Actually it is going on in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Indonesia etc., and India has what, over a hundred groups it has designated as 'terrorist organizations'?
The fact that there is a 'war against terrorism' in Pakistan, that the Pakistani military is engaged in, indicates that Pakistan is fighting terrorism, not that it is supporting it. You have your logic screwed up here.
.
The UN has imposed sanctions on an organization, not on Pakistan, and Pakistan has fulfilled its responsibilities with respect to what those sanctions require. Again, nothing that implicates the Pakistani State or its institutions in terrorism.
I am not closing my eyes, you are insisting on propagating a POV that has no evidence substantiating it, and despite repeated requests to Indians and Americans to provide credible evidence of even one instance of Pakistan supporting terrorism, you have failed to do so.
Now if you want to call support for insurgents 'terrorism', then India and Indians need to accept that India is also a State sponsor of terrorism by virtue of its support for East Pakistani insurgents and the LTTE.
The Taliban were not a terrorist organization when they were supported, nor were the Kashmiri groups. Most of the Kashmiri groups have never condoned attacks on civilians. And our claims on Kashmir are not illogical - the requirement for plebiscite was a condition of accession, as well as a central part of the UNSC resolutions, both of which were agreed to and committed to by India.
The only 'illogical position' here is that of India's, that insists that its occupation of a people and territory is justified because '1 billion people want it'.