What's new

Shivalik Class Frigates Thread

. . .
laid down in 2001, launched in 2003, still in sea trial in 2009?

:smokin: dude, we are completing Type-054a frigate every 12-18 months, how are you going to match with us?

tell you the truth dude, we will built another 100 navy ships comparable or better than the current 054a in the next 20 years, you simply can't match it. the USSR crashed because of the arm race, we are doing to it again on you.
 
.
why do u always hav to show china has this china has dat.....

we know ur way ahead of us.......dats a good thing for china....

but dont go runnin around tellin it to everyone........


btw......where was ur navy when japan almost took d whole country??

u didnt hav technology nor equipments.......right


so do we right now......wats wrong with dat......??

its jst we are fews years back.......so were you when japan attackd you

didnt you improvd frm that to become a force that one day d world will recognise........

arent you at par with japan navy right now?

so will we.........
 
.
laid down in 2001, launched in 2003, still in sea trial in 2009?

:smokin: dude, we are completing Type-054a frigate every 12-18 months, how are you going to match with us?

tell you the truth dude, we will built another 100 navy ships comparable or better than the current 054a in the next 20 years, you simply can't match it.

First no Type-054 is a match for Shivalik. Any version you pick.

Secondly the delays were mainly to systems changes, American sanctions on GE turbines (which were later removed by Obama) and so on.

The British Type-45 or French La fayette took 6 years from first steel cut to commission. The Shivalik (which was supposed to be commissioned in 2007) took 2 years extra for the above mentioned reasons.

the USSR crashed because of the arm race,

Wrong.

we are doing to it again on you.
Dream on.
 
.
laid down in 2001, launched in 2003, still in sea trial in 2009?

:smokin: dude, we are completing Type-054a frigate every 12-18 months, how are you going to match with us?

tell you the truth dude, we will built another 100 navy ships comparable or better than the current 054a in the next 20 years
, you simply can't match it. the USSR crashed because of the arm race, we are doing to it again on you.

good for china.. :)
What India is doing is something it can afford.. Actually its China which is in arms race with USA, Japan, Taiwan...
Wanting India to crash like USSR is only wishful thinking....
 
.
First no Type-054 is a match for Shivalik. Any version you pick.

Secondly the delays were mainly to systems changes, American sanctions on GE turbines (which were later removed by Obama) and so on.

The British Type-45 or French La fayette took 6 years from first steel cut to commission. The Shivalik (which was supposed to be commissioned in 2007) took 2 years extra for the above mentioned reasons.

:smokin: can I just ask why Type-054A can't match your fancy INS Shivalik? because we can make turbines, missiles, radars?
 
.
:smokin: because we can make turbines, missiles, radars?

Sorry copying (from Russians) is just ain't making

can I just ask why Type-054A can't match your fancy INS Shivalik?

Weaponary, stealth features, design, countermeasures.

GB

P.S:- This ain't India v/s China or Type-054 v/s INS Shivalik thread. Please refrain.
 
.
Sorry copying (from Russians) is just ain't making

really? can I just ask what is the Russian counterpart names for our YJ-62 missile or the Type-054a itself?

Weaponary, stealth features, design, countermeasures.

stealth? are you kidding me?

have a look please:
File:Shivalik long shot.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I will eat my keyboard is such 20 years old design can be called "stealth".

nationalism gets you nowhere.
 
.
really? can I just ask what is the Russian counterpart names for our YJ-62 missile or the Type-054a itself?



stealth? are you kidding me?

have a look please:
File:Shivalik long shot.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I will eat my keyboard is such 20 years old design can be called "stealth".

nationalism gets you nowhere.

This ain't India v/s China or Type-054 v/s INS Shivalik thread. Please refrain.

If you are so excited then open a x v/s y thread. Don't flame here.
 
.
Type-054/Type-054a


INS Shivalik


more stealth? why? because you have the india flag on your ship?

please show me some self respect and stop being a liar.

INS Shivalik is comparable to Type-054a at best, and the fact is Indian relies on imported engine/radar/missiles to build it. We have 5 Type-054a in operational use, 2 in building and the PLAN is not going to order any more of such 10 years old toys.

You can crying hard, but INS Shivalik is comparable to Type-054a at best.
 
.
impressive.......


i can see it clearly.........more stealth......yeh


but why did u ppl remove the tag, sayin "More stealthier than F47",


jst remind d navy next time to paint in big letters along side d 525
 
.
impressive.......


i can see it clearly.........more stealth......yeh


but why did u ppl remove the tag, sayin "More stealthier than F47",


jst remind d navy next time to paint in big letters along side d 525

Dude,

Please don't get into this v/s that thread.

I simply opened the thread to update people with new developments.

The guy Chinese guy came up with his my dick is bigger than urs arguument then let him be.

GB
 
.
impressive.......


i can see it clearly.........more stealth......yeh


but why did u ppl remove the tag, sayin "More stealthier than F47",


jst remind d navy next time to paint in big letters along side d 525

:smokin: no, I don't claim Type-054a to be better, I believe the hull is very similar. the problem here is some Indians believe its better than 054a just because there is an Indian flag on it.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom