Maybe you dont understand the concept of a weapon like Nasr...
Leave it, it's not that important a missile anyway.
Than which "bombs" are you talking about.... although most people here are only quoting Shakti devices testedin pokhran...
Although there were some sub-kiloton nukes tested back then, these are far from I refer to when
I say Miniature Nukes. We have been working on Miniature nukes since Shakti-2 but the stuff I'm
talking was validated only in late 90s to early 2000s.
What Im talking about are nukes having yield higher than those heavy ones tested in Shakti,
while weighing atleast 70% lesser and much smaller. They are validated (and continue to be
routinely tested) in supercomputer-assisted simulations.
It's hard to find info regarding these bombs on net but anyway you're talking about
miniature nukes w/ low yield for Tactical role while I'm talking miniature nukes w/ high yield for
somewhat strategic role.
Than kindly dont negate facts without any substance either..
What "facts" have I negated?
Is it me or is it your bad comprehension skills? where did i say that Shaheen III was in service? i merely stated something about its development....
That's what I'm saying, genius! No missile exists in real world until it is tested. If it's in
"development" then it only is in dream world.
And there's no real point in it when you
mention that missile when I'm talking about existing stuff.
You said :
Shaheen III with a range of 4500 Km could be used...
How could it be used when it hasn't even been validated/cleared for performing some role?
Next time il ask ISPR to hire you for such making one...
You can hire anyone except a jingo. Let me show you how a missile's range is mapped out
on a world map...
^^You can see how unevenly a missile's range distributes around the globe while talking
into consideration the place of launch, gravitational patterns, and all the technical mumbo jumbo.
Here's a Chinese one: -
The Chinese one above originates from the 2010 annual report on China's missile forces
by the
US Department of Defence.
Take a look at the range lines, that's how a missile's effective range is gauged. And take a look
at your "official" documentary. Those ultra-straight lines, those ridiculous lighting effects,
are you sure you didn't take this pic out of a discotheque?
Reminds me of something I saw in G.I. JOE on Cartoon Network as a child.
ISPR atleast needs to work on it's presentation methods, all I can say is that this can be
anything but official.
