Devdas
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2013
- Messages
- 144
- Reaction score
- 0
Read the article: It's accepted by the vast majority of scholars, both inside and outside of India. It's sad that you're so disappointed in your ancestors that you're willing to claim ancestors that have nothing to do with you. The funny thing is, like I said, I'm North Indian, not Dravidian. However, Dravidian talent and civilization is both incredibly admirable and undeniable. While your ancestors were roaming Central Asia before being civilized by Arabs, they were building the walls of Harappa, similar to how they're building India's tech industry now.Harrapans were not Dravidian that is just one theory not accepted by any scholar outside of South India lol nor were Vedics. You are right that the subcontinent has seen many migrations but the locals were never uprooted in any of them the outsiders only settled and then married amongst them. There is no record of a mass slaughter of locals or locals all running down South. What you mean by genetics, genetics has already shown that while many groups in South Asia do have foreign descent there is not one group that can say they have no local ancestors in their genealogy. Pakistan's culture is a hybrid of South Asian, Central Asian, and Middle eastern culture which gives it one of the most culturally diffused cultures in the world but its heritage is as local as it gets and you Indians need to just get over it.
Nonsensical bakwas like Pakistanis do not follow Hindu customs therefore they lose their history to India is as absurd as saying Greeks cannot claim ancient Greek heritage since they are no longer pagan or Italians cannot claim Roman heritage or Egyptians the Nile River civilization or the Iraqis their Sumerian heritage anybody outside of India would laugh at such a notion.