What's new

Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Emmie said:
Obviously the judgement has to be based on 63(1)(1), for it was the article which was invoked
Click to expand...
So on what constitutional article will the ruling for "conflict of interest" be?
 
.
Emmie said:
It says who ceases to be a Pakistani it doesn't say about dual national, a dual national is still a Pakistani.

Want to read a long judgement of Justice Chaudhry?
Click to expand...

Can u share the link of Justice Umar Ata Bandial's judgment... tht u were referring to?

Emmie said:
Yes! JIT was provided with all the record, same is true for PTI.
Click to expand...

What, if these docs are those...which Kh Haris..brought at the end of hearing...which SC refused to accept?
 
.
Farah Sohail said:
Sheikh rashid argued...ke phir tu PM ko agar koi enemy agency hire kar ley..phir?
Click to expand...

In that case, article 91 of the constitution would be invoked. That is the oath for the PM part of which is:
That, as Prime Minister of Pakistan, I will discharge my duties, and perform my functions, hon-estly, to the best of my ability, faithfully in accordance with the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the law, and always in the interest of the sovereignty, integrity, solidarity, well- being and prosperity of Pakistan:
Click to expand...

Can you prove beyond reasonable doubt that the PM has acted against his oath?
 
.
Farah Sohail said:
Sheikh rashid argued...ke phir tu PM ko agar koi enemy agency hire kar ley..phir?
Click to expand...
Just heard Sh. Rasheed.
He is in the view that nothing is going to change regarding the evidence which they are claiming now.
Case is closed and no new evidence can be considerd now.

Apart from that... lahore m banners lagy hn " mian saab jany do shehbaz sharif ko any do " is it true ?
If it is then from whome ?
Is there a clear rift in noora league ?
 
.
This might also lead to DQ:
In his rejoinder filed in the Supreme Court in Constitutional Petition No. 29 of 2016 [Imran Khan v Mian Nawaz Sharif & others], the incumbent Prime Minister claimed that he had no business connection whatsoever with his sons. Now it is admitted that he was employee in his son’s company (Capital, FZE)
 
.
Hyprion said:
JApart from that... lahore m banners lagy hn " mian saab jany do shehbaz sharif ko any do " is it true ?
If it is then from whome ?
Is there a clear rift in noora league ?
Click to expand...

maybe by Hamza Shahbaz ... he wasn't so happy about Maryam getting all the attention ... obviously with Shahbaz's consent
 
. .
Hyprion said:
Just heard Sh. Rasheed.
He is in the view that nothing is going to change regarding the evidence which they are claiming now.
Case is closed and no new evidence can be considerd now.

Apart from that... lahore m banners lagy hn " mian saab jany do shehbaz sharif ko any do " is it true ?
If it is then from whome ?
Is there a clear rift in noora league ?
Click to expand...

DFZxOyMW0AA_5kn.jpg

DFZxPUjW0AA2qas.jpg
 
.
. .
Disgusting if he held anyother role above the Prime Minister Job ....disrespect to the hightest civilian position in Pakistan



I earned this from my Director of Marketing Job it is Halal, if you doubt my salary JIT bana do
_67586060_67586059.jpg




Badshah Nawaz , ka khane ki Party hai !!!!


eatingfrompoor.jpg


heli-copter2.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
Farah Sohail said:
Mera nahi khyal ke NS ke bach janay ka koi chance hai... Undeclared bank accounts, conflict of interest on dubai job..qatari letter, jhoot....no money trial..forged docs..maryam beneficial pwner proved...what else is reqd for disqualification?

Now..has it been proved tht these docs whivh are now shown on media..were they submitted to SC, and JIT, before or not? @Emmie

Aur doosri baat ye ke PML N jo ab dey rahi hai..aguments/docs ..ye pehle kiun nahi diye..jab Kh Haris arguments de rahay thay? Why on last day? SC hasnt even accepted and made these docs, part of record..agar ye wohi hain, jo Kh Haris end main laaye thay?

Ye docs waisa hi twist tu nahi jo 2 days pehle Hussain nawaz ke docs thay ke game changer hain...aur SC ne aisi taisi kar di thee..un docs ki?
Click to expand...

Abhi 92 report kar raha tha ke SC has accepted these docs..

It means my friend was right when he said it would be difficult for SC being the very last forum to not accept anything from defense.
 
.
 
.
Farah Sohail said:
@PakSword @Emmie @Hyperion

Amir Mateen

https://twitter.com/x/status/889068089920368641

https://twitter.com/x/status/889069180061982722

https://twitter.com/x/status/889069774797508608

https://twitter.com/x/status/889071350467497984

https://twitter.com/x/status/889072819673473024

https://twitter.com/x/status/889075557396357121

https://twitter.com/amirmateen2/status/889076601488633858
Click to expand...
So the "new evidence " is also destined for " raddi ki tokri " ?

When the mandatory forms were not filled accordingly and these things were not mentioned in those then that establishes the fact that they were intentionally concealed or will it be considered as a simple mistake?
 
.
PakSword said:
Abhi 92 report kar raha tha ke SC has accepted these docs..

It means my friend was right when he said it would be difficult for SC being the very last forum to not accept anything from defense.
Click to expand...

PTI JI Sheikh Rasheed ko tu chance hi nahi mila rebuttal main in documents per arguments denay ka!
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

GlobalVillageSpace
Panama Case: should Supreme Court render the final judgement?
Replies
0
Views
573
GlobalVillageSpace
GlobalVillageSpace
PakSword
Panamagate case: London flats were bought through Qatari investments, Sharif family tells SC
5 6 7 8 9 10
Replies
136
Views
10K
The Eagle
The Eagle

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom