What's new

Shelling in Baramulla Kashmir by India

. .
The video is dark , how can any one recognize it as Baramullha , even Diwali crackers will give the same feel in complete dark and from bit distance ...only fools can believe such videos :)
 
. .
Can't see anything clearly so tbh it's a bit hard to believe
But if it is true than may Allah protect them. :(
image.jpeg


I was not believing it too. Then this actually made me believe. Also this video is shared by a Kashmiri.
 
. .
may god protect Kashmiris but let me speak something dictated by common sense (i know i might get a permanent ban for it but anyways) neither of our countries(not talking about common people here) want Kashmir to get its freedom because both of us will lose a great chunk of land to a new state so only two possible solution remains
1)joint control of kashmir like mushi envisioned.
2)making loc a permanent international boarder.
@Zibago
 
.
may god protect Kashmiris but let me speak something dictated by common sense (i know i can get a permanent ban for it but anyways) neither of our countries(not talking about common people here) want Kashmir to get its freedom because both of us will lose a great chunk of land to a new state so only two possible solution remains
1)joint control of kashmir like mushi envisioned.
2)making loc a permanent international boarder.

Why would you get a ban for posting sense??

That is true. Neither Pakistan nor India can afford an independent J&k - because it won't be allowed by China even if we withdraw.

The Chinese claim anything which was under them even for a day, and the Northern Areas along with Ladakh and Gilgit, were under Tibetan influence for brief period in history.

If both India and Pakistan withdrew, they will come in. This is what Kashmiris don't get.

LC needs to be made into IB. Anyone wants to shift out of Kashmir proper should go, and thus must be made into an iron clad agreement between India and Pakistan. Sense, but your 'ideological' nationalists will bay for blood if any such thing is planned - so stupidity will continue
 
.
LC needs to be made into IB. Anyone wants to shift out of Kashmir proper should go, and thus must be made into an iron clad agreement between India and Pakistan. Sense, but your 'ideological' nationalists will bay for blood if any such thing is planned - so stupidity will continue

I've said this in an earlier post of mine, one if the earliest. Those Kashmiri not happy in India, should leave peacefully. To move to where they feel they would be happy. Relocate. Complete the last remaining mass move of partition.

But where I do not agree is open borders. And free movement. That is never going to be acceptable or workable. We are a long long way away from an Indian Schengen. If ever.
 
.
Why would you get a ban for posting sense??

That is true. Neither Pakistan nor India can afford an independent J&k - because it won't be allowed by China even if we withdraw.

The Chinese claim anything which was under them even for a day, and the Northern Areas along with Ladakh and Gilgit, were under Tibetan influence for brief period in history.

If both India and Pakistan withdrew, they will come in. This is what Kashmiris don't get.

LC needs to be made into IB. Anyone wants to shift out of Kashmir proper should go, and thus must be made into an iron clad agreement between India and Pakistan. Sense, but your 'ideological' nationalists will bay for blood if any such thing is planned - so stupidity will continue
truth is we will have to include gilgit baltistan too in the plebiscite and let assume for a moment Kashmiri vote for freedom over come gilglt and baltistans votes to stay with us. we will lose our only land contact with china, cpec will go down the drain and china might lose interest in us taking all its investment away.we will lose our remaining rivers.and these are just few main points.
 
.
I've said this in an earlier post of mine, one if the earliest. Those Kashmiri not happy in India, should leave peacefully. To move to where they feel they would be happy. Relocate. Complete the last remaining mass move of partition.

Relocate? It's their land; when Americans, Mexicans, Algerians, Greeks (and so on) wanted freedom; they fought - they did not 'relocated'.

If you're occupying a land; the inhabitants of that land will resist. You have no right to tell them to "relocate".

The people of that land decide what to do; not you or India.

truth is we will have to include gilgit baltistan too in the plebiscite and let assume for a moment Kashmiri vote for freedom over come gilglt and baltistans votes to stay with us. we will lose our only land contact with china, cpec will go down the drain and china might lose interest in us taking all its investment away.we will lose our remaining rivers.and these are just few main points.
Gilgit Baltistan declared independance from Kashmir and then ceded to Pakistan after the 1947 war.

Gilgit/Balistani people have always been a different people with different culture, heritage and history from the Kashmiris. The region was forcefully annexed during Hindu Dogra rule.
 
.
Relocate? It's their land; when Americans, Mexicans, Algerians, Greeks (and so on) wanted freedom; they fought - they did not 'relocated'.

If you're occupying a land; the inhabitants of that land will resist. You have no right to tell them to "relocate".

The people of that land decide what to do; not you or India.


Gilgit Baltistan declared independance from Kashmir and then ceded to Pakistan after the 1947 war.

Gilgit/Balistani people have always been a different people with different culture, heritage and history from the Kashmiris. The region was forcefully annexed during Hindu Dogra rule.
but according to UN it has to be included in plebiscite whole area is disputed
 
.
Relocate? It's their land; when Americans, Mexicans, Algerians, Greeks (and so on) wanted freedom; they fought - they did not 'relocated'.

If you're occupying a land; the inhabitants of that land will resist. You have no right to tell them to "relocate".

The people of that land decide what to do; not you or India.

It's not their land only.

No more than the land I am living on belongs only to me and my family.

A nation is a collective. Within the boundaries of my nation a saat baara ensures only I get to use it.

Till my collective needs it for the greater good. Like a dam. Or an expressway.

Then I need to move. And my government will compensate me.

That is of course as long as I am a citizen. And am staying in India.
 
. .
Relocate? It's their land; when Americans, Mexicans, Algerians, Greeks (and so on) wanted freedom; they fought - they did not 'relocated'.

If you're occupying a land; the inhabitants of that land will resist. You have no right to tell them to "relocate".

The people of that land decide what to do; not you or India.


Gilgit Baltistan declared independance from Kashmir and then ceded to Pakistan after the 1947 war.

Gilgit/Balistani people have always been a different people with different culture, heritage and history from the Kashmiris. The region was forcefully annexed during Hindu Dogra rule.

Our family had been living in Lahore for many centuries, when partition happened my great grandfather has to leave all our property back in Lahore and start our lives from scratch in India. He only had 14 rupees in his pocket when he came to India. This just didn't happened to my family, but to 20 million people in 1947.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom