Cool_Soldier
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2011
- Messages
- 1,740
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Enough discussion..stop this thread till second Boat is commissioned in PN.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then it will ended in the same fate of the last sub which tried to sink indian AC in 71
Or like the one which sank INS Kukri with all hands aboard and damaged the INS Kirpan. BTW Ghazi did not sink due to enemy action and in 65 IN aircraft carrier did not even leave the port thanks to one WWII vintage submarine.
In 1965 the carrier was in dry dock and was in the process of refitting ....
Why would they care about a submarine whose sailors have no idea of laying mines and explode themselves ???
That is spin to make you guys feel good and if one goes by that view 75% of IN fleet was going through refit in 65 as it never came out of Bombay. Or was Vikrant conveniently drydocked to avoid going to high seas?
And talking of expertise after WWII there has been only one confirmed incident of a warship being sunk by a submarine, yes the warship was Indian and the submarine Pakistani.
I will be dam p1ssed to see SSBN in PN inventory because it is SUPER expensive and our awam are dying of hunger! CM BM etc are actually very economical to operate then SSBN so you can not use that analogy for your argument.
Then it will ended in the same fate of the last sub which tried to sink indian AC in 71
Hi,
In a war---you have to look at it this way---as a warrior of a smaller nation---where did I die---in your backyard or in my backyard---and if in your backyard---how far in---.
It may endure the same fate but for once if it did not---and found its target---. You know---sh-it happens.
In 1965 the carrier was in dry dock and was in the process of refitting ....
Why would they care about a submarine whose sailors have no idea of laying mines and explode themselves ???
And how old are you?? This is more like talking back for the sake of talking vs. actually giving factual information
My age doesnot change facts and factual information is given in post 350 .......
well the sub was indeed destroyed or sank in enemy's backyard but the rest of losses suffered by PN were in our own backyard