Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is possible sir, they might want use J15 as non Carriers based option novy as wellThe J-15 story is getting more and more confusing!... and now here is J-15 no. 72!
While the renumbering from 1xx numbers to 01-24 made sense and the additional Batch 03 fighters logically became No. 30+, the No. 60 modex J-15 were or are still unusual.
My feeling tells me that we see a second squadron under construction with numbers 01-35 in the first wing and no. 60-xx in the second.
(Image courtesy of KTLJ via Huitong's CMA-Blog)
View attachment 734328
Once again a great read written by @RickJoe_PLA explaining why "rumors of the J-15’s unreliability have been greatly exaggerated"!
It’s Time to Talk About J-15, China’s First Carrierborne Fighter
Rumors of the J-15’s unreliability have been greatly exaggerated.thediplomat.com
Thanks a lot even if I only have slim hopes that this will be heard by those who constantly repeat such rumours.
I have developed the habit of double-checking and triple-checking news/reports from Taiwanese and Indian writers -- especially the articles are about China.According to Rick Joe, the rumors was started by a Taiwan-based news. That explained.
Incredible beastGreat image of J-15 no. 19 carrying 4 PL-8B short-range AAMs and 4 PL-12 medium-range AAMs.
(Image via Huitong's CMA-Blog)
View attachment 742722
Once again a great read written by @RickJoe_PLA explaining why "rumors of the J-15’s unreliability have been greatly exaggerated"!
It’s Time to Talk About J-15, China’s First Carrierborne Fighter
Rumors of the J-15’s unreliability have been greatly exaggerated.thediplomat.com
Thanks a lot even if I only have slim hopes that this will be heard by those who constantly repeat such rumours.