Saudi Arabia Stymies U.S. Over Pakistan Terror List

[SALMAN F]

Or shall I say that illegal invasion after which they converted to Islam? Bottom line, Muslims should have left them alone so they can worship their idols and live as non believers???

Yes because you claim that your religion is peaceful and you don't force anyone to it but what you just said prove the opposite

 

[Imad.Khan]

None of the Yemenis are Saudis. We all know who they are fighting and who is supporting them. I can understand your long comment in favor of Iran to prove them "Not Guilty". Well, for your information Iranians were banned from Haj-e- Kabaah for a reason.

What do Yemenis have to do with any of what we have discussed? And my long comment was to show the correct information, I have no special love for Iran or anyone else, i just want to portray the correct information. And as for your last statement, Iranians being banned from Mecca/ Saudi, you will find that they have always been politically motivated.

Rest, I can't change your point of view. From where I view things, I know who is who and what is what.

As i said before i always try to research before i pass judgement and its not my viewpoint, its what had actually happened and its a Sunnah to verify any information before spreading it.

 

[Śakra]

Having a great laugh reading through the comments.

 

[Manidabest]

I'll give credit where credit is due, the Ummah actually worked like the Ummah for once.

Please my friend please stop being childish

 

[Saif-ud-Din Qutuz]

Yes because you claim that your religion is peaceful and you don't force anyone to it but what you just said prove the opposite

This is what the Iranians think and their sect followers. We didn't force anyone to embrace Islam. That's what your sect followers say about the companions of Prophet Muhammad P.B.U.H. I was being sarcastic in my previous comment which you couldn't understand at all.

What do Yemenis have to do with any of what we have discussed? And my long comment was to show the correct information, I have no special love for Iran or anyone else, i just want to portray the correct information. And as for your last statement, Iranians being banned from Mecca/ Saudi, you will find that they have always been politically motivated.

Well, your comment proves how shallow your vision is or shall I say intelligence. I just gave you an example to correlate but you simply couldn't. That proves the research you had carried out before commenting was extremely shallow.

Do you think the simple poet and human rights activist could have raised those 200-500 terrorists? Funded them? Provided them with weapon for the seige of Kaaba that lasted for 15 days? He all alone was that good and brilliant? No one was behind him? Forget about what your silly internet search tells you about his sect. Do you think without foreign funding it was possible for him? If you think so, then I'll rest my case. No need to argue with you because you're a total goner.

You couldn't understand why I brought up Yemen's issue. Again, let me ask you a simple question, is it possible for the so called Yemeni freedom fighters to resist Saudis when they've formed a collation force to fight them off? Having said that, you don't know what force is behind Yemeni freedom fighters? Who is funding them? Motivating them to revolt against Saudis? If you don't know, you're not worth my time. Someone who'll Google stuff pick random articles and consider them facts is not the one I'll engage in a debate. No offense meant, but I reckon I wasted my time with you. I hope there were people who read my comments and knew what I was talking about.

 

[Imad.Khan]

This is what the Iranians think and their sect followers. We didn't force anyone to embrace Islam. That's what your sect followers say about the companions of Prophet Muhammad P.B.U.H. I was being sarcastic in my previous comment which you couldn't understand at all.


Well, your comment proves how shallow your vision is or shall I say intelligence. I just gave you an example to correlate but you simply couldn't. That proves the research you had carried out before commenting was extremely shallow.

Do you think the simple poet and human rights activist could have raised those 200-500 terrorists? Funded them? Provided them with weapon for the seige of Kaaba that lasted for 15 days? He all alone was that good and brilliant? No one was behind him? Forget about what your silly internet search tells you about his sect. Do you think without foreign funding it was possible for him? If you think so, then I'll rest my case. No need to argue with you because you're a total goner.

You couldn't understand why I brought up Yemen's issue. Again, let me ask you a simple question, is it possible for the so called Yemeni freedom fighters to resist Saudis when they've formed a collation force to fight them off? Having said that, you don't know what force is behind Yemeni freedom fighters? Who is funding them? Motivating them to revolt against Saudis? If you don't know, you're not worth my time. Someone who'll Google stuff pick random articles and consider them facts is not the one I'll engage in a debate. No offense meant, but I reckon I wasted my time with you. I hope there were people who read my comments and knew what I was talking about.

So i am a goner just because i tried to confirm what is said, while you are unable to substantiate a single piece of your claim, actually i consider your comments as spreading of false information.

You didnt even bother to read the references i shared, if you had you would have got the answer to the questions you posted.

Finally as for Yemen, how the hell does providing support for Yemenis now confirms Iranian involvement in the siege of Kaaba back in the 70s. Seriously your logic is so twisted and you call my intelligence shallow, just because i wont swallow all the BS coming from you.

 

[waz]

Yep this thread turned out to be the complete opposite. The Saudi led GCC team dropped their support for Pakistan and now it has turned into a sectarian slug fest. Thread closed.