What's new

Sea Spark 2015 & It's important aspect

987240-image-1446929128-554-640x480.jpg
seaspark2.jpg
cms-image-000010584 (1).jpg
cms-image-000010585.jpg
images-cms-image-000010583.jpg
 

Attachments

  • cms-image-000010584.jpg
    cms-image-000010584.jpg
    224.5 KB · Views: 43
.
Wasting money on exercise with rusted naval ships better order bigger ships
Not wasting keeping mariners ready to fight with what they have.
NO we should not,, I don't think this will happen and neither should it.

You already have OHP class in your fleet .getting few more will bring same type of frigate in decent number.
 
. . . . .
Pakistan Navy successfully test-fires anti-ship guided missiles
Fayyaz Hussain November 14, 2015 9:59 pm ( 56 mins ago )
1447519686-9624-650x441.jpg

KARACHI (Web Desk) – Pakistan Navy successfully test-fired anti-ship guided missiles in North Arabian Sea on Saturday.

Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Muhammad Zakaullah along with senior naval officers witnessed the firings on board Pakistan Navy Ship Alamgir.

The missiles launched from surface and air units successfully engaged their intended targets with pinpoint accuracy.

The Navy chief appreciated the remarkable demonstration of professionalism during missile firing and expressed satisfaction over the combat readiness of the Navy.
Pakistan Navy successfully test-fires anti-ship guided missiles - Daily Pakistan Global
 
. .
in coming years , or more precisely ,post 2020 , PN must have 4 more F-22P with upgrades , 2-4 more Azmat Class FAC , and 2 Type 54(A) Destroyers from China ...

still not understand why we signed a contract of 8 Subs ... we can make it like 4 now and 4 later .. 7 Subs with AIP is enough to keep IN CBG's at bay .. we need more Frigates and Destroyers to give a proper cover to the Fighter who will launch a Counter attack on Enemy vassals ..

the idea of Turning Babur into a Anti-Ship missile and use it for Coast line defense System like Chinese Antiship Missile of C series ..
a AS missile of 800-1000 KM Range protecting the coast can be huge blow for enemy ..

Answer to the bold part.

Because as someone rightly said. In naval warfare you have two kind of ships, Submarines and targets.
 
.
Answer to the bold part.

we can sign contract of 4 subs .. and remaining money can be used for 2 type 54a and a sq of fighter for maritime strike role .. having money is one thing , but using it wisely is a complete different thing
 
.
we can sign contract of 4 subs .. and remaining money can be used for 2 type 54a and a sq of fighter for maritime strike role .. having money is one thing , but using it wisely is a complete different thing

8 subs is a must. That number shouldn't be decreased.
Yes there is an urgent need for more combat aircrafts and surface ships, but that shouldn't be achieved by sacrificing the number of subs.
 
.
8 subs is a must. That number shouldn't be decreased.
Yes there is an urgent need for more combat aircrafts and surface ships, but that shouldn't be achieved by sacrificing the number of subs.

and with 8 subs what you are going to do ? without having a proper surface fleet with Long range Sam's ??
Subs are deterrent for ships , but not against the Flankers , and don't forget our enemy has bought one of the best Anti-Sub Planes , P8i Poseidon .
 
. .
and with 8 subs what you are going to do ? without having a proper surface fleet with Long range Sam's ??
Subs are deterrent for ships , but not against the Flankers , and don't forget our enemy has bought one of the best Anti-Sub Planes , P8i Poseidon .
Obviously you can not counter air threats with subs. for flankers and P8 you need a potent airforce.
But that doesn't take away the need for advanced AIP equipped Submarines if you want to keep your sea lanes open.

what you just highlighted is coast origin threats. What subs give you is protection from Naval or shall I say sea-origin threats. You do realize how much superiority the enemy has in surface and sub-surface platforms
 
.
i was expecting

babur missile from F-22P ship

CM-400AKG from jf-17 thunder
 
.
Back
Top Bottom