U dont know the differnece between an organized religion and panth(path) or a way of life.okay.
I would call each indigious religion including sikhism as Panths rather than religion.
RSS books??
well u see Mr
Iqbal_Brar(UN flagwale..lol) not everyone fan of Khalistani propaganda .
yes, majority of muslims in india subcontinent are not "foreign blood,true??
But perceptions are differnent ...a number of pakistani or even BD one give a diffenert views.
ancestors were Hindus who
rejected Hinduism... ??
BS ,this country is still 80% hindu u idiot and if not for foreign invasions it their numbers would have been even more.
BTW,large number of ppl in north west india(pakistan) and even today's Banladesh were infact Buddist before Bin Quasim arrived the shore of sindh.Hence infact they rejected Buddism not hindusim,and Buddism disappeared ,while hinduism is around till today practiced by 900m ppl india.
Coming back to Sikhism,let me clear most ppl who got influenced by sikh gurus intially and later got baptized by Guru Gobind singhji and joined khasa force never thought they are leaving hinduism or as u stupidly put rejected Hinduism.Most didnt see differnece as u((UN flagwale) see it today.
If that was the case u would have never see long tradition of punjabi hindu families sending the kids to join khasla.
So u Iqbal _brar(UN flagwale) gonna decide who is real a Sikh,hann??
I never said Sikhs are hindus by religion .But Sikhism is started by hindus guru and his hindu follwers part of Bhati movement.
And later on the Khala forces are made of up boys punjabi hindu famiies who never saw its as an anti hindu cause,but a sturggle aganist moghul tyraany.
Thats the whole problem between ur assertions and my understanding.
Sikhs didnt came from somewhere outside punjab ,but gradually built by punjabi hindus joinin the movment in more numbers .
The fact that hindu families letting their kid become Sadar of khalsa army(not the whole family got converted),clearly shows punjabi hindu never saw it aganist hindu religion.Thats the crucial difference between whole hindu familes converting islam for various reasons.
The kasrmiri pundits who came seeking the Guru Tegh Bahadur's help were no hapless strangers as u and some here like to potray .They were friends and aquantance of the Sikh guru livig in near by kashmir.So infact the Sikh Guru choose help friends out.That part was delibarately omitted by khalistani groups.
Though the sikhs were not martial at time,but couregeous choose to defend the kashmiri pundits(essentally hindu priests by birh and professin ,not more martial hindus like Rajput or Maratha) and gave self sacrifice.
After his death Guru Gobind singh vowed to raise khalsa army and hindus of that region suppoted his casue by joined him and become sadars.
Well ,Sikhs are sikhs .I admire Sikhs a lot ,but not the (UN flagwale) type.
But dont support false canards like Sikhs were the saviours of hindus which is nonsense.
The fact of the matters is sikhs are themselves made off punjabi hindus who later become sadars .
Even then they had zero influnence outside punjab ,not even in Delhi.
By the time Ranjit Singh was ruling from Lahore,most of central india was under the marathas whose influnece the moghul seat of Delhi where moghul king for an emperor for name shake.
I am part Iranian... and Persian girlz are known around the world for being beautiful..
Thanks for correcting me biplob!! Most Muslims of India are also indigenous to India (I would say 99% of them?)
am just kidding... but I still think Pakistanis are foolish to accept urdu as their national language.. it is the mother tongue of Mohajirs... Pakistan's true languages are sindhi.. punjabi.. pashto.. balochi.. etc etc... no matter how u much u try to whine and cry wont change the fact urdu is an indic language.. originated in india.. and used by indian muslims... and is NOT the mother tongue of Pakistani muslims..
