ramu
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2010
- Messages
- 3,372
- Reaction score
- 0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you give up already, If conventionally your arse will get burned by indians then why even peruse for any projects. If what I said gave you Anger try managing your anger Your PAF's action will come to haunt you it will be smelt all the way upto UK before it touch down in Canada.
Here we noticed the negative approach, "do you think game would change". So the suggestion is to not buy since game can't be changed by a couple of squadrons this means a single squadron of F-16s too can't/won't change the game. That was a terrible negative assessment. The same finger points at those who hooray for 60/70 F-16s. Seems some people over here have lost their faith in the Air Force and the ground teams that they would not be able to cope with the technology. Please spare us of such lame excuses and nonsense. If Pakistan could deal back then with brand spanking new F-16s during 1980s with technology relatively very new at that time then surely we are able to deal with Rafales.
Let me again remind men over here of the fact that thailand and vietnam and a few other nations are operating SU-30/SU-27 and Gripens so why are we reluctant going on backfoot. Its a shame people don't have credible evidence of PAF unable to cope with Rafales and always have excuses.
So the question is why did PAF test trial Mirage 2000s/Tornados/Gripen/Rafale Just to have joy ride?? If PAF was unable to get these then what was the point in testing them were Europeans fools to let PAF fool them.
So if india is going to burn PAF's arse then why even go for thunders and imaginary FC-20s...go hit you selves, I stay corrected today's Air Force need to have the punch to go offensive as well. You and like minded men have given up that is all clear from your post. If that is the psyche of PAF then there it is the beginning of the end of the Air Force.
And no money was never the problem, when you people were toying with Mirage 2000s and Tornados that wasn't for fun and then you ditched it for cheap F-7s not once but twice where did the rest of money go. Let me remind you again $3.1 Billion dollars for 18 F-16s, weapons and other systems. That could have been channeled to 36 Rafales easily and Yes we could have maintained in your own words we are flying old french mirages due to financial trouble though its not true we could have replaced many of them in favor of a better new platform to give an all out advantage. Common sense old airframes consume more money.
It will take a real war more likely with the US to put that one to rest. The hostilities between US and Pakistan at this rate will give all enough news on that. However, the topic here is F16 vs Rafale right ?
Nomithe cost of rafale is twice as f-16 block 52+
rafale is twin engine jet while f-16 is single engine jet
if India will choose euro typhoon than Pakistan will purchase rafale or if India choose rafale than Pakistan will purchase euro typhoon
that thing is irritating India
the cost of rafale is twice as f-16 block 52+
rafale is twin engine jet while f-16 is single engine jet
if India will choose euro typhoon than Pakistan will purchase rafale or if India choose rafale than Pakistan will purchase euro typhoon
that thing is irritating India
the cost of rafale is twice as f-16 block 52+
rafale is twin engine jet while f-16 is single engine jet
if India will choose euro typhoon than Pakistan will purchase rafale or if India choose rafale than Pakistan will purchase euro typhoon
that thing is irritating India
the cost of rafale is twice as f-16 block 52+
rafale is twin engine jet while f-16 is single engine jet
if India will choose euro typhoon than Pakistan will purchase rafale or if India choose rafale than Pakistan will purchase euro typhoon
that thing is irritating India
Lets keep India out, shall we. We have not finalised Rafale yet. For what its worth, u have made a complete U turn
Actually the PAF does not have the money to buy any of the two.Thats why they decide to go with the JF-17 which costs 1/5th or close to 1/6th of Rafale and 1/7th of Typhoon
Actually the PAF does not have the money to buy any of the two.Thats why they decide to go with the JF-17 which costs 1/5th or close to 1/6th of Rafale and 1/7th of Typhoon
Look at it from a strategic point of view, Dollar for Dollar, you send say a Rafale for one mission and six JFT for the other, if the Rafale gets hit, it's adiós where as even 50% of the JFTs survive, they will still be able to do some damage. !!
Look at it from a strategic point of view, Dollar for Dollar, you send say a Rafale for one mission and six JFT for the other, if the Rafale gets hit, it's adiós where as even 50% of the JFTs survive, they will still be able to do some damage. !!