What's new

Shashi tharoor destroys british again

Hes a scumbag.

Selective amnesia is the word I believe. Portrays himself as the ultimate progressive individual when topics of British brutality in colonial India emerge, yet behaves in a completely opposite manner when Indian atrocities in Kashmir are pointed out. A politician to his core.

Yep mention Kashmir and he goes full throttle defensive and outright denial mode and yes blames the evil Pakistanis for it all , it's actually in the same program.


However here he is getting a new one ripped for him by Mehdi Hassan. The topic is about Kashmir.


01.21 "We have tried soldiers"
02.15 "Some claims are baseless"
3.30 "If terrorism stops we can talk"
03.52 "The nature of the Pakistani state".
04.31 "The casualties have occurred because the Indian sate has deployed soldiers to counter the terrorism from Pakistan"


But hey at least he has a go at the British he can be our friend...
 
. .
Yep mention Kashmir and he goes full throttle defensive and outright denial mode and yes blames the evil Pakistanis for it all , it's actually in the same program.


However here he is getting a new one ripped for him by Mehdi Hassan. The topic is about Kashmir.


01.21 "We have tried soldiers"
02.15 "Some claims are baseless"
3.30 "If terrorism stops we can talk"
03.52 "The nature of the Pakistani state".
04.31 "The casualties have occurred because the Indian sate has deployed soldiers to counter the terrorism from Pakistan"


But hey at least he has a go at the British he can be our friend...

This guy is full of nonsense
 
. .
Yep mention Kashmir and he goes full throttle defensive and outright denial mode and yes blames the evil Pakistanis for it all , it's actually in the same program.


However here he is getting a new one ripped for him by Mehdi Hassan. The topic is about Kashmir.


01.21 "We have tried soldiers"
02.15 "Some claims are baseless"
3.30 "If terrorism stops we can talk"
03.52 "The nature of the Pakistani state".
04.31 "The casualties have occurred because the Indian sate has deployed soldiers to counter the terrorism from Pakistan"


But hey at least he has a go at the British he can be our friend...

If our opposition elected Mr Tharoor as the PM candidate every educated,rational Indians will surely vote for Congress.
Even PM Modi like this guy.
A genuis indeed.

This guy is full of nonsense

That is why he worked in UN as under secretary General ,and if US didnt vote for Mr Moon he would have been Secretary General.
Nice logic
 
.
Yep mention Kashmir and he goes full throttle defensive and outright denial mode and yes blames the evil Pakistanis for it all , it's actually in the same program.


However here he is getting a new one ripped for him by Mehdi Hassan. The topic is about Kashmir.


01.21 "We have tried soldiers"
02.15 "Some claims are baseless"
3.30 "If terrorism stops we can talk"
03.52 "The nature of the Pakistani state".
04.31 "The casualties have occurred because the Indian sate has deployed soldiers to counter the terrorism from Pakistan"


But hey at least he has a go at the British he can be our friend...

Embarrassing really. Dilly dallies around questions, outright ignores questions that dont suit his agenda. Cannot be taken seriously at an intellectual level.
 
.
@Kaptaan
churchill had abject apathy towards Islam as well.

Winston Churchill 1899: “Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.”

I had to re-check that with snopes (fact checking website - found it to be true.

https://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/churchillislam.asp

also he (Churchill) was instrumental in getting Jews into Palestinian lands arguing that the Jews will make the desert bloom
one such gem:
"I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place."

more here:

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ihWyeQchBScC&pg=PA9&lpg=PA9&dq=palestine+royal+commission+report+churchill+red+indians&source=bl&ots=fqe10nKhWa&sig=GcbUowychoxzbRVPV9CYbqkB1T8&hl=en&sa=X&ei=quhAVFji1e4G_ceAsAU#v=onepage&q=palestine royal commission report churchill red indians&f=false
 
Last edited:
.
churchill had abject apathy towards Islam as well
I know all that but we must measure people with reference to their time. When Churchill was saying this the so called "oldest democracy and bastion of freedom" USA still had no Negro vote and was mostly segregated. And you know and I know while what he said was often caustic but it had more then grain of truth in it. Islam being retrogressive? I think you know and I know if that statement is valid - look at KSA.

If you look at your great Gandhi you will know there are aspects of his life that are quite controversial. And we know about his views about Blacks in Africa were not exactly politically correct but again he was man of his times. We can't apply our measures on the past.

bro i don't like british people either, but this guy is a special kind of harami
Was it not for the British people that you don't like there would have had been no Canada to migrate to or born to.
 
.
Tharoor is a "scumbag" as stated so eloquently by @DESERT FIGHTER He is making up history with the theme "India, perfect India, India, rich India, India, centre of universe India" and the fable that if the British had not arrived India today would have been another USA.

The truth is if the British had not arrived there would have been no India. That is a fact. As much as if British had not arrived in Australia there would have been no Australia.

Lol at another USA:lol:
 
.
Was it not for the British people that you don't like there would have had been no Canada to migrate to or born to.
whabout this lovely place
upload_2018-2-1_0-59-52.png
 
. . .
@waz his interview with Al Jazeera alongside Former Pakistani Ambassador Hina Rabbani Khar was a classic example of his shortsightedness, he fails to see what he doesn’t want to. Despite several credible UN reports of state sponsored violence in IoK he fails to see a problem with the way his government acts and frankly praises his government but then tweets anti-BJP. He is a confused man.
I would say I have represented the British Empire and independence better in my EPQ, in a fair view for all three parties.
 
.
Although he has many points, he isn't the first to have stated the actions of the empire, British historians have as well.
But watch his views when he is asked about Indian actions in Kashmir. He's quick to point fingers but outright denies India has done anything wrong, and blames Pakistan for what's going on.
Personally I find Shashi Tharoor a hypocrite.

On one hand he criticizes British imperialism. Okay.

But when it comes to Indian occupation of Kashmir, he goes in denial mode.

Shashi Tharoor shouldn't be taken that seriously like Fareed Zakaria.
 
.
@waz his interview with Al Jazeera alongside Former Pakistani Ambassador Hina Rabbani Khar was a classic example of his shortsightedness, he fails to see what he doesn’t want to. Despite several credible UN reports of state sponsored violence in IoK he fails to see a problem with the way his government acts and frankly praises his government but then tweets anti-BJP. He is a confused man.
I would say I have represented the British Empire and independence better in my EPQ, in a fair view for all three parties.
You don't have to be BJP to be nationalistic or ultra conservative.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom