Bah,Give me a break.Nudity in art are nothing new so does the pornography.Just look at the Google trends,You people are one of the largest searchers of internet pornography.Every body watch **** and there is nothing wrong in that,So cut the hypocrisy.
Which is why I asked, would you allow it on public display in the big metropolitan cities of India like on billboards or street corners where even your kids can see them?
Lack of Salafis are compansated by Deobandis in Pakistan.Darool Uloom Haqqania rings any bell.Which is ofcourse the birth palace of Taliban.
Deoband is a place in UP, India where all of this literature originated so are we to assume that India is the root of all these problems?
I have nothing against Deobandis and do not believe they are to be equated with terrorism or extremism as I don't indulge in broad generalizations like the person who made them.
I believe the vast majority of them are peace-loving people like the Tableeghi Jamaat who is completely indifferent towards any politicization.
Therefore, I condemn the broad and xenophobic generalization made by this bigot.
Sorry, I just wanted to be on record with regard to this.
Why don't you read Usool-ad-Deen (Roots of the Religion) - five Shi'a Islamic beliefs and Furoo-ad-Deen (Branches of the Religion).
For twelver Shiites one of the 10 Ancillaries of the Faith is J*ihad.For Ismailites Ji*had is one of the seven pillars of Islam.Why don't you use your brain and learn more about it before coming to argue with me.
For the Ismailis, it is meant to be something else
I am sure some Ismaili is reading this somewhere is doing this
It means something completely different to them and it is more of a spiritual thing but in common knowledge, it is assumed to be something else and that is why it is also censored on this site.
Your textbooks are purposely presenting Islam and Muslims as bloodthirsty war mongers.
Also, the issue was with the sixth tenet, whilst there are only five.
Every book or the most basic education in world religions distinguishes between the nuances in the beliefs of different divisions within a faith. You are also doing the same thing by clarifying the differences.
What we see here is that this book has made a broad generalization and made the word, which has bad connotations in the world, to seem as though it means that for everyone else whilst for Ismailis and Shiites, despite being a tenet, does not have that same meaning.
I mean this is the most basic of information available to everyone.
They've done a very disturbingly mischievous thing and it is something that even you are aware of.
Blah,The point of education is to give students a perspective that are in line with the realities in the societies.Not to please people with vested interests.Its the best way avoid creating prejudicies in students mind,such as the case of yours.Yours idea that we don't believe in eating meat is just another case of prejudice.
And, therefore, the book would include that in its "aside" column. That, although, that's what it means, most Hindus don't mind eating it, in practice, today.
Is that what the book was doing there? No.
It is making broad generalizations about what the word means as it is mixing all the sects together whilst taking the word from one sect (for whom it means something else) and applying it to the entire Muslim belief so as to give the wrong impression about what Muslims truly believe.
They were traders kiddo.They enjoyed patronage of various Arabs rulers.That's how they did trading.
There is historical proof of Arab traders being in contact with the Philippines, Malaysia and Indonesia yet, no proof of their "Hakeems" in the courts of those who existed before them.
Why don't go and learn the history.Martin Luther lived at a time when the renaissance was at its zenith in Europe,during the time when Michelangelo was painting his master pieces in the roofs of Sistine chappel.And know that renaissance continued through out 16th century till the end of 17th century.protestant reformation started during renaissance.
You just told me history and did not prove a point in doing so.
Without realizing your own fault in the original post, you're confusing the most basic of cause vs effects issues.
You said that the Renaissance was caused by the Protestantism while the the truth is that Protestantism was an effect of it. You just admitted that and also stated that Martin Luther was present at its zenith, yet you're still debating this issue only to continue diversion from the issue of India's weaknesses in respecting the sensitivities of its minorities in its education system.
Furthermore, Martin Luther would have never found the apocryphal books had there been no Renaissance because research or looking too much into the faith was discouraged as the clergy had kept its complete control on it - thus, the dark ages.
Some stories of One thousands and one nights are indeed based on the fabulous court of Harun al-Rashid fifth Abbasid caliph in Baghdad.Its a historical fact,whether you like it or not.
It is fantasy and despite being "based" on them, they are not true. The characters could just have been inspired by Persian kings but we would never know about it. They are not a historical document.
Gotti,
you seem to know something but it is a far shot of the real picture,even if you come and live amongst people in TN,you wont get it.
It is far from what you can imagine.
Did Tamil Nadu just become a land far, far away, mentioned in some fantasy film or fairy tale?
"You can't even find out even if you lived there for years"
I laughed because I knew you were joking.
Had you been serious or were trying to be, I would've still laughed, but, at you, instead.