What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

. .
MeFishToo said:
Its an example of Russia flairing extreme amounts of gas, most probably because of operational issues. I know the LNG plant isnt completed. I was just pointing out where the flairing has been taking place for months.
You may know in theory how Russia should operate its gas fields and pipelines (eventhough you behave like a trainee). Maybe you should offer your expertise to the russians, it seems theyve been missing something. I have a feeling this is somehow a result of the sanctions and western oil and service companies leaving Russia.
Click to expand...

here is an explanation to those interested as to why operators don't simply stop producing oil/gas when they deplete storage and can't sell the oil/gas in reserves quickly enough to make room for oil/gas being extracted from production wells.
There is no doubt that the Russians can't find alternate buyers for the gas they once piped to Europe via Nordstream. The Chinese pipelines can't cope with the volumes and the Russians don't have enough LNG terminals or LNG carriers to ship the gas to interested parties.

I think it's time to put the silly uninformed notions of Mr Han to bed.

The temporary shutting in of wells is the one thing that oil companies are trying to avoid at all costs. That’s because restarting production is expensive and wells are not guaranteed to return to their flow rate. The doubts are so great that some experts wonder whether the current round of shut downs, far from preserving the resource, won’t accelerate oil depletion instead. Some Russian engineers are even considering burning excess oil, rather than downsizing production.

www.resilience.org

Shutting Down Oil Wells, a Risky and Expensive Option

The temporary shutting in of wells is the one thing that oil companies are trying to avoid at all costs. That's because restarting production is expensive
www.resilience.org www.resilience.org
 
. . . . . . . .
Ahmadbhutta01 said:
The way things are going it looks like Ukraine will end up getting nuked eventually, and the zio-jew pm and president of Ukraine will escape to Israel saying THATS ALL FOLKS
Click to expand...
It would be stupid for Russia to nuke Ukraine.

Ukraine is big, but they aren't that big, it's 500miles across, with Moscow around 300 miles from Kharkiv. Where are you going to nuke if you don't want radioactive material to blow back at you?

Nuking West Ukraine, you are going to have Fallout shroud over Poland, would NATO be okay with that? Nuking Northern Ukraine it will blow toward Belarus, nuke Eastern Ukraine the fallout will blow back toward Russia.

Ask yourself this question, would NATO or Russia themselves okay with Fallout going over their territories? It doesn't matter if that is a 500kt device or 5kt tactical nuke, it still gets fallout in the end and you can't control where the wind blow.
 
. .
jhungary said:
It would be stupid for Russia to nuke Ukraine.

Ukraine is big, but they aren't that big, it's 500miles across, with Moscow around 300 miles from Kharkiv. Where are you going to nuke if you don't want radioactive material to blow back at you?

Nuking West Ukraine, you are going to have Fallout shroud over Poland, would NATO be okay with that? Nuking Northern Ukraine it will blow toward Belarus, nuke Eastern Ukraine the fallout will blow back toward Russia.

Ask yourself this question, would NATO or Russia themselves okay with Fallout going over their territories? It doesn't matter if that is a 500kt device or 5kt tactical nuke, it still gets fallout in the end and you can't control where the wind blow.
Click to expand...
Perhaps u are not aware of the fall out of nuclear attack. U perhaps think a nuke attack is a destruction of a country , a tactical nuke may have an impact on around d 3-5 sq meter not more than that .
 
.
Viet said:
You are dumb because you blindly believe russian propaganda shit. North stream 1 has gas injection station, exactly the location where the flame burning. No, Lng is economically more expensive than gas pipeline. You said you work in oil and gas industry?
No, there is no reasonable ground why Gazprom reduces gas flow by 80 pct while burning it.

www.tagesschau.de

Weltwirtschaft - aktuelle Nachrichten

Überblick zu Hintergründen, Analysen und Interviews bei tagesschau.de - die erste Adresse für Nachrichten und umfassende Berichte zu aktuellen Themen.
www.tagesschau.de www.tagesschau.de
Click to expand...
You accused me of believing in Russian propaganda, but have you ever thought that maybe you were fed half truths by the msm to justify the war! Come on both Russia and the West are guilty of bullshit propaganda. Remember the Ghost of Kiev? Lololol. The key is use some critical thinking to know the truth and truth is normally half way in between.

Let us dissect your argument, firstly do we know how long it has been flaming, what was being flamed? Was it offspec gas? FFS, we need specialised metering skids and gas spectrometers to know the quality of the gas and the amount of gas. But msm can just guesstimate by looking at the flame from space?

That's what I had been telling you, NOBODY SELLS LNG IN A PIPELINE BECAUSE ITS EXPENSIVE. You need to insulate the pipes and use very expensive alloy for the pipes. Therefore what has a LNG plant flaring got to do with pipeline supply to Germany?

For the nth fcking time, you just fcking close a few valves, you don't have to burn it if you don't want to sell it. Can you understand simple science? You are not selling tacos here. Tacos can go bad if you don't sell it. Gas doesn't go bad, you fcking close the valves and tahts it.
 
.
MeFishToo said:
Its an example of Russia flairing extreme amounts of gas, most probably because of operational issues. I know the LNG plant isnt completed. I was just pointing out where the flairing has been taking place for months.
You may know in theory how Russia should operate its gas fields and pipelines (eventhough you behave like a trainee). Maybe you should offer your expertise to the russians, it seems theyve been missing something. I have a feeling this is somehow a result of the sanctions and western oil and service companies leaving Russia.
Click to expand...
How extreme? Do you have a flowmeter to measure the flow? Do you know what was flared? Do you have a mass spectrometer to know the quality of the gas? Was it offspec gas? Toxic gas? Residual gas? If someone can just look from space and know what was flared and how much was flared, then alot of instrument companies would be out of business. Then I wouldn't ned to buy multimillion dollar metering skids right?

Months? Was it intermittent flaring? Just because a journalist with no technical background claims something, you need to check the claims. In the old days rigs used to flare everyday, but for only 30 mins. And they flare mostly offspec gas which is basically low quality gas mixed with toxic gases which they can't sell.

I have been trying very had to explain to idiots here, LNG is not delivered using pipeline, its delivered using LNG carriers and normally is located at the coast, the carriers bring them to market no matter how far because of economics of scale, it is profitable. Then the gas is regasifeid at the client plant. Get it. That LNG plant has NOTHING TO DO WITH PIPELINE SUPPLY TO EUROPE. Its not easy commissioning a plant and flaring is normal. Experts flare less, amateurs more. Lolol
 
.

Similar threads

H
Rassian Foreign Affairs
2 3 4
Replies
46
Views
2K
sidkhan2
S
fitpOsitive
Attentions desis of Britain
Replies
0
Views
317
fitpOsitive
fitpOsitive
beijingwalker
Zelensky on Ukraine aid: 'This month is the difficulties'
Replies
1
Views
574
aziqbal
aziqbal
S
General News And Discussions About Russia
2 3
Replies
31
Views
2K
HaiderAfan
H
beijingwalker
EU asks China to influence Russia to return to Grain Deal
Replies
0
Views
545
beijingwalker
beijingwalker

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom