What's new

Rohit sharma is now the top scorer In ODIs passes 220

i am criticizing the pitches dear for both teams ... they make only batting friendly pitches suitable for spinners only.. its missing that aggressive factor of bowling.. same thing is going on in UAE Every Pakistani player is making 100 in every inning... its quite boring actually if u ask me.. but if u like such high scoring games on batting friendly pitches ..its your taste.. no one is taking any credit from u or rohit sharma .. just my opinion..

Dude. Tough i agree with ur point in general. But i am sure u havent watched da match. Shoaib Akhtar himself said in commentary that its a dream pitch for him coz of the carry n bounce. Even 400 odd score happen in Aus NZ n SA. Does it mean they wr substandard pitches? Lame Argument.
 
1 is ok....2,3,4...WEIRD ??
a) made in india 200>>
b) Batting pitches
c) Graveyard for bowlers
d) small boundry....

ICC....tu sharam nai karay ga.......khod tu SHARAM kro.....Dunya kia kahay giii....Natak lagaya hoa hy

What really tells the flatness of a wicket? A team score or an individual score? India doesn't feature in the top 4 of the highest ODI team scores and in none of those matches, a player was able to score a double century.

Why so? Were those pitches any less flatter?
 
200 is for the INDIA by the INDIA in the INDIA :p:



What really tells the flatness of a wicket? A team score or an individual score? India doesn't feature in the top 4 of the highest ODI team scores and in none of those matches, a player was able to score a double century.
Why so? Were those pitches any less flatter?
What u wanna say....??:undecided:
 
How many teams has done it...stop comparing one such match with another. No wonder tis not the same Sri Lankan team....is it.

Well, it is not same Indian team either. 4 old and 6 new players this time.
 
200 is for the INDIA by the INDIA in the INDIA :p:




What u wanna say....??:undecided:

There were 6 previous occasions when a team other than India had score more than 400 runs. SO, My question is why wasn;t even a single double century scored in one of those matches?

The reason no other country's batsman was able to score a 200 is their inability and not that they were not playing on FLAT Indian pitches
 
There were 6 previous occasions when a team other than India had score more than 400 runs. SO, My question is why wasn;t even a single double century scored in one of those matches?
One time i know SL crossed 400 mark against KENYA
.
Other i know Australia vs SouthAfrica when SA successfuly chased score
.
I've no info about other matches played by which strong side against whom? .........But thats not my point.....my point is why... Once in Blue Moon activity used to appear from no-where...only 4 INDIA by the ...In the...:big_boss:
 
Dude. Tough i agree with ur point in general. But i am sure u havent watched da match. Shoaib Akhtar himself said in commentary that its a dream pitch for him coz of the carry n bounce. Even 400 odd score happen in Aus NZ n SA. Does it mean they wr substandard pitches? Lame Argument.

its not about 400 dear .. its about batsman scoring in subcontinent matches.. thats lame
 
Insane score. Centuries are becoming meaningless, but I don't mean to take anything away from this man. That is an amazing score, one he'll remember for the rest of his life.
 
Isn't this the same ground where Pakistan bowled India out for 165?
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom