Trying to make friends with Rajapakse is last in the list of his stupidities..
Well in a way.. He is too stupid that makes him unwelcome here
Ram Mandir in Ayodhya
- Thread starter ranjeet
- Start date
Trying to make friends with Rajapakse is last in the list of his stupidities..
Well in a way.. He is too stupid that makes him unwelcome here
jbond197
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2010
- Messages
- 7,300
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
How can you say that on all Indians behalf, when you yourself probably won't have done that? You voted for your regional leaders even if they were involved in solar scams, involved in rape of poor 16 year old by 60 people, involved in meeting a bomb blast accused and demanding his release. So come again what were the issues you voted on and be honest this time?
Indrani
BANNED
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2014
- Messages
- 3,379
- Reaction score
- -13
- Country
- Location
That is also the stand of the BJP govt. We cannot sacrifice the interest of India to Tamil chauvinism. We need Sri Lanka to be pro-India and not become the handmaiden of US or China. Tamils themselves are re-integrating back with the majority in Sri Lanka. You should be applauding the process. Many political parties tried to make capital of the atrocities on Tamil in Sri Lanka, guess what, they were shown the middle finger by the TN people.
In a year, he makes at least half a dozen trips to TN. From arguing in the courts to addressing people there, he is everywhere, so what makes you think he is unwelcome there?
Offtopic though
You need to realize that there is a lot of propaganda/attention diverting that goes on...He doesn't have the tact (read brain) to promote his twisted agenda, see his comments, he is too frank and doesn't even try a bit to hide is eccentricity,...
Modi is smart thats why he doesnt give any position to Dr.Swamy, he is too tactless...
Dr.Swamy doesnt have the brains of Amit Shah, he is just more popular version of Togadia...
Dr.Swamy cannot contribute anything good for this country..
And regarding SL Tamils I think you are too uninformed.. do read about TNA govt and their demads for equal rights that has been turned down by Rajapakse..
Nothing good can happen from him..
If you are so bothered about friendly neighbours, surely Independednt tamil ealam makes better neighbour than Singhalese SL
Offtopic though
I said I voted for BJP
Dont embarass yourself by trying to sell smartness to me
Indischer
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2013
- Messages
- 4,844
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
You make very valid points about what ails the Communist thought process and the reasons for unabated brain-drain. But unfortunately, you seem to have failed to get the gist of what Scorpionx is trying to emphasize here, which is the role and duty of the Government towards it's citizens.
Why should a Government that calls itself secular be concerned with whether Hindus collectively want a mandir or Muslims collectively want a Mosque or Christians collectively want a Church? The Law of the land should take it's course and let the religious leaders, not political leaders, of respective communities worry about securing funds and manpower.
The elected Governments have failed in their primary duty, which is to provide material necessities/comforts where needed to our citizens. As such, they should concern themselves with infrastructure, sanitation, defence, food availability, jobs etc. If the Government has done a splendid job in these areas and still has loads of time left on their hands, maybe then they need to concern themselves with matters of religion. But have they done a good job in their primary areas of responsibility so far?
And have you ever come across Scorpionx advocating that industries should not be set up or new companies and offices should not come up or that our people should not get jobs as per their intellectual and professional abilities? Where then, comes this accusation that he's a Communist and his ideology is against development? If anything, he's lamenting most of the times over the wrong priorities taken by our Governments, in that development takes a backburner over other trivial issues in which the Government need not even have a say in the first place!
You need more industries? have it! You want R&D? have it! You want jobs commensurate with your level of intellect? have them! You need good sanitation and clean air and unadulterated food? Have them! You want security against aggression, external and internal? Have it! Only, don't ever say it's the duty of the Government with providing you these necessities....their focus needs to be elsewhere.
Indrani
BANNED
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2014
- Messages
- 3,379
- Reaction score
- -13
- Country
- Location
Why should everyone have tact? It is this tactfulness which has made us a country of spineless wenches. He is unafraid of speaking truth and he should continue to do so. If he had been a tactful person, then neither 2G scam nor the multitude of scams would have ever come to light. He was the one who turned the mood of the people of this country against Congress.
Sri Lanka has a democratic constitution and equal rights does not mean like Pakistanis were demanding in India, 25% Muslims equal to 75% NonMuslims. That kind of parity will never be given anywhere in the world. If you mean 1 person 1 vote, then yes I think Sri Lanka is already following that, if not, then questions may be asked.
No I would not encourage people to break a country due to ethnicity or any narrow identity issue. My country itself is made up by merging many such identities for a greater good.
As i said you are uninformed..
dray
BANNED
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2013
- Messages
- 10,853
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
You are 231 posts old, you can easily post links, stop giving pathetic excuses.
In any case I see no reason to help you do research just because you are lazy to do it on your own
You posting generic links only proves my point. Might as well post link to Google and claim it is to help me....Pathetic.
So far you have FAILED to prove ANYTHING. You only CLAIM to know something but provide NO EVIDENCE of the same.
Very idiotic, how do I prove that a "Non-existing Law" doesn't exist? Have you lost your mind or you never had any to begin with?
If a law doesn't exist, any amount of blabbering doesn't make it an existing law. Your stupid logic doesn't help here. If you have built a temple on your own land and did "Pran pratistha", you don't automatically lose ownership of your land, neither the land & temple automatically gets transferred in the name of the deity, it becomes Debottar only when you voluntarily transfer the title of the property in the name of the deity, otherwise not. Now stop blabbering. As for evidence, if the law is non-existent, do you want proof of its non-existence? Try proving that "Pikomatulegobiztik" is a non-existent animal!!
I just mentioned Modi pulling down temples to build road just to show you that the temples & its land didn't automatically become the properties of the deities there, they remained government property. And you didn't even get this simple thing!!
Go read forum rules again you fool. You need to be in the forum for a certain minimum number of days to be able to post links. Stop proving that your are an @ss.
Very idiotic, how do I prove that a "Non-existing Law" doesn't exist? Have you lost your mind or you never had any to begin with?
LOL.... what an absurd argument
..you are required to evidence the law that exists where temple ownership is transferred to the deity. Give us the pages from your own precious links. 
If a law doesn't exist, any amount of blabbering doesn't make it an existing law. Your stupid logic doesn't help here. If you have built a temple on your own land and did "Pran pratistha", you don't automatically lose ownership of your land, neither the land & temple automatically gets transferred in the name of the deity, it becomes Debottar only when you voluntarily transfer the title of the property in the name of the deity, otherwise not. Now stop blabbering. As for evidence, if the law is non-existent, do you want proof of its non-existence? Try proving that "Pikomatulegobiztik" is a non-existent animal!!
If you own land and do a prana prathistha pooja and Consecrate that deity in the temple the that land ownership automatically transfers to the deity. Otherwise the trustees of the temple can always claim that the consercation was not done and try to sell the land
........Temple land can never to sold to another person. At worse you can only lease it. I have already given an example where the TN govt. forcible tried to take over ownership of the Chidambaram temple.You are the one making the claims so the onus of the proof is on you
.... don't Pikomatulegobiztik out of it. For all you blabbering, NOT ONE SHRED of evidence has been produced till date 
I just mentioned Modi pulling down temples to build road just to show you that the temples & its land didn't automatically become the properties of the deities there, they remained government property. And you didn't even get this simple thing!!
What do I care why you gave that example
....... but that example clearly demonstrates why shrines pop up all over the countryside to help lay claim to that land. In Mumbai, next to Hiranandani gardens there is a hanuman temple RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE of the Road. Nobody can move it because the priests claim that the land and temple belongs to the deity. You will find millions of such examples all over India. Only you are selectively blind to the truth. High courts of ALL states are filled with cases against such make shift "temples" that the municipality cannot move or demolish. Consult a good lawyer or just google it up.
I am a snake. Or a 'Sunny Leone of the Sangh'. @nair
Looks like being a fence sitter has not helped you much
.......... learnt any lessons yet ?
Last edited:
Part of the problem is that temples are controlled by the govt in India, and in fact it takes all the revenue (including donations) earned by the temple and any other assets the temple might own. I think this needs to go. Swami was fighting case against this(refer here Freeing temples from state control - The Hindu) Since they take all the revenue, it's not totally unfair to expect the govt to fund the temple.
A govt that considers itself secular shouldn't really give Hajj subsidy either ( this is supposed to be ending by 2022).
Last edited:
Cowardice do not respect the north south divide.
........ I have seen enough North Indians who has the courage to stand up for their beliefs. North Indians have fought a LOT more and lost a LOT more than south Indians so its not fair to make that statement. Its their blood sacrifice that kept the south safe for the longest time by delaying the islamic advance.
Indrani
BANNED
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2014
- Messages
- 3,379
- Reaction score
- -13
- Country
- Location
You are 231 posts old, you can easily post links, stop giving pathetic excuses.
Very idiotic, how do I prove that a "Non-existing Law" doesn't exist? Have you lost your mind or you never had any to begin with?
If a law doesn't exist, any amount of blabbering doesn't make it an existing law. Your stupid logic doesn't help here. If you have built a temple on your own land and did "Pran pratistha", you don't automatically lose ownership of your land, neither the land & temple automatically gets transferred in the name of the deity, it becomes Debottar only when you voluntarily transfer the title of the property in the name of the deity, otherwise not. Now stop blabbering. As for evidence, if the law is non-existent, do you want proof of its non-existence? Try proving that "Pikomatulegobiztik" is a non-existent animal!!
I just mentioned Modi pulling down temples to build road just to show you that the temples & its land didn't automatically become the properties of the deities there, they remained government property. And you didn't even get this simple thing!!
Go read forum rules again you fool. You need to be in the forum for a certain minimum number of days to be able to post links. Stop proving that your are an @ss.
LOL.... what an absurd argument
If you own land and do a prana prathistha pooja and Consecrate that deity in the temple the that land ownership automatically transfers to the deity. Otherwise the trustees of the temple can always claim that the consercation was not done and try to sell the land
You are the one making the claims so the onus of the proof is on you
What do I care why you gave that example
High courts of ALL states are filled with cases against such make shift "temples" that the municipality cannot move or demolish. Consult a good lawyer or just google it up.
Looks like being a fence sitter has not helped you much
In the case of Ayodhya, Ram Lalla was considered a litigant and given 1/3rd the share of the property by the Allahabad court.
Ram Lalla, the litigant in the Ayodhya case
Cowardice do not respect the north south divide.
North Indians have fought a LOT more and lost a LOT more than south Indians so its not fair to make that statement. Its their blood sacrifice that kept the south safe for the longest time by delaying the islamic advance.
They did fight to save their neck. When they lost, they formed alliances with the Muslims and were attacking the South.
True you will find courage in the Rajasthanis and the Haryavanis (surprising for their proximity to Delhi), but just look at UP and WB. Much of the elite and middle class there are politically correct creatures.
Part of the problem is that temples are controlled by the govt in India, and in fact it takes all the revenue (including donations) earned by the temple and any other assets the temple might own. I think this needs to go. Swami was fighting case against this(refer here Freeing temples from state control - The Hindu Since they take all the revenue, it's not totally unfair to expect the govt to fund the temple.
A govt that considers itself secular shouldnt really give Hajj subsidy either ( this is supposed to be ending by 2022).
They are blind and they will not understand this.
Last edited:
Thank you for bringing that up.
I probably should have done it in the first place, but I thought my posts were clear enough for him to understand ....... instead he went of in a tangent claiming that he was required to prove a negative I wonder if the "secularist" DRAY will now claim that Ram Lalla was the registered owners of that land and the waqf board transferred that land registration to Ram lalla
Similar threads
