Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok... so, where in the world are you?
And do you mean that "Indians" and "Chinese" don't get along well, else where .. Londonstan etc.
Remembering "Londonstan" .... HongWu ..... is it a play on the words London and Pakistan ?
...
india's physical and philosophical strength lie in the Aryavarta or the hindi speaking belt in the Northern part and that should be the target. China needs to form and fund more institutions which can study india as gathering knowledge about your enemy is strategically important.
Looks like India is going to take the seat and worry about Veto 10-15 years down the road when the restriction runs out.
As I said before this is not about India getting permanent seat at UNSC..but rather India being elected to a Non permanent seat with 180 votes..
As we all know non permanent are without a veto.
Infact India has become a non permanent member after almost two decades, as it had placed self imposed restrictions on itself to not contest for non permanent seats..till it is considered a permanent seat in UNSC.
PS: Just do not go on the heading ..read the content of the article.
PS: Just do not go on the heading ..read the content of the article.
According to the diplomatic sources placed in UN, told ‘Live India’ that India is near about completed its negotiations with all 192 countries in which around 180 had given their nod for India in UNSC as
permanent member. 128 votes required to get a permanent seat in security council.
It's kind of pointless to be a permanent SC member without veto power, but it's still a very big step from a diplomatic standpoint.
This is a historical undertaking that has never been done before.
It's kind of pointless to be a permanent SC member without veto power, but it's still a very big step from a diplomatic standpoint.
This is a historical undertaking that has never been done before.
No this is news about permanent membership. The United Nations Security Council election you're talking about were held on 12 October 2010.This article was published today. Written on 21 Feb, 2011 at 19:53 in India.
It would help that you yourself read the article.
“But we will take the seat and start our negotiations for getting the veto too”, he added.
Fifteen years later?
Who knows what things will be like in fifteen years.
Veto power should not be expanded. It is already difficult enough to run the UNSC with only five vetoes.
Third, new permanent members shall have the same rights and obligations as the
current permanent members. However, if some of the new permanent members decide
not to enforce their veto right till such a time as a comprehensive review is undertaken,
they should be allowed to do so. This would of course be without prejudice to the
proportionate changes in the minimum numbers needed to take decisions on matters
other than the procedural ones in the reformed Council. This also does not however
preclude from the immediacy of the task at hand, namely for restricting or limiting the
use of the veto under certain circumstances such as: genocide, crimes against humanity
and serious violations of international humanitarian law; war crimes, ethnic cleansing
and terrorism.