Sheikh Rasheed interview to Indian media

[Joe Shearer]

Actually Indian media had groomed a lot ever since they started interacting with Pak media... in earlier times they used to behave like dehati aurat. Still they fail to keep the context of discussion. When their question is answered they shit to American, Afghan and Iranian blames as evidence.

I don't know about all that, but this interviewer needs to go back to journalism school. He came out thoroughly incompetent.

i was damn right about u oldman, i damn was!


lol do u even know the background of this affair oldman?

dont embarrass yrself

Because I read it, after @Nilgiri tagged me. ".....an angle of attack of 600 kms......"

Nearly swallowed my tonsils.

That is why he correctly told you to stop prancing around pretending expertise, and to concentrate on your basic education.

 

[Umair Nawaz]

I don't know about all that, but this interviewer needs to go back to journalism school. He came out thoroughly incompetent.



Because I read it, after @Nilgiri tagged me. ".....an angle of attack of 600 kms......"

Nearly swallowed my tonsils.

That is why he correctly told you to stop prancing around pretending expertise, and to concentrate on your basic education.

lol and now go back oldman and read that thread whose post he had quoted on that day as well as gave the source of that thread....i dont have time to spoon feed an enemy soldier!

oh BTW that Mark 2's fatter fuselage validated my point and i was proved right....the mark 1 had only 1 hr internal fuel capacity of flight time, meaning the a/c had a range of mere 600km in a single flight as was reported by yr media before that i was quoting back then. And in that thread as well i wasnt even talking to that indian guy but to a pakistani expert who had corrected me in that very thread, but later even he agreed on mark-2 thread that mark 1 really had a 1 hr flight time internal fuel capacity.

 

[Nilgiri]

@Nilgiri


dont talk about conspiracy theories kid! i didnt mention any angle of attack! i mentioned its range which is 600km as reported by yr own media as it has a mere 1 hr internal fuel capacity....No wonder yr new teja model has a fatter fuselage with clearly more internal fuel capacity.

Anyways Stay on topic. Dont do what yr lawyer Harish Salve has done in ICJ ie waste its time by going off topic and bringing irrelevant issues.


isnt that funny that its coming from u, under whose throat indian state terrorism arguments dont go down, even though it is now clearly proven!

And quit evasively u have ignored my post directed at u as well as the topic in hand and have proven once again that yr no so goodie goodie mature cheerful man as u try to project yourself in here but you are afterall a typical indian afterall!!!!!!

All yr impressions and hardwork has died, and u are afterall what i had originally thought u were, An Enemy Soldier trained to invade and kill my kind!

U must try in Bollywood, i must admit u had me play by u for a while in this cover.

DO THE MATHS! 600 km "angle of attack"!

Then you go spouting racist/bigoted things about Karachi/Sindhis this and that, and get banned for your effort. (Good job promoting Pakistan unity buddy!....amply showing yourself with your own words ....essentially why 1971 happened)

That too when you aren't boasting about your "Pajero" or whatever it was in first place @Robinhood Pandey @ranjeet @Levina

You are a funny guy that gives me lot to chuckle about, never change buddy!

i didnt mention any angle of attack!

whose post he had quoted on that day as well as gave the source of that thread.

LOL:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/mala...ing-the-lca-tejas.596167/page-3#post-11115061

angle of attack is just 600 km........do the maths!

We will never let you live it down. It's just for a little fun at your expense, chill buddy

 

[Asian.Century]

 

[Umair Nawaz]

DO THE MATHS! 600 km "angle of attack"!

Then you go spouting racist/bigoted things about Karachi/Sindhis this and that, and get banned for your effort. (Good job promoting Pakistan unity buddy!....amply showing yourself with your own words ....essentially why 1971 happened)

That too when you aren't boasting about your "Pajero" or whatever it was in first place @Robinhood Pandey @ranjeet @Levina

You are a funny guy that gives me lot to chuckle about, never change buddy!





LOL:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/mala...ing-the-lca-tejas.596167/page-3#post-11115061

angle of attack is just 600 km........do the maths!

We will never let you live it down. It's just for a little fun at your expense, chill buddy

now read my conversation with Pakistanipower from post#43 onwards!, he corrected me that AOA is a different thing, and im talking abt a different thing all together, which BTW is now proved too, as we both have read the reports abt its questionable endurange and hence range as well as seen mark-2 model with a fatter fuselage for carrying more internal fueld then 1 hr flight time fuel it carried before.

 

[Joe Shearer]

lol and now go back oldman and read that thread whose post he had quoted on that day as well as gave the source of that thread....i dont have time to spoon feed an enemy soldier!

Angle of attack of 600 kms? You may have corrected it after being told you had made an egregious blunder, but that remark is burnt into the minds of everyone who had the misfortune to read it.

oh BTW that Mark 2's fatter fuselage validated my point and i was proved right....the mark 1 had only 1 hr internal fuel capacity of flight time, meaning the a/c had a range of mere 600km in a single flight as was reported by yr media before that i was quoting back then. And in that thread as well i wasnt even talking to that indian guy but to a pakistani expert who had corrected me in that very thread, but later even he agreed on mark-2 thread that mark 1 really had a 1 hr flight time internal fuel capacity.

Why are you repeating nonsense in order to cover up your tracks? You're just making it worse.

now read my conversation with Pakistanipower from post#43 onwards!, he corrected me that AOA is a different thing, and im talking abt a different thing all together, which BTW is now proved too, as we both have read the reports abt its questionable endurange and hence range as well as seen mark-2 model with a fatter fuselage for carrying more internal fueld then 1 hr flight time fuel it carried before.

You will NEVER live it down.

 

[Asian.Century]

FULL UNEDITED INTERVIEW

 

[Nilgiri]

or is it yours?

You got banned lol. I will have to read and see why lol. You get too hot headed sometimes buddy. Relax, take a chill pill, its an internet forum, life doesnt depend on it.