Not sure what are you trying to imply.
Half naked women are also squatting the Saudi beaches like halfmoon beach, durrat al arros, Nakheel etc? Try advocating a revolution in KSA and Ye shall taste thee medicine!
I am enjoying this "picture perfect" and sort of nostalgic thread, so I have resisted to urge to post anything political. But I think there are enough comments including this one, to say something about the real about Iran instead of saying good or bad things about women.
We have to be careful about mixing "freedom of expression" with only "half naked women".
The reason is that "half naked women" card is usually a distortion or perhaps distraction for those who want freedom to live their lives, and freedom to adapt and progress.
At the hight of Shah's time, only a tiny percentage of Iranian women could be termed "half naked women". Why because most Iranians were and even now middle of the road folks who want a life with self-respect and dignity.
Similarly Saudis of today can and do use "half naked women" card as a distortion to peddle one or the other kind of believe system.
In reality most of the Saudi women do not want to be turned into "half naked women" instead they simply want good future for their kids.
So what matters most is that a given society learns to tolerate the opposing view, and uses such an environment for innovation in arts, science, economy, and overall philosophy of life.
Many iran watchers / posters know but do not realize the breadth and depth of an internal struggle between pro-West forces, and anti-West forces during Shah's time. And none of these sides was championing freedom to innovate in arts, philosophy, economy, and science.
Similarly today, we should not look at few beaches of Saudi to say they have become pro-freedom. Why because most of the Saudi society is still evolving from deep seeded tribal culture, where personal safety is of prime importance rather than free expression in arts, science, economy, and overall philosophy.
Many Pakistanis do not reckon that both Irani and Saudi heartlands (unlike large cosmopolitan cities) are only a little bit more evolved in social terms, compared to our tribal areas like FATA. The only difference is that they have oil coming out of ground, and our FATA does not (at least not in comparable quantities).
Do you expect our FATA to suddenly become progress-oriented if they are allow their area to have "half naked women"?
No. Certainly not.
What we really need is to have modern systems to run these areas, the concept of "rule of law", and a justice system that is based on "accusatorial" approach instead of "Inquisitorial", corporate laws to deal with country's economy, and universities filled with students who can question anything and everything including the concept of God himself.
Both Saudi and Irani societies like so many developing countries, lack such systems. One could argue that a relatively secular environment during Shah's time would eventually have allowed the said institutions to prosper, and there may be some truth to that.
However Iranians as a nation were not willing to go along Shah's vision. Like so many developing countries of 1950s, the educated elite of Iran was strongly pro-Socialism and thus to a lesser degree but still significantly anti-USA in particular. Zulfiqar Bhutto of Pakistan, Indira Gandhi of India, Gamal Nasir of Egypt were all educated but extreme socialists and thus carried and planted seeds for anti-US in particular and anti-West in general. Musddeqh of Iran was no exception.
Thus Shah was clearly out of touch with his own people.
While PM Mosaddegh was willing to sell his nation to the socialism without ever realizing that such a populist drive would pit his nascent and relatively weak nation against the powerful anti-Communist forces from US and UK.
This is how Mosaddegh won the hearts of socialists and leftists in the region (and he still does), but in the process ended up taking his country to direction that ultimately led to his dismissal and then demise of Shah's rule, but also paving the way for even worst chauvinism to be unleashed on the unsuspecting Iranian populace.
So please do not just look at "half naked women" to decide for or against a regime. Other policies including economic (90% weight) and foreign (9% of weight) policies must be looked as well. Only then we all would be able to see what went wrong with a beautiful country like Iran and why a hell has descended on them in the form Mullah regime.
peace to you all.
p.s. No disrespect intended. You know me well enough by now to realize this. Thank you.