What's new

Shashi tharoor destroys british again

Good point, sticking up for national interest.
Yeah, even you would expect the same thing from the politicians in your country. No matter what they say in Pakistan against the govt to gain brownie points, You wouldn't want them to bash the govt policies in international media.
 
.
Lol :lol:
He is the most neutral Indian in that case .
Majority others are even nationalist than him.
First unified Bharat was established by Mauryan dynasty ,then its gone .
Now we are the one follow that rich culture

Doesn’t matter if he’s from Congress or BJP, He’s a hypocrite playing to the gallery, without the Brits creating educational institutions and making English the language of thier newly created colony, Tharoor would probabaly be a illiterate pheasant slaving away at a high caste Brahmin in Kerala.. Indian public is notorious for believing nationalistic hyperbole, Blaming everyone else for thier societal ills

Maurya’ns never ruled all of what is now known as India, They didn’t get past the Deccan plateau nor the North Eastern Asiantic states..also they couldn’t hold on to the land they conquered by wars for more than a century, So no there was no Bharat except in mythical Hindu literature before the Brits created a colony called India alamagating dozens of fiefdoms at war with each other
 
.
Doesn’t matter if he’s from Congress or BJP, He’s a hypocrite playing to the gallery, without the Brits creating educational institutions and making English the language of thier newly created colony, Tharoor would probabaly be a illiterate pheasant slaving away at a high caste Brahmin in Kerala.. Indian public is notorious for believing nationalistic hyperbole, Blaming everyone else for thier societal ills

Maurya’ns never ruled all of what is now known as India, They didn’t get past the Deccan plateau nor the North Eastern Asiantic states..also they couldn’t hold on to the land they conquered by wars for more than a century, So no there was no Bharat except in mythical Hindu literature before the Brits created a colony called India alamagating dozens of fiefdoms at war with each other

A SriLankan's opinion doesnt carry much weight in this case .
Everything Brits did was for their own benefit not ours .
When we became world most rich 17th century ,everyone want its piece and tried centuries for that .That is another case.
You dont know Kerala nor you know Mr Tharoor .
I know both because I am a Keralite and Tharoor is from our capital city .

Mauryans ruled upto Mysore .Tamil Kingdom surrenderd to them without a fight ,because they had already saw what happened to Kalinga .
Mauryan dynasty had around 180 years of pan Indian Rule.
We still follow their legacy .

Whether you likes or not ,Indians have their own identity that links from each other
 
.
Tharoor is a "scumbag" as stated so eloquently by @DESERT FIGHTER He is making up history with the theme "India, perfect India, India, rich India, India, centre of universe India" and the fable that if the British had not arrived India today would have been another USA.

The truth is if the British had not arrived there would have been no India. That is a fact. As much as if British had not arrived in Australia there would have been no Australia.
At least use a plausible analogy. Australia exists because the Anglo-Saxons are present in Australia in large numbers. That's not the case with India.

By the way, by the few posts I have read, it seems you are not bothered about Kashmir issue. At least not as much as other PDF members do.
 
.
I noticed that he never even answered the question relating to how "India" would have emerged without the British. Cheeky Shashi.

Modern nation states emerged from colonization. Without British there would have been no India or Pakistan. Most likely the princely states would have becomes independent nation states like Europe.
 
.
Doesn’t matter if he’s from Congress or BJP, He’s a hypocrite playing to the gallery, without the Brits creating educational institutions and making English the language of thier newly created colony, Tharoor would probabaly be a illiterate pheasant slaving away at a high caste Brahmin in Kerala.. Indian public is notorious for believing nationalistic hyperbole, Blaming everyone else for thier societal ills

Maurya’ns never ruled all of what is now known as India, They didn’t get past the Deccan plateau nor the North Eastern Asiantic states..also they couldn’t hold on to the land they conquered by wars for more than a century, So no there was no Bharat except in mythical Hindu literature before the Brits created a colony called India alamagating dozens of fiefdoms at war with each other


Bit rich for a Burgher to look down on the Indians. As we all know the Burghers were licking the boots of the British.
 
.
And he blabbers all that cock in perfect Oxbridge accent as well.. The irony.. Bloody Hypocrite
What a dumb argument.
Here's he giving an interview in excellent Malayalam. Makes you happy?

 
.
What a dumb argument.
Here's he giving an interview in excellent Malayalam. Makes you happy?


Hes not bitching about the British is Malayali, But in English, And in high class Oxbridge one, Which would have been impossible for him if not for the Brits colonizing his backwaters and giving his sorry *** the opportunity of education

And you're even dumber not to realize that
 
.
Hes not bitching about the British is Malayali, But in English, And in high class Oxbridge one, Which would have been impossible for him if not for the Brits colonizing his backwaters and giving his sorry *** the opportunity of education

And you're even dumber not to realize that
Why would he have to b!tch about it if there was no colonisation!
Maybe he'd have become a mathematician instead, since the land was known for it until European arrival.

Point is, don't talk about things that didn't happen.
 
.
Why would he have to b!tch about it if there was no colonisation!
Maybe he'd have become a mathematician instead, since the land was known for it until European arrival.

Point is, don't talk about things that didn't happen.

Because bub, He's bitching in English the colonizers language to a global audience both he acquired from British colonization.. On top of he blabbers it in Oxford/Cambridge accent (Which now i assume you have no idea of given your repeated asinine comments) which his ancestors would never had dreamed of let alone attend if not for his part of the world not being colonized.. What an irony

Now if this was been said by Modi for an example it would carry more credit, given his background, Not from a British educated snotty brown sahib like Taroor who benefited by it than any other ordinary Indian.. Now that sunshine.. Is called hypocrisy

Look it up
 
.
Because bub, He's bitching in English the colonizers language to a global audience both he acquired from British colonization.. On top of he blabbers it in Oxford/Cambridge accent (Which now i assume you have no idea of given your repeated asinine comments) which his ancestors would never had dreamed of let alone attend if not for his part of the world not being colonized.. What an irony

Now if this was been said by Modi for an example it would carry more credit, given his background, Not from a British educated snotty brown sahib like Taroor who benefited by it than any other ordinary Indian.. Now that sunshine.. Is called hypocrisy

Look it up
You're assuming that speaking Oxford English is objectively an achievement, British Bub. It's not.

It may help in today's world, but that again is only because of colonial loot. His points are exactly against that, so arguing that "haha British gave him Oxford English" is utter stupidity.
He's arguing that the British shouldn't have.

Modi's background is RSS, which licked British boots and still uses the divisions British caused as fuel. They've no right to talk like Tharoor. So you're wrong there too.
See? You lose touch on reality when your thought process is narrow, which in this case is "Oxford English".
 
.
Back
Top Bottom