What's new

Satellite Imagery of SU-30s and SAMs Deployed In Srinagar and front line bases.

if war breaks, Pakistan must destroy whole Srinagar Base through Army Strategic command actions. (cruise missiles or short range ballistic missiles)

Result:
* A huge loss of Enemy Su-30's
* Push back of enemy from Srinagar region.
* Loss of Enemy Air defense and newly equipped R-77-1 missiles
* Pakistan will be all Ready and ckear to attack Srinagar.
Why should we waste our precious limited cruise missiles inventory so early in a possibly long drawn war on tactical and replaceable targets?
 
Last edited:
MAR-1 is anti radiation missile used on JF-17 against any ground unit.
it's radar cant be jammed by enemy any how. and we have nearly hundred of them
 
Before you guys rip me a new one for being an Indian, hear me out, many jingoistic posters here propose radical solutions without any thought about the real life consequences, I understand venting here online can be a healthy outlet, however toxic it can be but why do you underestimate your opponent to such an extent as to consider him to be a pushover ?

Please understand, after any major military action there will be a counter, case in point would be 26-27th Feb. This is a 70+ year perverse game of tit for tat, I'm under no illusion that there won't be a reaction from GoP, not these hare brained schemes though, but a well thought out response.
Because of thousand years of history? "why do you underestimate your opponent to such an extent as to consider him to be a pushover ?"
 
Why should we waste our precious limited cruise missiles inventory so early in a possible long drawn war on tactical and replaceable targets?

cruise missile costs less than one jf-17 and is more destructive, than taking risk of whole jf-17 squadron fighting in air against many enemy long bvr capable su 30s
 
cruise missile costs less than one jf-17 and is more destructive, than taking risk of whole jf-17 squadron fighting in air against many enemy long bvr capable su 30s
Why should we risk a jft for such mission.
 
range of sd-10 is 80-100km
while r-77-1 is upto 120km
 
Because of thousand years of history? "why do you underestimate your opponent to such an extent as to consider him to be a pushover ?"
I have no doubt we have a rich shared history on this continent, but surely you must consider, in the face of ever changing scenarios and fast shifting world, historical events the further they are, the less they matter (practically)on present events.
 
better to take out the plant from roots at once than to start cutting it from top

on paper yes in practice non of su30s could track either f 16 or jft from even 80 kms

Because of clouds :(
 
nice

What about sending small china toy drones and waste their sam batteries,
like the idiots did to destroy our 7000rs drone with spyder missile in feburary
Those are all futuristic concepts used in Syria against Russians with very little to no success.
 
This could be a better option (toy f-16 with horrible speed) about 70$ or more only

 
Back
Top Bottom