Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

[Baghial]

Not really. They don't bring a new twist. The PM has said nothing new. It would have been better to stay quiet than say
It is up to the respondent to prove that the accepted evidence of the 10,000 AED is wrong. On the one hand they can't refute that the Iqama form that says he had a salary of 10,000AED. On the other hand they're saying that it was a ceremonial role for which they have no proof. I.E They have no proof that he did not withdraw that 10,000AED.

Then they say

It is up to them to prove that this was an error. They will have to show that 145 million was pad and 45 million was returned.

Then they ask the court


One of the three judges that decided against DQ has already said



At the end of the day, if Nawaz Sharif gets away with technical justice, it will be a shame for the judiciary, Pakistan and the people of Pakistan. Two judges have already set a precedent that it's within their power to DQ.

Shame for judiciary... not at all. A partner in crime cant have any remorse or shame. This character is only found in honest and god fearing ordinary citizens of pakistan. Nawaz just got oprated kast year. Where succesful opration was performed to take out ZAMEER

 

[Spring Onion]

He is using PC as bargainig chip. He wants to become PM

Media was in favour Nisar as Prime Minister few months back when this panama case was just started.

anyway lets see what NS has in store for him.

Sharif family wants a minnow as replacement not a political giant like Chaui Nisar

 

[Emmie]

Nawaz Sharif is a pathological liar, I am sorry I can't help my fingers.

 

[Spring Onion]

I don't know why but I want him to disassociate himself from this party. This would bring some respect to him. I guess! He's been to his lows in past few yrs to just back the corrupted mafia.

WELL NO. He is a senior and brainy politician also balanced one. he will not change party neither should he since there is no room for him in PPP or even in PTI. I feel Chaui Nisar should lead Pakistan Muslim League . He would be a good Prime Minister

 

[expert]

چودھری نثار نے پریس کانفرنس کل تک کیلیےملتوی کی ہے

Nawaz Sharif is a pathological liar, I am sorry I can't help my fingers.

Can you point out the exact area where there is irrefutable proof that he lied? Was he required to declare his chairmanship and salary that he "didn't withdraw" on this form? The three judges will have to decide on this but I want to know which way it's going to go.

 

[Shane]

@Emmie @QatariPrince

I knew it. Noony toons are so predictable.

The Judges themselves have said on numerous occasions that the defence suddenly produces papers according to their need out of no where.

I even posted about this new revelation a few pages back:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/pana...-and-discussion.459474/page-1161#post-9691589

Specifically:

It's about failure to disclose essential information by the defendant that judges have made sure themselves that there is no doubt a serious omission on his part. An omission that may yet cost him his premiership.

Talal however has said something new meaning we may see their handy work of more manufactured docs.

He said that these FZE company info although not mentioned in writing (wink wink) but documents are attached with his nomination papers for 2013 elections, lol.

They are preparing grounds for the appeal already too, lol.

XxxxxxX

Well its up to the judges to decided, but this last min submission brings a new twist thou

 

[expert]

Shame for judiciary... not at all. A partner in crime cant have any remorse or shame. This character is only found in honest and god fearing ordinary citizens of pakistan. Nawaz just got oprated kast year. Where succesful opration was performed to take out ZAMEER

I don't doubt the integrity of the judges. Read the judgement and you'll know what I mean. None of the judges have declared Nawaz innocent. It's more about their interpretation of the Court's powers and facts before them. Unfortunately, while there is enough incriminating evidence that Nawaz has been dishonest, there is nothing that can't be refuted.

 

[Emmie]

Can you point out the exact area where there is irrefutable proof that he lied? Was he required to declare his chairmanship and salary that he "didn't withdraw" on this form? The three judges will have to decide on this but I want to know which way it's going to go.

He was supposed to declare his chairmanship and salary in Form 21 of ECP which every member of the assembly files with ECP every year. He has never declared this in any of the official declarations.

 

[expert]

@Emmie @QatariPrince

I knew it. Noony toons are so predictable.

The Judges themselves have said on numerous occasions that the defence suddenly produces papers according to their need out of no where.

I even posted about this new revelation a few pages back:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/pana...-and-discussion.459474/page-1161#post-9691589

Specifically:

It's about failure to disclose essential information by the defendant that judges have made sure themselves that there is no doubt a serious omission on his part. An omission that may yet cost him his premiership.

Talal however has said something new meaning we may see their handy work of more manufactured docs.

He said that these FZE company info although not mentioned in writing (wink wink) but documents are attached with his nomination papers for 2013 elections, lol.

They are preparing grounds for the appeal already too, lol.

XxxxxxX

The decision by this Court cannot be appealed. This is not a trial but a constitutional petition. 62/63 is part of the constitution and in falls upon the SC to decide whether or not Nawaz Sharif fulfills those requirements. Unfortunately, a failure to disclose essential information through the Court proceedings are not going to enable the judges to conclusively say that Nawaz was dishonest. Dishonesty is the only way Nawaz Sharif can be thrown out. The two judges who DQ him did so on the basis of his contradictory speeches. Unfortunately, the other three judges have said those speeches can't be used against him.

 

[Dastaan]

Another backdated paper modification by pm team.

Why these judges so far trying to save nawaz sharif?

The accountability should start immediately to avoid bloody revolution.

31-03-2013 sunday ko document sign kiya gya....shayd ye doc bhi fraud ho...

 

[PakSword]

There was a reason nominations papers were removed from EC's website.

 

[expert]

He was supposed to declare his chairmanship and salary in Form 21 of ECP which every member of the assembly files with ECP every year. He has never declared this in any of the official declarations.

You are right. Nawaz's defence that he did not withdraw a salary won't stand in Court. They need proof to say he did not "withdraw" a salary when they have accepted that on the Iqama it does indeed say he had a salary. Salaries are paid not withdrawn. Have the petitioner's lawyers raised this point?

Now let's consider the judges don't want to DQ him at any cost. How will they justify the non-disclosure of his salary that he alleges not to have withdrawn?

 

[Baghial]

WELL NO. He is a senior and brainy politician also balanced one. he will not change party neither should he since there is no room for him in PPP or even in PTI. I feel Chaui Nisar should lead Pakistan Muslim League . He would be a good Prime Minister

For the people he dislikes .he make,s sure to put a big dent in there lives. I wonder how he will work under same blanket as kh asis a pm

 

[PakSword]

Nawaz Sharif is a pathological liar, I am sorry I can't help my fingers.

Were both of these declaration made before 2013 elections?

 

[FlyingAce]

There are more evidence to suggest that NS has lied in front of the Court, Has happened in the past SCP has Disqualified MNA for not Declaring 10 or 15000rs & NS is a MNA --- Equality should be for all,,, I Have a feeling SCP would make a dabang decision once for all... No more technical justice this time around- SCP repute is on stake as well...