Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

[expert]

Every source of income has to be declared.

Then the PM was entitled to the Salary and he should have listed it. There is no way that a misdeclaration was not made here.

 

[PakSword]

Every source of income has to be declared.

"Source" of income has been declared.. not the income.. is it required?

 

[FlyingAce]

Ager disqualify kerna hua (jis kay chances mujhy ab kam hi lagtay hain) tu PM ko summon kerain gay ya zaroori nahi?

Not Necessarily, There is "Maybe" mentioned in the Court Order of 20th April, He can be disqualified for ample of reasons apart from fze capital---

 

[Baghial]

Aj phir meri usi banday say baat hui. Wo abhi bhi yea hi keh raha hai "Deal has been struck. Cases Trial Courts main jayen gay bas. Aur kuch nahi ho ga"

Aur supreme court should also pass a short notice for honest n hard working pakistani citizens . For . 10 lashes each. Just for clining hopes of justic in pak.

 

[PakSword]

But they HAVE accepted the documents today have they not?

I think these docs are circulating on media only.. SC didn't accept them on Friday..

 

[expert]

Come on you all, NS EC Assets details does not have a mention of FZE Capital or Salary, or Job Title or Iqama! This is enough grounds for Misdeclaration of assets to disqualify him- SECP is compromised after Zafar Hijazi was caught tampering records for Sharif Family-
2nd of all all the time was given to Khawaja Haris yet he didn't mention these documents until friday which was refused by the judges---- i personally feel this is just to show the voters of PMLN & create Media Optics--- and ofcourse to Malign JIT,,,

I am convinced now that there is enough evidence to satisfy what the judges wanted before invoking 62/63. If they fail to disqualify Nawaz Sharif by accepting that he was not required to declare the 10,000 he was entitled to but did not receive, I will believe that the Supreme Court has failed to do justice.

 

[FlyingAce]

"Source" of income has been declared.. not the income.. is it required?

Income has to be declared apart from the Source- and as per the UAE Wage Protection there should be a account & salary should be credited into the account of the person employed by the company be it marketing manager or Chairman... I am 200% sure salary was been credited till the company was closed in 2014!

 

[Emmie]

My friend, who discussed it with a lawyer, says that agar trial court na bhejna hota tou SC document accept karti, chahay last minute hi kyun na hota..

Agar SC ne documents reject kardiey, tou iss ka matlab SC mind bana chuki hai ke baqi docs trial court main submit hojaeingay.. there is no hurry..

Trial court mein constitutional matters entertain nahi hotay. This case will definitely go to a trial court, there's no doubt about it. We're talking about disqualification under article 62/63 which obviously can't be decided by a trial court.

 

[PakSword]

Trial court tu jaana hi hai.. Theres no doubt abt tht

No, about the disqualification as well. It is a big big decision and there is no court that can hear after SCs verdict.. In the review petition, no one is allowed to present anymore docs.. That's why PMs lawyers were saying that SC must act carefully.

Trial court mein constitutional matters entertain nahi hotay. This case will definitely go to a trial court, there's no doubt about it. We're talking about disqualification under article 62/63 which obviously can't be decided by a trial court.

But disqualification on contested/ challenged docs/ facts?

 

[FlyingAce]

I am convinced now that there is enough evidence to satisfy what the judges wanted before invoking 62/63. If they fail to disqualify Nawaz Sharif by accepting that he was not required to declare the 10,000 he was entitled to but did not receive, I will believe that the Supreme Court has failed to do justice.

It is not possible to declare & not receive as per UAE Labour law, Wage Protection is there for only this reason- Whatever salary is mentioned in the Employment Contract should be credited into the Employee Account... Salary was being transferred to NS Account in UAE,

 

[Farah Sohail]

My friend, who discussed it with a lawyer, says that agar trial court na bhejna hota tou SC document accept karti, chahay last minute hi kyun na hota..

Agar SC ne documents reject kardiey, tou iss ka matlab SC mind bana chuki hai ke baqi docs trial court main submit hojaeingay.. there is no hurry..

Not necessary... Inke docs ki forgery pakri jaa chuki thee... Judges pehle bhi keh chukay thay ke jo sawaal poochtay hain..uske docs aajatay hain.....aur agar koi docs PM ke aanay thay tu Kh Haris ne pehle kiun nahi diye? Jab woh arguments de rahay thay? Last day of hearing par kiun laaye?

 

[PakSword]

Income has to be declared apart from the Source- and as per the UAE Wage Protection there should be a account & salary should be credited into the account of the person employed by the company be it marketing manager or Chairman... I am 200% sure salary was been credited till the company was closed in 2014!

Do others declare income on agricultural land etc? I am not very sure about this requirement by the way.

If the law requires to declare income of every income source, then he is definitely in trouble, otherwise not.. Because on the visa, his post and his employer, both are mentioned.

 

[Baghial]

Then the PM was entitled to the Salary and he should have listed it. There is no way that a misdeclaration was not made here.

Not accepting salary.??? 1 reason for this in a limited liability company.is that u r not goining to pay any taxes in the concerned country.where the company is created. ...if justice startd thinking like a thief. They will very quickley catch one. .. nusrat javed gave hint of it. Yesterday .

 

[PakSword]

Not necessary... Inke docs ki forgery pakri jaa chuki thee... Judges pehle bhi keh chukay thay ke jo sawaal poochtay hain..uske docs aajatay hain.....aur agar koi docs PM ke aanay thay tu Kh Haris ne pehle kiun nahi diye? Jab woh arguments de rahay thay? Last day of hearing par kiun laaye?

Hosakta hai aap theek hon.. But I agree with my friend's assessment that SC is the last court and they consider even a small chit, or they warn that this is the last day of submission of 1,2,3 .....

 

[Emmie]

"Source" of income has been declared.. not the income.. is it required?

No, nothing has been declared, neither the source nor the income. Source that does not generate any income shouldn't be a source in first place, logic 101. It's the income which matters, you can't justify income without a source, so definitely both.