What's new

Rafale & Sukhoi Can't Replace Each Other: IAF Chief

SpArK

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 5, 2010
Messages
22,519
Reaction score
18
Country
India
Location
India
Rafale & Sukhoi Can't Replace Each Other: IAF Chief

Thursday, February 19, 2015

P1050885.jpg



Amidst swirling speculation that India's M-MRCA jet deal with Rafale is shuddering through final lap turbulence, and suggestions (including by Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar himself) that the India could buy more Su-30 MKI jets if the Rafale deal didn't work out, Indian Air Force chief Arup Raha today publicly declared that the Rafale and Su-30 were different aircraft and that one couldn't replace the other.

"There's M-MRCA and there's Sukhoi-30. The requirements are slightly different. And they have their own capabilities. They compliment each other but do not replace each other," Raha said at his press conference at the Aero India show in Bengaluru.

Making clear the IAF's own thoughts on open suggestions that 'other options' existed in the event of a deal collapse, Raha said, "No, we don’t have a Plan-B as of now. We are only working on Plan-A."

The IAF chief also stated, in what could be perceived as a sense of resignation over the turbulence negotiations have seen over the last 18 months, "Rafale has been selected as L1. It is a replacement. It is important that we have the MMRCA, I would not say Rafale. But we need to have it in the quickest possible time because the draw-down is true. Everyone is aware of the draw-down of combat squadrons of the IAF. Every air force faces this in its cycle of operations. It is not new or specific to IAF."


LIVEFIST: Rafale & Sukhoi Can't Replace Each Other: IAF Chief
 
. .
Finally a voice that must be heard. If Rafale isn't making the cut (price, ToT, guarantees..), we must talk and get EFT. More MKI just don't make sense.

The problem is the Price which the Frenchies are demanding

A Su30MKI cost 58 Million USD, add the proposed Super 30 upgrade being discussed, and the Figure goes up to 81 Million USD.
Rafale on the other hand will cost 120 Million USD each
 
. .
Statement is Directly show the Motive that, IAF not need Su-30 instead Rafale. Intention is clear, though Defence Ministry got problem with it as their intention is not to show the hidden agenda ;)

By the way "Omnirole" Rafale is not multirole; photo is set to upset
 
.
Probably IAF is struck with Add-ons which they themselves do not want, due to which all aircraft including Tejas is getting delayed. (i.e. Know how, industrial adv etc).
At the end of the day IAF seems to be the loser.
 
.
Ironic considering that MMRCA(rafale) could replace MRCA(Mirage,f-16,f-18) requirement but when it comes to su-30 and rafale the IAF goes vocal. MMRCA is manufacturer driven deal, MRCA or a m2000 class aircraft was the original need.
 
. . .
I am hoping we don't. They are too expensive. Maybe we should consider the L2 bidder Eurofighter?

Don't believe the media reports the price is somewhere around 12 billion & not 20
 
. . . . .
The original price of the deal was some 12 billion,so if he says price has not changed
Conclusion
Price is still 12 billion
What he said
"The pricing issue is very clear. Our pricing remains the same from day one of LI (Lowest bidder). So there has been no change on that front,"
What you said The original price of the deal was some 12 billion,so if he says price has not changed
:rolleyes:
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom