Partition of India: Origin of Hatred

[INDIC]

1. First your claim that there were NO Muslim freedom fighters before 1857 got busted you said except 1857 there were no Muslim freedom fighters.

2. All those who started 1857 freedom fight against the British raj were non other than religious Muslims and that was not for their faith but for the freedom of Subcontinent. The Ulama waged relentless war against the Company rule just after defeat of Sirajud Dawla at Palasi in 1757.



British Army general, Tomson ,The British army general, who fought against Muslims in the uprising of 1857, wrote in his memoir: (Rebellion Clerics P-49): [B]”If to fight for one’s country, plan and mastermind wars against occupying mighty powers are patriotism, then undoubtedly maulvis (read Ulama hanged by the British rulers) were the loyal patriots to their country and their succeeding generations will remember them as heroes.”[/B]

1857 revolt was started by Mangal Pandey.

 

[Spring Onion]

Prior to 1857 struggle were localize and religious/provincial in nature. Kings were fighting for there state or religion. There was no idea of uprooting Brits from India.

As there was Tadka of Islam in that phase, Mullas were fierce. No one can fight better than a Muslim if the cause is religion. Its known fact, Mr Tomson didn't said anything we don't know.

But in later phase when Nation was the cause, Muslims collude with Brits and backstabbed Indian. The Gandhi loyal Ali brothers backstabbed Gandhi. (Gandi refer Ali brother as his two hands/eye)

Before and after Muslims were all for FREEDOM from the foreign occupation and it was your hindu extremists who were sowing seeds of hate in later years so much so that you hindus even backstabbed Gandhi and atlast killed him.

 

[Contrarian]

In larger numbers and weapons----.

But 1 Muslim Pakistani = 10 Hindus

 

[priti]

Ahh the Communal hate and bias.

Those skrimishes were the FIRST step towards Freedom

These were Muslim fakirs who have started the rebelion against east Indian compnay the one that led to rule of brits. you need some extensive study before giving credit to hindus.

and do you even know that thousands of Ulema were killed by the brits for standing against the occupation of sub-continent.

see, the way they fought it was not a freedom struggle. in that case when marathas defeated mughals in many places, was that a fredom struggle. it was just a joust for power.
same thing with those fakirs or ulema. the concept of freedome struggle had not come up at that time.

 

[jatt+gutts]

prior 1857 there were less contribution of punjabi both sikhs hindus and muslims because punjab was still free and ruled by locals

 

[Spring Onion]

1857 revolt was started by Mangal Pandey.

AGAINST????????????

 

[INDIC]

AGAINST????????????

Better read some books.

 

[Spring Onion]

see, the way they fought it was not a freedom struggle. in that case when marathas defeated mughals in many places, was that a fredom struggle. it was just a joust for power.
same thing with those fakirs or ulema. the concept of freedome struggle had not come up at that time.

Marhatas and Mughals were struggling for power.

Muslim fakirs were not struggling for any power. They were common, people who were against occupation of their land.

and oh dear you even dont know why were ulema killed.

 

[priti]

Marhatas and Mughals were struggling for power.

Muslim fakirs were not struggling for any power. They were common, people who were against occupation of their land.

and oh dear you even dont know why were ulema killed.

which ulema is this?
also that poster who said no muslim freedome fighter is wrong. only after 1857 there were hardly any muslim freedom fighters. there were some no doubt.

 

[Spring Onion]

Better read some books.

You need to read books. i dont. firing against cow fats is one thing and fighting for freedom is another.

 

[jatt+gutts]

even today if pakistan fight war with arabs majority pakistanis will fight for arabs.. a pakistani pilot asked to drop nuke bomb in mecca will rather drop it on lahore itself.

 

[INDIC]

You need to read books. i dont. firing against cow fats is one thing and fighting for freedom is another.

Yes, that incident started 1857 revolt. You are calling those people as freedom fighter who were dreaming to establish Islamic state in Hindu majority India.

 

[priti]

even today if pakistan fight war with arabs majority pakistanis will fight for arabs.. a pakistani pilot asked to drop nuke bomb in mecca will rather drop it on lahore itself.

thats why when muslims invaded india they wanted to destroy hinduism and plant muslim. but they could not find one center to destroy. eg, they mistakenly destroyed buddhism site of nalanda thining they were brahmins. then they destroyed ayodhya, mathura, banaras etc and build mosks over temple (this is haraam , btw) but hindusim was not a religion, they didnt konw that.

 

[Spring Onion]

which ulema is this?
also that poster who said no muslim freedome fighter is wrong. only after 1857 there were hardly any muslim freedom fighters. there were some no doubt.

its Ulema means multiple not is.

thousands who were exiled and killed in Andaman

even today if pakistan fight war with arabs majority pakistanis will fight for arabs.. a pakistani pilot asked to drop nuke bomb in mecca will rather drop it on lahore itself.

katju was right. 90% Indians are idiots.

NVM. funny the Indian hindus are abusing own Muslims and accepting their role in freedom fight

 

[priti]

its Ulema means multiple not is.

thousands who were exiled and killed in Andaman



katju was right. 90% Indians are idiots.

NVM. funny the Indian hindus are abusing own Muslims and accepting their role in freedom fight

who abused muslims?freedom fighters from hinduism are more because of 5 times greater population.
the real freedome fighters from muslim community stayed in india (like aamir khans uncle)