serenity
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2007
- Messages
- 2,102
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
Agni missiles exist in PPT form only. They are imaginary like the tooth fairy.
They have some working now but last year another testing of some ballistic missiles failed which India already put into service aiya. How these guys put something into service only after testing two times and then during service failed its trial when less than 5 times this thing has been tested. Most Agni missiles have yet to reach ranges which China achieved in 1970s and 1980s for long range ones and short range accuracy and warhead yields are so low they are like 1940s German V2 technology or very early Russian Scud missile levels. So embarrassing. Their submarine "ballistic missiles" have less range than some Chinese high school kid's projects
I think it's a shame their politicians talk so much and deliver to their civilization so little.
They have not even made Nirbhay successful and China's had its first cruise missile Silkworm HY/SY/FL series cruise missiles in service by 1980. Now China's had since more than three generations of anti-ship cruise missiles and air to surface ones and at least two generations of land attack and surface to surface super long range types.
The only threatening Indian missile is brahmos but even that they don't have thousands of and we have so much better YJ series which are similar in performance to brahmos. Hypersonics are even better. Brahmos can be intercepted using layers of S-400, HQ-9B, S-300PMU, HQ-22, HQ-16B, HQ-17, HQ,12, HQ-7, LD-2000. They think Brahmos stands a chance against almost nine layers of air defence for most important protected sites? Before our hypersonic DF-100 annihilates everything they have?
Last edited: