jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction score
- 387
- Country
- Location
Dude, even a Vietnam era 155 shell Nuclear Artillery have effect a lot more than 3 to 5 sq meters (that's smaller than a house) effect. The smallest Nuclear Artillery shell Russia have (or had) is 3BV3 which uses 152mm warhead, that artillery shell is 1kt, it would have 500 meters ionised radiation of 1000 Rad (Typical Fatal Dosage), and that's the smallest nuclear artillery shell they had. The other are 3BV1, 3BV2 and 3BV4, which based on 204 and 300mm shell.Perhaps u are not aware of the fall out of nuclear attack. U perhaps think a nuke attack is a destruction of a country , a tactical nuke may have an impact on around d 3-5 sq meter not more than that .
Russia don't have Nuclear Artillery Shell (At least they claim), all they have for tactical usage are either kiloton munition (eg Dirty Bomb) or missile up to 10 kilotons
Sub Kiloton munition did exist (at least with US) but those aren't for Tactical Purpose, it's more like Surgical Assassination type Direct Action Mission (Like Airdrop JDAM or Drone Strike) but those weapons still would have greater effect range than 3 to 5 sq. meters. It would have been able to take out an entire block (so at least 100 sq. meters) Even if such weapon with 3 to 5 sq meters range exist, you would have been better off stick with Thermobaric Weapon or even dumb bomb have more AOE than that.
Talk about not aware of the fallout......
Last edited: