What's new

Police stop religious gatherings in Indian Kashmir

man it's round and round circus for both of us. We say that please restore kashmir Pundits in the kashmir valley who migrated from the vally and you demand for plebisite. It's not going anywhere.

If you had done the vote when you had promised then this would a non issue.
so it is very unfair to everyone that you insist on restoration of a condition that was of your own doing.

Still, I say give the people who live in Kashmir a vote.
 
If you had done the vote when you had promised then this would a non issue.
so it is very unfair to everyone that you insist on restoration of a condition that was of your own doing.

Still, I say give the people who live in Kashmir a vote.

Again the short, sweet and simple answer is 'NO', Going to get a cup of tea?
 
Balouchistan is not a disuputed territory within UN, but Kashmir is.
 
If you had done the vote when you had promised then this would a non issue.
so it is very unfair to everyone that you insist on restoration of a condition that was of your own doing.

Still, I say give the people who live in Kashmir a vote.

When UN passed that resolution you captured 60% of Kashmir. Couldn't possible. let it be. Plebiscite is no more relevant. Even UN accepted that now.
 
U.N. envoy Asma Jahangir says India risks religious violence


By Alistair Scrutton

NEW DELHI | Thu Mar 20, 2008 4:29pm IST

NEW DELHI (Reuters) - The U.N. freedom of religion investigator warned on Thursday that India risks more religious violence, like Gujarat's 2002 riots that killed 2,500 people, as delays to bring justice encouraged an atmosphere of impunity.

"All these incidents continue to haunt the people affected by them and impunity emboldens forces of intolerance," Asma Jahangir told a news conference as she finished off a tour of India.

"Today there is a real risk that similar communal violence might happen again unless incitement to religious hatred and political exploitation of communal tensions are effectively prevented," said Jahangir, who is a Pakistani rights activist.

India's constitution is secular. Hindus account for 80 percent of India's billion-plus population, while Muslims account for about 13 percent, Christians less than 3 percent and minorities such as Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains and Parsis the rest.

Over the past two decades, India has suffered major religious riots between its different communities, like in the western state of Gujarat in 2002 when mainly Muslims were massacred by Hindu nationalists.

"Even today there is increasing ghettoization and isolation of Muslims in certain areas," she said, referring to Gujarat state run by controversial Hindu nationalist Narendra Modi.

But many of the perpetuators of religious riots have never been jailed amid a slow judicial system and what critics say is government inertia.

Jahangir criticised the slowness of government inquiries into previous religious clashes.

She said she was "astonished" that one government commission probing the demolition of a 16th century mosque in the northern Indian town of Ayodhya had received a 44th deadline extension.

The demolition of the mosque by Hindu nationalists sparked the 1993 bombings in Mumbai which killed 257 people. Those attacks were blamed on Muslim gangsters.

Jahangir criticised law enforcement authorities for being reluctant to act against perpetuators of religious violence.

"At the same time, organised groups based on religious ideologies have unleashed the fear of mob violence in many parts of the country," she said.

"This institutionalised impunity for those who exploit religion and impose their religious intolerance on others has made peaceful citizens, particularly the minorities, vulnerable and fearful."

Jahangir, known as the United Nations Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion, highlighted attacks on Indians marrying people from different castes and religions in northern India, and attacks on Christians, lower castes and tribal people in Orissa last year.

In Orissa, where many churches were attacked around Christmas last year, she said there were credible reports that members of the Christian community had alerted authorities in advance


link:

U.N. envoy Asma Jahangir says India risks religious violence | Reuters
 
A curfew is 21 year long in the largest democracy.
 
indian_occupied_kashmir.jpg


check the photos on the link below,you will cry...

http://soskashmir.wordpress.com/tag/indian-occupied-kashmir/
 
So according to Indians democracy has a time limit.
Man I am really scared for the worlds larges "democracy"
next thing you know, the politicians of India will be saying "we promised you corruption free governance a long time ago, so you don't have any rights to expect it now"
or
"your loved one was murdered too long ago so we cant charge anyone with murder"

I would say that this is perfectly logical by Indian standards :whistle:
 
When and which?:what:

---------- Post added at 09:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:25 PM ----------



I can post many tibetian protesters pic. including a monk burning himself. But i am nt interested that piss contest.
don't behave like innocent , just read your ahmadi and uyhgar related posts...... Why you always show your back when it comes to kashmir?
 
So according to Indians democracy has a time limit.
Man I am really scared for the worlds larges "democracy"
next thing you know, the politicians of India will be saying "we promised you corruption free governance a long time ago, so you don't have any rights to expect it now"
or
"your loved one was murdered too long ago so we cant charge anyone with murder"

I would say that this is perfectly logical by Indian standards :whistle:

After that long thread not even worth to comment. Go through the posts and you will know why Sinochallanger run away

---------- Post added at 09:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:33 PM ----------

don't behave like innocent , just read your ahmadi and uyhgar related posts...... Why you always show your back when it comes to kashmir?

I was replying to one Pakistani who was commenting on Indian democracy. You want some you get some.
 
When and which?:what:

---------- Post added at 09:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:25 PM ----------



I can post many tibetian protesters pic. including a monk burning himself. But i am nt interested that piss contest.

ok,go ahead,those monks commit suicide were their own choice,and you guys are murderers.
 
After that long thread not even worth to comment. Go through the posts and you will know why Sinochallanger run away

---------- Post added at 09:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:33 PM ----------



I was replying to one Pakistani who was commenting on Indian democracy. You want some you get some.
Show any of your post related to kashmir in this thread? anyone have strong preception ?
 
When there is a law and order problem that is smelled in a gathering that might shake the sprit of unity, then every country and its armed forces have the right to impose curfew.
To the thread starter, democracy does not mean that you can do any thing(barbaric) that shakes the peace, tranqulity and unity of the nation.
There is no big fuzz in a curfew, when and where ever there is a civil dis-order, curfew is necessary to stop loss of life and property that might errupt due to it.
 
Back
Top Bottom