Rohit sharma is now the top scorer In ODIs passes 220

[Parul]

264 is a good ODI score. Rohit Sharna, let me make the good score.

 

[BDforever]

yeahhh... I think chittagong is also.

u can kill yourself lol

 

[nik141991]

@BDforever srilanka didn't even reach rohit score so much for flat track bullies

 

[BDforever]

@BDforever srilanka didn't even reach rohit score so much for flat track bullies

yes...
Sri lanka lost to 1 innings by 13 runs lol

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

How is he gonna find that.... It used to be one of the fastest pitches in subcontinent.........

Maybe the news about domestic tournament and pitches he might follow
In India, Chepauk used to have a sporting wicket, not now anymore.. Now Ahmedabad, Jaipur and Dharamshala are the ideal pacy grounds in India..

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

and india's great bating line up collapsed

That match was one superb thriller

 

[Winchester]

I don't see him scoring 264 in the whole test series in Australia !

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

Really though a brilliant effort, I feel this kind of cricket is not kinda watchable really. 264. Whose mistake is it? We had all Sachin, Richards, Gilly, Saeed Anwar in their prime. None was able to touch 200, and Sachin was able to achieve it only in twilight of his glorious career.
In Richards era, there was no field restriction, no powerplay, and yet he was destructive batsmen, but cricket was watchable.. But now its just swashbuckling, shorter boundaries etc Bowlers are yet to adapt, is what I feel. Bowlers should rediscover Bodyline bowling, bowl to neck height.. Its time the game is made even,

 

[A.M.]

Rohits ODI average at home is double compared to away games. Lol what a joke BCCI has become.

 

[trident2010]

Lolzz to the comments !!

 

[B+ Dracula]

Really though a brilliant effort, I feel this kind of cricket is not kinda watchable really. 264. Whose mistake is it? We had all Sachin, Richards, Gilly, Saeed Anwar in their prime. None was able to touch 200,
and Sachin was able to achieve it only in twilight of his glorious career.

Sachin ,Saeed....made them in INDIAN pitches
Kallis 188 vs UAE
....I've no idea about others ....how they crossed 170 Plus.....a) against whom b) indian grounds or else

But i request Indian Officials esp BCCI and ICC....plz dont make that figure appear as Joke
what happens to india all of sudden they're making myriads of records......which was not possible in 70's to 2000 by having great stars like Sunil Gavaskar...or else??

In Richards era, there was no field restriction, no powerplay, and yet he was destructive batsmen, but cricket was watchable.. But now its just swashbuckling, shorter boundaries etc Bowlers are yet to adapt, is what I feel. Bowlers should rediscover Bodyline bowling, bowl to neck height.. Its time the game is made even,

ICC gone mad in the heat of commercialism ....why they're confusing Cricket with Baseball??
Beauty of Cricket is giving equal chance to both bowlers & batsman so that viewers enjoy BREAK EVEN strength of both sides

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

Sachin ,Saeed....made them in INDIAN pitches
Kallis 188 vs UAE
....I've no idea about others ....how they crossed 170 Plus.....a) against whom b) indian grounds or else

But i request Indian Officials esp BCCI and ICC....plz dont make that figure appear as Joke
what happens to india all of sudden they're making myriads of records......which was not possible in 70's to 2000 by having great stars like Sunil Gavaskar...or else??


ICC gone mad in the heat of commercialism ....why they're confusing Cricket with Baseball??
Beauty of Cricket is giving equal chance to both bowlers & batsman so that viewers enjoy BREAK EVEN game

Sunil Gavaskar was never a great ODI player.. And before 1992, there was no 15over restriction, no field restrictions etc so it was tough for the batsmen to beat...
And even the innings of Saaed Anwar in Chennai was not a flat track.. Neither was other pitches in India.. It was sportive pittches, supporting pace and also spin..
But now, captains of sub continent teams demand, spinning tracks, to beat opponents. Aussies demand seaming track to defeat other teams.. One thing that can be done to improve game standard is removing field restrictions, and by that way, we can again see the joy of building partnerships with singles , doubles and later 4's and 6's. The art of building innings is lost.

 

[B+ Dracula]

Sunil Gavaskar was never a great ODI player.. And before 1992, there was no 15over restriction, no field restrictions etc so it was tough for the batsmen to beat...
And even the innings of Saaed Anwar in Chennai was not a flat track.. Neither was other pitches in India.. It was sportive pittches, supporting pace and also spin..
But now, captains of sub continent teams demand, spinning tracks, to beat opponents. Aussies demand seaming track to defeat other teams.. One thing that can be done to improve game standard is removing field restrictions, and by that way, we can again see the joy of building partnerships with singles , doubles and later 4's and 6's. The art of building innings is lost.

Nice Analysis.....I support what u said above.....esp about Art of building innings by singles

 

[jugad]

Truth be told luck was very much in his favour today. Gotta remain consistent if he has real talent

 

[khujliwal]

One bouncer rule should go out, bring in body line.