on terror is about to enter into a new phase.

2). Soon after that the US carrier strike group has been stationed within a striking distance of Iran. At one point it looked like that there will be a war, but it fizzled out. So much so that US even ignored the downing of one of its drones by Iran. Clearly, a conflict at that time did not coincide with the planning of military strategists. They are waiting for the "right time" to start the war.

3). Very recently, the US army has been allowed to be stationed inside KSA.

4). Now, out of the blue, this Kashmir issue has erupted.
For the reasons above, I am not prepared to look at it in isolation. It has long been known that neutralizing Pakistan is an important milestone to be achieved in order to achieve the objectives in the middle east. If Pakistan goes to war with India, and even if is not neutralized, she will definitely remain engaged for a significant time and will definitely become less resourced for another conflict. The next war to happen after the Pakistan and India war is the attack on Iran and then the middle east. Israel is very close to make an attack on Al-Aqsa mosque and start building the third temple. For this, Pakistan and Iran need to be taken care of.

Now, in the context of above four points, Pakistan MUST NOT go to war with India. In addition, a war with India counters the military strategy of Pakistan; i.e., to fight India without firing a bullet.

If Pakistan enters this war it cannot stop the events in the middle east, which is the main objective of those conducting the war on terror.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

Here is my take on whether Pakistan should go to war with India:

1). You may remember the news that Israel took the delivery of THAAD system few months. My conclusion at that time was that this war on terror is about to enter into a new phase.

2). Soon after that the US carrier strike group has been stationed within a striking distance of Iran. At one point it looked like that there will be a war, but it fizzled out. So much so that US even ignored the downing of one of its drones by Iran. Clearly, a conflict at that time did not coincide with the planning of military strategists. They are waiting for the "right time" to start the war.

3). Very recently, the US army has been allowed to be stationed inside KSA.

4). Now, out of the blue, this Kashmir issue has erupted.
For the reasons above, I am not prepared to look at it in isolation. It has long been known that neutralizing Pakistan is an important milestone to be achieved in order to achieve the objectives in the middle east. If Pakistan goes to war with India, and even if is not neutralized, she will definitely remain engaged for a significant time and will definitely become less resourced for another conflict. The next war to happen after the Pakistan and India war is the attack on Iran and then the middle east. Israel is very close to make an attack on Al-Aqsa mosque and start building the third temple. For this, Pakistan and Iran need to be taken care of.

Now, in the context of above four points, Pakistan MUST NOT go to war with India. In addition, a war with India counters the military strategy of Pakistan; i.e., to fight India without firing a bullet.

If Pakistan enters this war it cannot stop the events in the middle east, which is the main objective of those conducting the war on terror.

Intriguing perspective.

 

[Dil Pakistan]

 

[iby32]

We can take it to the enemy after we wear them down through attrition in our territory, just like how Soviets did to the Nazis.

Soviet were too big on land had strong industrial base to support and continue supply and had a very large army.

 

[Mrc]

No hasty decisions .

Inevitably kashmiris will retaliate. . Indians will try some thing funny ... Thats ideal time to retaliate massively

 

[xyx007]

We have psychologically big victory over Hindu Baniya Army, they are not enough experience in battle otherwise they were not easily let it go their huge investment in Afghanistan.and we have experience of two superpower Indian Baniya only good in building library where Hindu terrorist can spread their terror which is easy cake is to encounter them when we attack. I Love to see that CM who have wish for marry our kashimir daugther/sisters for . .and show ourself how we are protecting

 

[khansaheeb]

As long as Pakistan has prepared for the consequences and the aftermath that should be fine. Worst case scenario which Pakistan needs to plan for is a long Iran-Iraq type war fueled by our enemies.