haris.ahmed
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2015
- Messages
- 11
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
1)Democracy doesnt meet that the leader who has looted us deny accountability.With the great difficulty people got Marshall law rid of, now Imran Khan is trying to bring Marshall Law back again through Islamabad lockdown bringing every anti-Pakistani elements joining together to challenge the democracy as whole, and tried the same in the last dharna where military takeover almost became reality, but didn't become one thanks to the understanding between both Sharifs.
2) Asked Imran khan regarding this issue. There was no mandate for Justice wajhi to pass orders, leaks were made against opponents . when ask for the proofs on which bases decisions are made no proof was given. BTW was there any accountability on any issue by PMLN? so why r u complaining against PTI
3) Mujahideen is made under zia with support of Nawaz Sharif. Then later taliban rose with support of PMLN government in power. Most of the 50000 people who died in war was in time of coalition between PMLN and PPP. And then two party resolution was passed in favour of talks and PTI wasnt even part of that. SHahbaz sharif decleared them brothers which was sitting CM and imran didnt had one MNA that time . THEN ITS IMRAN FAULT.
4) FIrst of all Musharraf was validated by SC and elected by Q league. Secondly, Nawaz Sharif came out of dictator ship . he was brought in by army in the politics. Then as asghar khan case explains he took money from army to dislodge elected government of PPP. And all of the sudden PMLN supporters start talking about democracy
@Mansoon i love this justifications and how much time he had spend to defend sharif family corruption[/QUOTE]
Agree with (1).
For (2), isn't the PTI supposed to be the anti status quo party? It fulfills what the PML N cant. That is why people raise questions over the policies of PTI which completely belie its claims of being anti status quo. PTI is just as corrupt and autocratic as PML N and the like. That is what irks so many people of Imran Khan. Charity begins at home, as they say, and if he wants others to follow, he should set an example first, which he continuously fails to do.
(3) The so-called mujahideen were Zia, ISI and the USA's brainchild. Where was Nawaz Sharif in 1979? I doubt he had a major say in matters of such import at the time. But by not opposing this dangerous game and using Zia's trust in him to consolidate his power in Punjab later, yes, you can suit your narrative too.
(4) Do you think Musharraff being validated by SC and then elected by Q league is of any import? If anything, it goes to say a lot about our courts and puppet political parties. You can even justify the murder of this country's constitution by paying off the courts and parties. Mind you, in a more just world, Musharraf would have been tried for treason, not just for this crime, but for the numerous others that followed.