What's new

Pulwama - From Bluster to a Whimper

I am just waiting for Tall gay to come and say that the only way that KT blog can be explained is multiple kills by PAF ie more than two :azn:

BTW tallguy no offence...

He sticks with 08 kills with details. TK also hinted more then two kills....
 
. .
I am just waiting for Tall gay to come and say that the only way that KT blog can be explained is multiple kills by PAF ie more than two :azn:

BTW tallguy no offence...

At least 8. No compromise.
 
.
it seems ...but lack of substantial evidence has restricted us to announce it.
 
. .
1)Writer has completely ruled out Jf17 involvement in bvr strikes.

2) Su 30 hit is not confirmed as per the article.

More like an Indian version. And most probably true since PAF has failed to bring any evidence about Su30 kill other than lips serving.

Anyways Feb 27 did the job very well for us. Indians now might think a lot before even dare to do something stupid again. Bipin silence after Feb 27 has proved that.
 
. . .
Yes. Kaiser Tufail does some of the literary works for PAF as well. If you notice he didn't reveal a lot. Most of the things he mentioned are already discussed to death on media.


Fine....Windy hinted in other thread that PAF official are going to have a presser in coming days....might have full awaited details...lets see.
 
.
. .
Nope don't take my word.

Take Kaiser Tufails. He confirmed all my claims in his one report.

Here's the thing, his words contradict the words of AM Shahid Latif. I would probably take the word of Shahid Latif simply owing to his seniority.

Well, 'know' is a strong word that implies certainty. I am taking everything with a grain of salt. We have television recordings of AVM Shahid Latif crediting Thunders with the kills, so its not like I am giving weight to an impossible scenario. I am simply observing both sides and not taking a position.

Exactly. AVM Shahid Latif is the senior most PAF official to have made the claims, and i would probably take his word for that.
 
.
Here's the thing, his words contradict the words of AM Shahid Latif. I would probably take the word of Shahid Latif simply owing to his seniority.

I will not. Why?

During those interviews and volatile times. If you notice AM Shahid Lateef's body language, It is not very content. He never DIRECTLY said JF-17s shot down Migs or SUs. He was narrated the incident by the anchor and he used to add to it by saying "jee bilkul xyz' and from there the he used to reiterate the importance of JF-17 program. He has rarely explicitly stated that these kills belong to JF-17.

Where as Kaiser Tufails son in law is currently stationed on vipers in Sargodha. Hours after this engagement, he had put up a status congratulating the viper guys. It means the inside information is always more credible then whatever the official stance of ISPR maybe.
 
. .
You are right, but I was referring to the @Tallguy claims.
Here's the thing, his words contradict the words of AM Shahid Latif. I would probably take the word of Shahid Latif simply owing to his seniority.



Exactly. AVM Shahid Latif is the senior most PAF official to have made the claims, and i would probably take his word for that.

AVM sb was probably asked to take JFT line...after all this bird needs a push...F16 does not.

and pardon me our SU30's claim is as weak as Indian's F16...unless we show irrefutable evidence.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom