Sugarcane
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2011
- Messages
- 21,105
- Reaction score
- 29
- Country
- Location
I am non-resident
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have the same read on the Army's caliber preference, but I assume there are certain other limitations to the G-3 that spark off these frequent discussions on changing the PA's standard assault rifle. I am trying to understand what exactly these limitations are, both currently and with an eye on longer term infantry related changes, and whether any of the currently available solutions offer significant improvements on those limitations.Above all, Army would like to stick to 7.62mm rounds
I have the same read on the Army's caliber preference, but I assume there are certain other limitations to the G-3 that spark off these frequent discussions on changing the PA's standard assault rifle. I am trying to understand what exactly these limitations are, both currently and with an eye on longer term infantry related changes, and whether any of the currently available solutions offer significant improvements on those limitations.
That is sort of what I was getting at - some of the limitations could be addressed by POF developed/adopted variants of the G-3. Plastic/composite furniture for reduced weight and Day/night scopes could be made standard across the infantry perhaps.Its heavier, ill-suited for CQBs and packs a mean recoil, than its contemporaries !
But its still fairly accurate, the recoil issue has been addressed by firing it at semi-auto instead of full burst and some of its sleeker versions with hand grips etc. have been come up with.
What kinds of parameters? I assume we could break them down into two broad sets - technical and (for lack of a better word) ergonomic perhaps?Though its still a '50s designs and you can only do so much with it before you're gonna have to replace it with something better if you want to improve in different parameters that standard rifles are gauged against.
I have the same read on the Army's caliber preference, but I assume there are certain other limitations to the G-3 that spark off these frequent discussions on changing the PA's standard assault rifle. I am trying to understand what exactly these limitations are, both currently and with an eye on longer term infantry related changes, and whether any of the currently available solutions offer significant improvements on those limitations.
MPT-76 is a derivative of H&K-417. Unlike T-129, no third party issues this time.
MPT-76 is a derivative of H&K-417. Unlike T-129, no third party issues this time.
It is ugly isn't it.What is the sight attached to the picatinny rail?
It is ugly isn't it.
AK-47 is the meanest looking of them all. Its beautiful.Don't care about ugly, AK47 is ugly yet most reliable. Just want details about it any member know?
I prefer SCAR-H and can't say for sure although they have done massive changes to G3 but our General can all of a Sudden change there mindPakistan should go for either SCAR-H or HK-417. Right now, i don't think that there is any plan to replace those battle rifles. However when we do, we need to get the best on the market because we will use them for next 40 odd years.
MPT-76 is a derivative of H&K-417. Unlike T-129, no third party issues this time.