Ready to kill, get killed to save cows: Sakshi Maharaj

[T-Rex]

New Delhi: Adding more fuel to the political slugfest over Dadri lynching, BJP MP Sakshi Maharaj has said that he is willing to kill and get killed to save cows.
“We won't tolerate insult to our mother...will die, will kill,” he said, adding that the politics going on over the issue is condemnable.

Also Read: Dadri like incidents hurt country's image - Arun Jaitley

Slamming the Uttar Pradesh government's handling of the situation, Maharaj said double standards are being employed by the Samajwadi Party.

“I don't have any issue with Akhilesh Yadav announcing Rs 45 lakh compensation for Akhlaq's family. When two girls were raped and murdered in Unnao, he gave no compensation to the family," he said.

Also Read: No mention of beef/cow slaughter in UP govt's report to MHA?

The Unnao MP also hit out Samajwadi Party leader Azam Khan. "Azam Khan is a Pakistani. He has faith in Pakistan's political force," Maharaj said.
Ready to kill, get killed to save cows: Sakshi Maharaj | Zee News

Now, that's how a true hindu terrorist talks!

 

[haviZsultan]

Some kill over a cartoon, some are killing over f@@@@@ cows.

Tells us what idiots are living in the world today. We kill for perceived blasphemy, them for cow slaughter. People who want to impose idiotic views on others are not few in this world.

The first blow to the theory was when the second nation two-nation-theoried itself, just 25 years after formation.

Bengal loss was a blow to the muslim character of Pakistan and proved one thing. That ethnicity and culture should be equally allowed to flourish. Our politicians did not see the logic of treating all equally. It was the biggest blow to Islam and the muslim world. Most of my Indianized muslim relatives argue that Bengal division was the breaking point of muslim loyalty from Pakistan to India. Otherwise most muslims before 1971 continued to support Pakistan. Don't deny it. I have many relatives in Lucknow and other parts.

Nations cannot be wished into existence, nor can a shared religion (with nothing else shared) forge people into a nation. India was a nation with an identity, long before it became a republic. Our neighbours are still trying to justify being a nation, that too, ironically, by watching the domestic news of their neighbour and picking up any triviality.

This is incorrect.

Notice another fact - most Indians condems such idiotic statements long before Paksitanis pick them up to justify their own existence. But imagine somebody in Pakistan saying that he is ready to kill and be killed in the name of religion, or for the honour of whatever is sacred to him. Such a person would immediately become a hero for them.

This is utterly incorrect. Look at the policy and you will know. Pakistan goes after right wing terrorists with a vengeance and is fighting a war on terror that resulted in 50000+ dead. Has India ever waged war on Hindu extremists? So how can you make such a claim. This is the problem with some muslims left there. Too brainwashed to look at the only state that can come to your rescue positively.

Wait, so you are deriving authority by quoting the words of an executed terrorist?

If people like Yakub Memon, who killed 256 people with bombs, is whom you look up to to validate yourself, you should pause for a moment and reflect.

I am a student of the war on terror and this is where not only you but many of us appear to be wrong. Yakub Memon could possibly be innocent. I have learned that both Faisal Shahzad and Tunda were innocent, not terrorists. At least thats what my research leads me to.

Regardless if you see them as terrorists too then why is their a different law for a hindu and muslim? For example Afzal Guru laid down arms and was killed yet Modi or Tytler responsible for thousands of muslim deaths are free. Isn't it hypocricy?

I think muslims left there need to think about things. Not just blame Pakistanis for caring about muslims left there. They saved our lives-the Pakistanis and I proudly call myself one.

 

[Xenophon]

Are they even start worshipping cow's dung ?

 

[Maarkhoor]

Are they even start worshipping cow's dung ?

a single one liner question of this kind considered trolling.

 

[The Vicious Kind]

Why are these nut jobs are targeting muslims ? Why don't they protest over the fact that India is the largest exporter of beef and out of 6 largest meat suppliers , 4 are run by Hindus .
India on top in exporting beef - The Hindu

The answer lies in the fact that this is just a ploy to marginalize the Muslim community in the name of curbing the sacred beef slaughtering. The truth is that RSS indoctrination has fogged their brains. Bharatiya janta party has lately morphed into "Hindu Janta party ".

 

[Imran Khan]

this gao mata madness is radiclus now a days

 

[Path-Finder]

Foot and mouth disease has transferred to humans as well!

 

[The_Showstopper]

 

[Skull and Bones]

Another maha chutiya.

 

[ayesha.a]

This is utterly incorrect. Look at the policy and you will know. Pakistan goes after right wing terrorists with a vengeance and is fighting a war on terror that resulted in 50000+ dead. Has India ever waged war on Hindu extremists? So how can you make such a claim. This is the problem with some muslims left there. Too brainwashed to look at the only state that can come to your rescue positively.

I was talking about Pakistani society in general - people who have killed for religious reasons have become heroes - the murderer of governor Taseer, for instance. Even lawyers and judges were seen garlanding him.

Bengal loss was a blow to the muslim character of Pakistan and proved one thing. That ethnicity and culture should be equally allowed to flourish. Our politicians did not see the logic of treating all equally. It was the biggest blow to Islam and the muslim world. Most of my Indianized muslim relatives argue that Bengal division was the breaking point of muslim loyalty from Pakistan to India. Otherwise most muslims before 1971 continued to support Pakistan. Don't deny it. I have many relatives in Lucknow and other parts.

Chances are that I have a lot more relatives in India, if that's a yardstick for truth claims. "Most muslims" before 1971 supporting Pakistan is a very fragile claim. Substantiate that, instead of asking me to deny it.

Pakistanis simply could not accept the fact that an equal, if not larger, number of muslims could and did live in India amongst hindus and sikhs and others. It strikes at the very reason for the existence of Pakistan, which is why it is difficult for Pakistanis to accept that.

There are communal troubles in India, no doubt. But by and large, the muslims of India lead similar lives as hindus and others.

 

[war&peace]

Someone must tell this basturd that I eat his mother every day. If he has the courage, come here to Atlanta, I will hunt him with an arrow and make his seekh kabab for my dogs.

 

[ayesha.a]

I am a student of the war on terror and this is where not only you but many of us appear to be wrong. Yakub Memon could possibly be innocent. I have learned that both Faisal Shahzad and Tunda were innocent, not terrorists. At least thats what my research leads me to.

Regardless if you see them as terrorists too then why is their a different law for a hindu and muslim? For example Afzal Guru laid down arms and was killed yet Modi or Tytler responsible for thousands of muslim deaths are free. Isn't it hypocricy?

The crucial difference is that Modi was not convicted by any court. All the courts cleared him of all charges, due to lack of evidence. (As always, it doesn't necessarily mean he is innocent, just that there is no evidence to prove his guilt. That presumption of innocence until proven guilty is true in all common law societies.)

I'm no fan of Modi; but there is no different law for hindus and muslims, at least not criminal laws. If he was declared guilty by the courts, and still was allowed to walk free, that would be a travesty of justice. But the fact is that all the resources of the govt, when the opposition party was ruling the center, could not prove his guilt.

By the way, there are plenty of muslims who have waged war against India in the past, but laid down arms, and walked free. Yaseen Malik, for instance.

There is no systematic bias against muslims enshrined in Indian laws. That much is undisputable. (There is plenty of religious hatred among the population, there have been hindu-muslim violence etc, that is also indisputable.)

This is utterly incorrect. Look at the policy and you will know. Pakistan goes after right wing terrorists with a vengeance and is fighting a war on terror that resulted in 50000+ dead. Has India ever waged war on Hindu extremists? So how can you make such a claim. This is the problem with some muslims left there. Too brainwashed to look at the only state that can come to your rescue positively.

The fact of the matter is that there are no large scale hindu insurgencies or hindu terrorist training camps in India, as there are Islam based ones in Pakistan. India's extremists are not a mirror image of Pakistan's. There is no way to go to war as a nation against an enemy that doesn't exist. There are hindu extremists, no doubt; but not the kind that requires military operations. The TTP, LeJ, LeT etc are real militias, with military grade weapons and training and tactics. India's hindu extremists are for the police to arrest, not for the nation to go to war against.

To make it clear, I would be the last to condone hindu (or any other) extremism. If the person who is the topic of this thread should murder somebody over beef or cows, I would want to see him behind bars for life.

Instead of believing that 200 million muslims in India are brainwashed into thinking this, maybe you should open your eyes to the possibility that you are the one with a misunderstanding about India, and not the muslims living in India as Indians?

Isn't it a bit patronizing and supercilious towards Indian muslims to think that they are all brainwashed, as if they are not capable of rational thought and objective analyses?

 

[haviZsultan]

I was talking about Pakistani society in general - people who have killed for religious reasons have become heroes - the murderer of governor Taseer, for instance. Even lawyers and judges were seen garlanding him.

And you're telling me Modi did not become a hero in India? The problem is common to both us and you.

Chances are that I have a lot more relatives in India, if that's a yardstick for truth claims. "Most muslims" before 1971 supporting Pakistan is a very fragile claim. Substantiate that, instead of asking me to deny it.

I have relatives who fully support Pakistan and they are our allies as well as our assets.

Pakistanis simply could not accept the fact that an equal, if not larger, number of muslims could and did live in India amongst hindus and sikhs and others. It strikes at the very reason for the existence of Pakistan, which is why it is difficult for Pakistanis to accept that.

There is nothing wrong with living peacefully with different religions. But when one religion imposes its rules on the other it is unfair. India has done this constantly.

There are communal troubles in India, no doubt. But by and large, the muslims of India lead similar lives as hindus and others.

As I said unless you suffer in such riots it is hard to make you understand the use and benefit of the formation of Pakistan. It was built for us. us Lucknowis Madrasis hyderabadis and others. If you cannot see it it is very unfortunate.

The crucial difference is that Modi was not convicted by any court. All the courts cleared him of all charges, due to lack of evidence. (As always, it doesn't necessarily mean he is innocent, just that there is no evidence to prove his guilt. That presumption of innocence until proven guilty is true in all common law societies.)

I'm no fan of Modi; but there is no different law for hindus and muslims, at least not criminal laws. If he was declared guilty by the courts, and still was allowed to walk free, that would be a travesty of justice. But the fact is that all the resources of the govt, when the opposition party was ruling the center, could not prove his guilt.

By the way, there are plenty of muslims who have waged war against India in the past, but laid down arms, and walked free. Yaseen Malik, for instance.

There is no systematic bias against muslims enshrined in Indian laws. That much is undisputable. (There is plenty of religious hatred among the population, there have been hindu-muslim violence etc, that is also indisputable.)



The fact of the matter is that there are no large scale hindu insurgencies or hindu terrorist training camps in India, as there are Islam based ones in Pakistan. India's extremists are not a mirror image of Pakistan's. There is no way to go to war as a nation against an enemy that doesn't exist. There are hindu extremists, no doubt; but not the kind that requires military operations. The TTP, LeJ, LeT etc are real militias, with military grade weapons and training and tactics. India's hindu extremists are for the police to arrest, not for the nation to go to war against.

To make it clear, I would be the last to condone hindu (or any other) extremism. If the person who is the topic of this thread should murder somebody over beef or cows, I would want to see him behind bars for life.

Instead of believing that 200 million muslims in India are brainwashed into thinking this, maybe you should open your eyes to the possibility that you are the one with a misunderstanding about India, and not the muslims living in India as Indians?

Isn't it a bit patronizing and supercilious towards Indian muslims to think that they are all brainwashed, as if they are not capable of rational thought and objective analyses?

Then was Malegaon and Samjhauta done by someone else? Not the Hindutvas?

 

[Kashmiri Pandit]

Who the Hell chose people like them as Candidates of India

 

[Hiptullha]

G A U M A T A
A
U
M
A
T
A

I was talking about Pakistani society in general - people who have killed for religious reasons have become heroes - the murderer of governor Taseer, for instance. Even lawyers and judges were seen garlanding him.

Indians have already built a temple for their pet mass murderer - Modi.

There are communal troubles in India, no doubt. But by and large, the muslims of India lead similar lives as hindus and others.

They will lead similar lives until a political party decides it needs more votes and campaigns against an ethnic or religious minority. Then all hell breaks loose and Indians will be caught raping, assaulting and immolating neighbours they've lived alongside entire lives.