Report - Modi government quietly working to revoke the indus water treaty with pakistan

[The Accountant]

India destroyed an entire site in Pakistan killing about 200 people. What more retaliation do you want?

Secondly, the choice of choosing Indians as workers is political. Now, people have to work but that is because otherwise people will become complacent and get out of control. Most Indians do simple menial jobs which can be easily replaced by Pakistanis, Bangladeshis and other ME countries like Middle east.

Investment is also not for profit. India has received about 1 trillion dollar worth of investment and keeps getting $60 billion of investment every year. There is no sign of any money being taken away from India. So, money is flowing one sided to India without any outflow. So, this investment is political funding rather than real investment.


India has openly snubbed democrats and hence the backlash. But USA government is not doing anything against India. World needs India, not other way around. Only China & Russia is the country which really has some clout on its own on India. The west have very limited clout on Indian affairs as they offer nothing. USA just prints dollar on behalf of Arabs due to petrodollar but does not give any resource or technology of its own. EU also has no real transaction with India in terms of technology or resource. Refugee crisis will first destroy middle east and that means entire world oil supply will be cut. So, the world will try their best to appease India to avoid India from lashing out.


How will 150 nukes destroy India? Do you know that about half of India is agriculture land? How will you destroy such a large area with nukes? Urban centres are by itself not critical. Only the critical infrastructure of high end technology is critical. These will anyways be well sheltered. 150 nukes of 1MT is needed to destroy only the region of NCR (Delhi + Gurgaon + Ghaziabad). It can hardly destroy entire country. You are simply feeling insecure and hence over exaggerating the power of nukes. If nukes are so powerful that no other weapons are needed, why are countries developing 5th generation planes, stealth ships, submarines etc? Anyways, all can be simply vapourised by nukes which even less advanced countries like North Korea has. Why bother wasting time and resource for developing the new weapons?


Nukes or no nukes, war will go for years. Things don't end in one instant. It is not that a small country can destroy a country which is 10 times larger just by using nukes. Nukes don't do magic.


How will you vapourise the factories? Why don't you expect these factories to be well sheltered and covered with bunker quality roofing to avoid damage? Why do you expect these important factories to have aluminium sheet roof.

Either u have no idea what r u talking about or u r taking some special quality weed man probably some really hard stuff.

 

[Chhatrapati]

Man ... hiw a 50 50 claim can be given when more than 80% of the river path is covered in Pakistan ?

We are already giving 80% of the water that's flowing in India to Pakistan. I said, make it 50% I'm not talking about water from other tributaries of Pakistan that originate somewhere else.

 

[The Accountant]

We are already giving 80% of the water that's flowing in India to Pakistan. I said, make it 50% I'm not talking about water from other tributaries of Pakistan that originate somewhere else.

On which basis? if some water follows through 10% of your territory 90% of our territory it means that you are diverting water of 40% of the people to those who do not have any right to that water.

The actual right of people to the water are those living on adjacent areas of the river. what right does Indian Punjab has over water flowing through Kashmir?

 

[Chhatrapati]

On which basis? if some water follows through 10% of your territory 90% of our territory it means that you are diverting water of 40% of the people to those who do not have any right to that water.

The actual right of people to the water are those living on adjacent areas of the river. what right does Indian Punjab has over water flowing through Kashmir?

Is this that hard to comprehend?

I'll make it simple, say there is 100 MAF water flowing from India to Pakistan, international law mandates 50MAF water to be given to Pakistan, the rest 50 MAF we can use it for generating electricity or agriculture or divert to other places.

As per IWT, Pakistan gets 80 MAF of water flowing from India, we get to use the 20 MAF for our purposes.
What is with Indian Punjab and Kashmir?

 

[Fox_hound]

Why don't you just skip the middlemen? Just vanish; nobody will miss you.

You guys would, don't lie. You dont skip a day without thinking about us. You wouldn't be here in the first place otherwise

 

[War Historian]

Yes these servants slap to your "abhi non done"....have you counted those slaps. remember those villagers

mann really??
you don't know the difference between a war and a small scale airspace skirmish , don't you??


Atleast when you talk about the war have your senses on place , not utter the words that you wish to happen,
that's insanity of you guys I see here , you guys want your wishes fullifed to lower the burden of the wars you have lost to INDIA .
but that ain't going to happen by claiming to win a small airspace skirmish and chest thumping about the incident.
By the way tea was FANTASTIC my servants.LOL

 

[The Accountant]

Is this that hard to comprehend?

I'll make it simple, say there is 100 MAF water flowing from India to Pakistan, international law mandates 50MAF water to be given to Pakistan, the rest 50 MAF we can use it for generating electricity or agriculture or divert to other places.

As per IWT, Pakistan gets 80 MAF of water flowing from India, we get to use the 20 MAF for our purposes.
What is with Indian Punjab and Kashmir?

Thats for 3 rivers only. the other rivers you are getting 100%.

secondly which law gives 50% right to divert?

 

[Chhatrapati]

Thats for 3 rivers only. the other rivers you are getting 100%.

secondly which law gives 50% right to divert?

Again, do you even read what I write or just want to keep repeating nonsense? Read Indus water treaty and see how much water Pakistan gets. Instead of asking questions which I have already explained.

 

[The Accountant]

Again, do you even read what I write or just want to keep repeating nonsense? Read Indus water treaty and see how much water Pakistan gets. Instead of asking questions which I have already explained.

Can u give me the international law reference where river is divided between countries on 50% basis

 

[That Guy]

Is this that hard to comprehend?

I'll make it simple, say there is 100 MAF water flowing from India to Pakistan, international law mandates 50MAF water to be given to Pakistan, the rest 50 MAF we can use it for generating electricity or agriculture or divert to other places.

As per IWT, Pakistan gets 80 MAF of water flowing from India, we get to use the 20 MAF for our purposes.
What is with Indian Punjab and Kashmir?

The IWT was crafted specifically because there was a need for Pakistan to have it's own exclusive Riviera, so that it could survive.

International laws are there as a general guide line, bilateral treaties supersede them, so long as both nations are consenting parties.

I said it before, and I'll leave it at this, Pakistan cannot survive long term on just 50%. You trying to argue otherwise is pointless. Pakistan will go to war, before it gives up its share under the iwt.

 

[Smarana Mitra]

The truly horrifying bit is that most of the population on both sides is oblivious to the reality what “wiping out” means.

Syria is a prime example of what just conventional weapons did to a well established(of sorts) nation. One can only shudder at what delusions are held by the bhakts and their counterparts here on the idea of “survival” or “martyrdom”.

Death will be a blessing to what will remain of the subcontinent once the first fission takes place. Anyone expecting that they will survive as a nation state are in a fools paradise.

Wars are not fought for the first time. Wars have been fought before too and will be fought in the futures endlessly. Any large scale destruction requires long time sustained attack. Short bursts of bombs will not do much at all. What is needed to win war is the ability to fight for long time - years and even decades if needed. This means infrastructure to produce equipment and arms are needed to have indigenously.

USSR lost 3 crore of its 17 crore population in WW2 and still emerged out stronger and as a world power. Anyone who thinks that a few nuclear bombs can destroy everything simply is unable to understand human psychology and the ability of humans to adapt during difficult circumstances. Humans have war ingrained in DNA as every human alive has had ancestors who have fought wars for millennia. Humans psychology drastically changes during wars and becomes far more resilient.

 

[Joe Shearer]

You guys would, don't lie. You dont skip a day without thinking about us. You wouldn't be here in the first place otherwise

<sigh> Check my posts, and their diminished frequency, if you really like the pleasure of driving a knitting needle slowly into your eyes.